Suppr超能文献

《CARA 法案对俄勒冈州执业护士管制物质处方的影响:一项队列研究》。

The impact of CARA mandates on nurse practitioner controlled substance prescribing in Oregon: a cohort study.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA, 98686-9600, USA.

OSU/OHSU College of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Collaborative Life Sciences Building (CLSB), 2730 SW Moody Ave., CL5CP, Portland, OR, 97201-5042, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Jan 31;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00431-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the United States Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) expanded authorization to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) to nurse practitioners (NPs). Compared to physicians, NPs were required to complete 16 additional hours of training on controlled substance prescribing before a buprenorphine waiver application. As this differential additional education mandate was seen as a potential barrier, we evaluated the impact of this requirement on both NP waiver acquisition and prescribing of controlled substances, comparing NPs who obtained waivers to those who had not.

METHODS

Through 2016-2018 Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and linked NP licensure data, we identified factors associated with waiver acquisition at baseline (2016) and evaluated changes in controlled substance prescribing before (2016) and after waiver acquisition (2018). Using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U testing, we calculated and described controlled substance prescribing types, rates, and patient level quantities including co-prescribing of benzodiazepines and opioids by NPs. Multivariable linear regression compared prescribing by waivered and non-waivered NPs for significant changes in non-buprenorphine controlled substance prescribing.

RESULTS

Waivered NPs were more likely to have a psychiatric certification, have prior disciplinary action, and have generally higher levels of non-buprenorphine controlled substance prescribing than their non-waivered counterparts. While there was a significant increase in opioid prescriptions per patient among waivered NPs, following CARA implementation, co-prescribing of benzodiazepines and opioids significantly declined among waivered NPs relative to non-waivered NPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although educational requirements were rescinded in 2021 for most applicants, enhanced opioid prescribing training should be incorporated into professional educational offerings regardless of regulatory mandate. We recommended continued focus on education regarding avoidance of high risk prescribing such as co-prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines. NPs who acquire waivers may take on higher risk patients already using opioids, and these findings may represent transitions in practice and patient setting.

摘要

背景

2017 年,美国综合成瘾与康复法案(CARA)扩大了向执业护士(NPs)开具丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的授权。与医生相比,NPs 在申请丁丙诺啡豁免前,需要完成 16 个小时的额外受控物质处方培训。由于这种额外的教育要求被视为潜在的障碍,我们评估了这一要求对 NP 豁免获得和受控物质处方的影响,比较了获得豁免和未获得豁免的 NPs。

方法

通过 2016-2018 年俄勒冈州处方药物监测计划和相关的 NP 许可数据,我们确定了基线(2016 年)时豁免获得的相关因素,并评估了豁免获得前后(2016 年和 2018 年)受控物质处方的变化。我们使用卡方和曼-惠特尼 U 检验,计算和描述了 NP 开具的受控物质处方类型、比率和患者水平数量,包括苯二氮䓬类和阿片类药物的共同处方。多变量线性回归比较了豁免和非豁免 NP 之间非丁丙诺啡受控物质处方的显著变化。

结果

与非豁免者相比,获得豁免的 NP 更有可能具有精神科认证、曾受到纪律处分,并且总体上开具的非丁丙诺啡受控物质处方量更高。虽然在 CARA 实施后,获得豁免的 NP 每例患者的阿片类药物处方显著增加,但与非豁免 NP 相比,获得豁免的 NP 中阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的共同处方显著减少。

结论

尽管大多数申请人的教育要求已于 2021 年取消,但无论监管要求如何,都应将增强的阿片类药物处方培训纳入专业教育课程。我们建议继续关注避免高风险处方的教育,如阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的共同处方。获得豁免的 NP 可能会接手已经使用阿片类药物的高风险患者,这些发现可能代表着实践和患者环境的转变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验