• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右半结肠切除术 D3 与 D2 淋巴结清扫术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

D3 Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy in Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2022 Jun;29(3):416-425. doi: 10.1177/15533506211060230. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1177/15533506211060230
PMID:35102792
Abstract

PURPOSE

D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer improves oncological outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare operation data, histopathological characteristics, perioperative conditions, and long-term survival after D3 and D2 lymphadenectomy in right hemicolectomy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles (up to March 31, 2020). Random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analysis models were used. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 and Stata version 15.1 were used for pooled estimates.

RESULTS

After screening 714 articles, 7 articles with a total of 1368 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with D2, D3 lymphadenectomy improves results in terms of blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -20.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] -28.19 to -13.16, < .01), harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 8.86, 95% CI 7.74 to 9.98, < .01), 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.03, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.43, < .01), 5-year OS (HR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.30, = .02), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.90, = .01). There was no significant difference regarding operation time, anastomosis leakage, wound infection, overall morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, length of dissected colon, and 3-year DFS ( >= .05).

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested in this review that D3 lymphadenectomy is superior to D2 lymphadenectomy in terms of blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year DFS. The conclusion must be drawn with caution due to the limited number of included studies. Further RCTs are needed for stronger evidence.

摘要

目的

右半结肠癌行 D3 淋巴结清扫可改善肿瘤学结局。本荟萃分析旨在比较右半结肠切除术行 D3 和 D2 淋巴结清扫术的手术资料、组织病理学特征、围手术期情况及长期生存情况。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 相关文献(截至 2020 年 3 月 31 日)。采用随机效应和固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用 Review Manager(RevMan)版本 5.3 和 Stata 版本 15.1 进行汇总估计。

结果

经过筛选 714 篇文章,有 7 篇文章共 1368 例患者符合纳入标准。与 D2 相比,D3 淋巴结清扫术在出血量(加权均数差[WMD] = -20.63,95%置信区间[CI] -28.19 至 -13.16,<0.01)、清扫淋巴结数量(WMD = 8.86,95%CI 7.74 至 9.98,<0.01)、3 年总生存(OS)(风险比[HR] = 2.03,95%CI 1.20 至 3.43,<0.01)、5 年 OS(HR = 2.22,95%CI 1.15 至 4.30,=0.02)和 5 年无病生存(DFS)(HR = 2.16,95%CI 1.19 至 3.90,=0.01)方面更具优势。手术时间、吻合口漏、伤口感染、总发病率、术后住院时间、死亡率、切除结肠长度和 3 年 DFS 方面无显著差异(>=0.05)。

结论

本综述认为,D3 淋巴结清扫术在出血量、清扫淋巴结数量、3 年 OS、5 年 OS 和 5 年 DFS 方面优于 D2 淋巴结清扫术。但由于纳入研究数量有限,该结论必须谨慎得出。需要进一步的 RCT 来提供更强有力的证据。

相似文献

1
D3 Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy in Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.右半结肠切除术 D3 与 D2 淋巴结清扫术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Innov. 2022 Jun;29(3):416-425. doi: 10.1177/15533506211060230. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Open compared with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性手术与腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术加中央淋巴结清扫术治疗结肠癌的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;18(7):O224-35. doi: 10.1111/codi.13385.
3
Extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.胃癌腺癌的淋巴结清扫范围。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD001964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001964.pub4.
4
Long-term oncologic outcome of D3 lymph node dissection for clinical stage 2/3 right-sided colon cancer.临床 2/3 期右半结肠癌行 D3 淋巴结清扫的长期肿瘤学结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 15;38(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04310-2.
5
Comparing complete mesocolic excision versus conventional colectomy for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较完整结肠系膜切除术与传统结肠癌切除术治疗结肠癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;47(4):732-737. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术行右半结肠切除术:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):979-993. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02853-8. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
The Radical Extent of lymphadenectomy - D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.淋巴结清扫的根治范围——D2 清扫术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的全结肠系膜切除术治疗右侧结肠癌(RELARC)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 8;17(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1710-9.
8
Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗横结肠癌:短期和长期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 May;41:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Lymphadenectomy extent and survival of patients with gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event data from randomized trials.胃腺癌患者淋巴结清扫范围与生存:来自随机试验时间事件数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 May;41(5):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) observational prospective multicenter study on lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy: Should anatomical variability of the right colic artery influence the surgical strategy?-CoDIG 2 database (ColonDx Italian Group).意大利内镜手术与新技术学会(SICE)关于右半结肠切除术淋巴结清扫的前瞻性多中心观察性研究:结肠右动脉的解剖变异是否应影响手术策略?-CoDIG 2数据库(意大利结肠疾病诊断小组)
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 4. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02312-z.
2
Comparing 5-Year Survival Rates Before and After Re-stratification of Stage I-III Right-Sided Colon Cancer Patients by Establishing the Presence/Absence of Occult Tumor Cells and Lymph Node Metastases in the Different Levels of Surgical Dissection.比较不同手术解剖层面隐匿性肿瘤细胞和淋巴结转移状态对 I-III 期右半结肠癌患者再分层前后 5 年生存率的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Oct;26(10):2201-2211. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05434-6. Epub 2022 Aug 29.