Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 31;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05067-5.
The aims of this study are to (1) determine whether fixation of metastatic long bone fractures with an intramedullary nail (IMN) influences the incidence of lung metastasis in comparison to arthroplasty or ORIF (Arthro/ORIF); and (2) assess this relationship in primary tumor types; and (3) to assess survival implications of lung metastasis after surgery.
Retrospective cohort study investigating 184 patients (107 IMN, and 77 Arthro/ORIF) surgically treated for metastatic long bone fractures. Patients were required to have a single surgically treated impending or established pathologic fracture of a long bone, pre-operative lung imaging (lung radiograph or computed tomography) and post-operative lung imaging within 6 months of surgery. Primary cancer types included were breast (n = 70), lung (n = 43), prostate (n = 34), renal cell (n = 37). Statistical analyses were conducted using two-tailed Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.
Patients treated with IMN and Arthro/ORIF developed new or progressive lung metastases following surgery at an incidence of 34 and 26%, respectively. Surgical method did not significantly influence lung metastasis (p = 0.33). Furthermore, an analysis of primary cancer subgroups did not yield any differences between IMN vs Arthro/ORIF. Median survival for the entire cohort was 11 months and 1-year overall survival was 42.7% (95% CI: 35.4-49.8). Regardless of fixation method, the presence of new or progressive lung metastatic disease at follow up imaging study was found to have a negative impact on patient survival (p < 0.001).
In this study, development or progression of metastatic lung disease was not affected by long bone stabilization strategy. IM manipulation of metastatic long bone fractures therefore may not result in a clinically relevant increase in metastatic lung burden. The results of this study also suggest that lung metastasis within 6 months of surgery for metastatic long bone lesions is negatively associated with patient survival.
III, therapeutic study.
本研究旨在:(1)确定与关节置换或切开复位内固定(ORIF)相比,髓内钉(IMN)固定转移性长骨骨折是否会影响肺转移的发生率;(2)评估原发肿瘤类型的关系;(3)评估术后肺转移的生存意义。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 184 名接受手术治疗的转移性长骨骨折患者(107 例行 IMN 固定,77 例行关节置换或 ORIF)。患者需要有单一的即将发生或已发生病理性的长骨骨折,术前有肺部影像学(肺部 X 线或 CT),术后 6 个月内有肺部影像学。包括的主要癌症类型有乳腺癌(n=70)、肺癌(n=43)、前列腺癌(n=34)、肾细胞癌(n=37)。采用双侧 Fisher 确切检验和 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析进行统计学分析。
接受 IMN 和关节置换或 ORIF 治疗的患者术后新发或进展性肺转移的发生率分别为 34%和 26%。手术方法对肺转移无显著影响(p=0.33)。此外,对原发癌亚组的分析也没有显示出 IMN 与关节置换或 ORIF 之间的差异。整个队列的中位生存期为 11 个月,1 年总生存率为 42.7%(95%CI:35.4-49.8)。无论固定方法如何,在随访影像学研究中发现新的或进展性的肺转移疾病都会对患者的生存产生负面影响(p<0.001)。
在这项研究中,转移性肺部疾病的发展或进展不受长骨稳定策略的影响。因此,转移性长骨骨折的 IM 处理可能不会导致临床相关的转移性肺负担增加。这项研究的结果还表明,转移性长骨病变手术后 6 个月内发生肺转移与患者的生存呈负相关。
III 级,治疗性研究。