Suppr超能文献

绝经命名法综述。

A review of menopause nomenclature.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

Discipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Building 12, 11 Kirinari Street, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.

出版信息

Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01336-7.

Abstract

Menopause nomenclature varies in the scholarly literature making synthesis and interpretation of research findings difficult. Therefore, the present study aimed to review and discuss critical developments in menopause nomenclature; determine the level of heterogeneity amongst menopause definitions and compare them with the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop criteria. Definitions/criteria used to characterise premenopausal and postmenopausal status were extracted from 210 studies and 128 of these studies were included in the final analyses. The main findings were that 39.84% of included studies were consistent with STRAW classification of premenopause, whereas 70.31% were consistent with STRAW classification of postmenopause. Surprisingly, major inconsistencies relating to premenopause definition were due to a total lack of reporting of any definitions/criteria for premenopause (39.84% of studies). In contrast, only 20.31% did not report definitions/criteria for postmenopause. The present findings indicate that there is a significant amount of heterogeneity associated with the definition of premenopause, compared with postmenopause. We propose three key suggestions/recommendations, which can be distilled from these findings. Firstly, premenopause should be transparently operationalised and reported. Secondly, as a minimum requirement, regular menstruation should be defined as the number of menstrual cycles in a period of at least 3 months. Finally, the utility of introducing normative age-ranges as supplementary criterion for defining stages of reproductive ageing should be considered. The use of consistent terminology in research will enhance our capacity to compare results from different studies and more effectively investigate issues related to women's health and ageing.

摘要

绝经术语在学术文献中存在差异,使得研究结果的综合和解释变得困难。因此,本研究旨在回顾和讨论绝经术语的重要发展;确定绝经定义之间的异质性程度,并将其与生殖衰老工作坊标准进行比较。从 210 项研究中提取了用于描述绝经前和绝经后状态的定义/标准,其中 128 项研究纳入最终分析。主要发现是,纳入研究中有 39.84%与 STRAW 分类的绝经前一致,而 70.31%与 STRAW 分类的绝经后一致。令人惊讶的是,与绝经前定义相关的主要不一致是由于完全没有报告任何绝经前的定义/标准(39.84%的研究)。相比之下,只有 20.31%的研究没有报告绝经后定义/标准。本研究结果表明,与绝经后相比,绝经前的定义存在很大程度的异质性。我们从这些发现中提出了三个关键建议/建议。首先,应透明地操作和报告绝经前。其次,作为最低要求,应将定期月经定义为至少 3 个月内的月经周期数。最后,应考虑引入规范年龄范围作为定义生殖衰老阶段的补充标准的效用。在研究中使用一致的术语将提高我们比较不同研究结果的能力,并更有效地研究与妇女健康和衰老相关的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/8805414/f08cd0b6d2f4/12978_2022_1336_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验