Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Aug;105(8):2637-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
Provider-centered accountability, defined as the anticipation of a social interaction between a patient and their provider, increases patients' adherence to prescribed treatment. Digital adherence interventions based on accountability may be especially effective at promoting adherence. The current study aimed to assess whether publications on digital adherence interventions discuss accountability, include intervention components related to accountability, and measure feelings of patient accountability as an outcome.
PubMed was queried between January 2010 and March 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials incorporating digital adherence interventions. Full-text articles were assessed for participant demographics, interventions utilized, outcomes, and intervention effectiveness.
A total of 131 publications met inclusion criteria. Only four publications discussed accountability as a potential factor influencing patient adherence. Although 11% of publications included an intervention with direct accountability, only one did so by design. None of the included studies assessed feelings of accountability as an outcome.
While provider-centered accountability has the potential to boost the efficacy of digital adherence interventions, accountability is rarely incorporated in studies of such interventions.
Additional investigation into the influence of accountability on adherence interventions will allow for the development of these interventions as effective tools applicable to the full range of patients.
以提供者为中心的问责制,即患者与提供者之间社会互动的预期,可提高患者对规定治疗的依从性。基于问责制的数字依从性干预措施可能特别有效地促进依从性。本研究旨在评估数字依从性干预措施的出版物是否讨论了问责制,包括与问责制相关的干预措施组成部分,并将患者的问责感作为结果进行测量。
2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月,在 PubMed 上查询了纳入数字依从性干预措施的随机对照试验。评估了全文文章的参与者人口统计学、干预措施的利用、结果和干预效果。
共有 131 篇出版物符合纳入标准。只有 4 篇出版物讨论了问责制作为影响患者依从性的潜在因素。尽管 11%的出版物包含了直接问责制的干预措施,但只有一项是出于设计目的。没有一项纳入的研究将问责感作为结果进行评估。
尽管以提供者为中心的问责制有可能提高数字依从性干预措施的效果,但在这些干预措施的研究中很少纳入问责制。
进一步研究问责制对依从性干预措施的影响,将使这些干预措施作为适用于所有患者的有效工具得到发展。