From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e805-e810. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002413.
Risk tolerance and risk perceptions may impact clinicians' decisions to obtain diagnostic tests. We sought to determine whether physician risk perception was associated with the decision to obtain blood or imaging tests among children who present to the emergency department with fever.
We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in the Boston Children's Hospital emergency department. We included children aged 6 months to 18 years from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2019, with fever. Our primary outcome was diagnostic testing: obtaining a blood and/or imaging test. We assessed risk perception using 3 scales: the Risk Tolerance Scale (RTS), Stress From Uncertainty Scale (SUS), and Malpractice Fear Scale (MFS). A z score was assigned to each physician for each scale. Mixed-effects logistic regression assessed the association between physician risk perception and blood or imaging testing. We also examined the relationship between each risk perception scale and several secondary outcomes: blood testing, urine testing, diagnostic imaging, specialist consultation, hospitalization, and revisit within 72 hours.
The response rate was 55/56 (98%). We analyzed 12,527 encounters. Blood/imaging testing varied between physicians (median, 48%; interquartile range, 41%-53%; range, 30%-71%). Risk Tolerance Scale responses were not associated with blood/imaging testing (odds ratio [OR], 1.03 per SD of increased risk perception; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.13). Stress From Uncertainty Scale responses were not associated with blood/imaging testing (OR, 1.04 per SD; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14). Malpractice Fear Scale responses were not associated with blood/imaging testing (OR, 1.00 per SD; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). There was no significant association between RTS, MFS, or SUS and any secondary outcome, except that there was a weak association between SUS and specialist consultation (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.24).
Across 55 pediatric emergency physicians with variable testing practices, there was no association between risk perception and blood/imaging testing in febrile children.
风险承受能力和风险认知可能会影响临床医生获取诊断测试的决策。我们旨在确定在因发热就诊于急诊科的儿童中,医生的风险认知是否与获取血液或影像学检查的决策相关。
我们在波士顿儿童医院急诊科进行了一项回顾性、横断面研究。我们纳入了 2014 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 30 日期间年龄在 6 个月至 18 岁的发热儿童。主要结局为诊断性检查:进行血液和/或影像学检查。我们使用 3 个量表评估风险认知:风险承受量表(RTS)、不确定压力量表(SUS)和医疗过失恐惧量表(MFS)。为每位医生的每个量表分配一个 z 分数。混合效应逻辑回归评估了医生风险认知与血液或影像学检查之间的关联。我们还研究了每个风险认知量表与几个次要结局之间的关系:血液检查、尿液检查、诊断性影像学检查、专科会诊、住院和 72 小时内复诊。
应答率为 55/56(98%)。我们分析了 12527 次就诊。不同医生之间的血液/影像学检查存在差异(中位数,48%;四分位间距,41%-53%;范围,30%-71%)。风险承受量表的反应与血液/影像学检查无关(优势比[OR],风险感知每增加 1 个标准差增加 1.03;95%置信区间[CI],0.95-1.13)。不确定压力量表的反应与血液/影像学检查无关(OR,每增加 1 个标准差增加 1.04;95%CI,0.95-1.14)。医疗过失恐惧量表的反应与血液/影像学检查无关(OR,每增加 1 个标准差增加 1.00;95%CI,0.91-1.09)。除了 SUS 与专科会诊之间存在弱关联(OR,1.12;95%CI,1.00-1.24)外,RTS、MFS 或 SUS 与任何次要结局之间均无显著关联。
在具有不同检测实践的 55 名儿科急诊医生中,发热儿童的风险认知与血液/影像学检查之间没有关联。