Suppr超能文献

区域麻醉技术在大型肿瘤乳腺手术后患者术后镇痛中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing major oncologic breast surgeries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, MMIMSR, MM (DU), Mullana-Ambala, Ambala, India.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;69(4):527-549. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02183-z. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal regional technique to control pain after breast cancer surgery remains unclear. We sought to synthesize available data from randomized controlled trials comparing pain-related outcomes following various regional techniques for major oncologic breast surgery.

METHODS

In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched trials in PubMed, Embase Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar, from inception to 31 July 2020, for commonly used regional techniques. The primary outcome was the 24-hr resting pain score measured on a numerical rating score of 0-10. We used surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to establish the probability of an intervention ranking highest. The analysis was performed using the Bayesian random effects model, and effect sizes are reported as 95% credible interval (Crl). We conducted cluster-rank analysis by combining 24-hr pain ranking with 24-hr opioid use or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine randomized controlled trials containing 11 different interventions in 5,686 patients were included. The SUCRA values of the interventions for 24-hr resting pain score were continuous paravertebral block (0.83), serratus anterior plane block (0.76), continuous wound infusion (0.76), single-level paravertebral block (0.68), erector spinae plane block (0.59), modified pectoral block (0.49), intercostal block (0.45), multilevel paravertebral block (0.41), wound infiltration (0.33), no intervention (0.12), and placebo (0.08). When compared with placebo, the continuous paravertebral block (mean difference, 1.26; 95% Crl, 0.43 to 2.12) and serratus anterior plane block (mean difference, 1.12; 95% Crl, 0.32 to 1.9) had the highest estimated probability of decreasing 24-hr resting pain scores. Cluster ranking analysis combining 24-hr resting pain scores and opioid use showed that most regional analgesia techniques were more effective than no intervention or placebo. Nevertheless, wound infiltration and continuous wound infusion may be the least effective active interventions for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Continuous paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block had a high probability of reducing pain at 24 hr after major oncologic breast surgery. The certainty of evidence was moderate to very low. Future studies should compare different regional anesthesia techniques, including surgeon-administered techniques such as wound infiltration or catheters. Trials comparing active intervention with placebo are unlikely to change clinical practice.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020198244); registered 19 October 2020.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌手术后控制疼痛的最佳区域技术仍不清楚。我们试图从比较各种主要肿瘤乳房手术的区域技术后疼痛相关结局的随机对照试验中综合现有数据。

方法

在系统评价和网络荟萃分析中,我们在 PubMed、Embase Scopus、Medline、Cochrane 中心和 Google Scholar 中检索了从成立到 2020 年 7 月 31 日的常用区域技术的试验。主要结局是使用数字评分 0-10 衡量的 24 小时静息疼痛评分。我们使用累积排序曲线下面积 (SUCRA) 来确定干预措施排名最高的概率。分析使用贝叶斯随机效应模型进行,效应大小以 95%可信区间 (Crl) 报告。我们通过将 24 小时疼痛排名与 24 小时阿片类药物使用或术后恶心和呕吐的发生率相结合来进行聚类排名分析。

结果

共纳入 79 项随机对照试验,包含 5686 例患者的 11 种不同干预措施。24 小时静息疼痛评分的干预措施的 SUCRA 值为连续椎旁阻滞 (0.83)、前锯肌平面阻滞 (0.76)、持续伤口输注 (0.76)、单水平椎旁阻滞 (0.68)、竖脊肌平面阻滞 (0.59)、改良胸大肌阻滞 (0.49)、肋间阻滞 (0.45)、多水平椎旁阻滞 (0.41)、伤口浸润 (0.33)、无干预 (0.12)和安慰剂 (0.08)。与安慰剂相比,连续椎旁阻滞 (平均差异,1.26;95% Crl,0.43 至 2.12) 和前锯肌平面阻滞 (平均差异,1.12;95% Crl,0.32 至 1.9) 具有降低 24 小时静息疼痛评分的最高估计概率。结合 24 小时静息疼痛评分和阿片类药物使用的聚类排名分析表明,大多数区域镇痛技术比无干预或安慰剂更有效。然而,伤口浸润和持续伤口输注可能是减轻术后恶心和呕吐最无效的主动干预措施。

结论

连续椎旁阻滞和前锯肌平面阻滞在主要肿瘤乳房手术后 24 小时有降低疼痛的高概率。证据的确定性为中等到极低。未来的研究应比较不同的区域麻醉技术,包括外科医生管理的技术,如伤口浸润或导管。比较活性干预与安慰剂的试验不太可能改变临床实践。

研究注册

PROSPERO(CRD42020198244);2020 年 10 月 19 日注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验