Flemons Kristin, Bosch Michael, Coakeley Sarah, Muzammal Bushra, Kachra Rahim, Ruzycki Shannon M
W21C, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Feb 1;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00236-x.
Preoperative medical consultations add expense and burden for patients and the impact of these consults on patient outcomes is conflicting. Previous work suggests that 10-40% of preoperative medical consult recommendations are not followed. This limits measurement of the effect of perioperative medical consultation on patient outcomes and represents a quality gap, given the patient time and healthcare cost associated with consultation. We aimed to measure, characterize, and understand reasons for missed recommendations from preoperative medical consultation.
This explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study used chart audits followed by semi-structured interviews. Chart audit of consecutive patients seen in preoperative medical clinic were reviewed to measure the proportion and characterize the type of recommendations that were not completed ("missed"). This phase informed the interview participants and questions. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Template analysis was used to understand drivers and barriers of missed recommendations RESULTS: Chart audit included 255 patients (n=161, 63.1% female) seen in preadmission clinic between April 1 and April 30, 2019. 55.7% of patients had all recommendations followed (n=142). Postoperative anticoagulation management and postoperative cardiac biomarker surveillance recommendations were least commonly followed (50.0%, n=28, and 68.9%, n=82, respectively). Eighteen surgical team members were interviewed. Missed recommendations were both unintentional and intentional, and the key drivers differed by these categories. Unintentionally missed recommendations occurred due to individual-level factors (drivers: knowledge of the consultation note, lack of routine for reviewing the consultation note, and competing demands on time) and systems-level factors (driver: lack of role clarity). Intentionally missed recommendations occurred due to user error due (drivers: lack of knowledge of guidelines or evidence) and appropriate modifications (driver: need to adapt a preoperative plan for a complicated postoperative course).
Only 55.7% of consult notes had all recommendations followed, suggesting a quality gap in perioperative medical care. Qualitative data suggests multiple drivers of missed recommendations that should be targeted to improve the efficiency of care for these patients.
术前医学会诊增加了患者的费用和负担,且这些会诊对患者预后的影响存在争议。先前的研究表明,10%-40%的术前医学会诊建议未得到遵循。鉴于与会诊相关的患者时间和医疗成本,这限制了对围手术期医学会诊对患者预后影响的评估,代表了一个质量差距。我们旨在衡量、描述并理解术前医学会诊中未遵循建议的原因。
这项解释性、序贯混合方法研究采用病历审核,随后进行半结构化访谈。对术前医学门诊连续就诊患者的病历进行审核,以衡量未完成(“未遵循”)建议的比例并描述其类型。此阶段为访谈参与者和问题提供了信息。访谈指南是使用实施研究综合框架和理论领域框架制定的。采用模板分析来理解未遵循建议的驱动因素和障碍。
病历审核纳入了2019年4月1日至4月30日在入院前门诊就诊的255例患者(n = 161,63.1%为女性)。55.7%的患者所有建议均得到遵循(n = 142)。术后抗凝管理和术后心脏生物标志物监测建议最不常被遵循(分别为50.0%,n = 28;68.9%,n = 82)。对18名手术团队成员进行了访谈。未遵循的建议既有无意的也有有意的,关键驱动因素因类别而异。无意未遵循的建议是由于个人层面的因素(驱动因素:对会诊记录的了解、缺乏审查会诊记录的常规流程以及时间上的相互冲突需求)和系统层面的因素(驱动因素:角色不明确)导致的。有意未遵循的建议是由于用户错误(驱动因素:缺乏指南或证据的知识)和适当的调整(驱动因素:需要针对复杂的术后病程调整术前计划)导致的。
只有55.7%的会诊记录所有建议均得到遵循,这表明围手术期医疗存在质量差距。定性数据表明未遵循建议有多种驱动因素,应针对这些因素来提高对这些患者的护理效率。