Chassin M R, Brook R H, Park R E, Keesey J, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Kahn K, Merrick N, Solomon D H
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 30;314(5):285-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601303140505.
We measured geographic differences in the use of medical and surgical services during 1981 by Medicare beneficiaries (age greater than or equal to 65) in 13 large areas of the United States. The average number of Medicare beneficiaries per site was 340,000. We found large and significant differences in the use of services provided by all medical and surgical specialties. Of 123 procedures studied, 67 showed at least threefold differences between sites with the highest and lowest rates of use. Use rates were not consistently high in one site, but rates for procedures used to diagnose and treat a specific disease varied together, as did alternative treatments for the same condition. These results cannot be explained by the actions of a small number of physicians. We do not know whether physicians in high-use areas performed too many procedures, whether physicians in low-use areas performed too few, or whether neither or both of these explanations are accurate. However, we do know that the differences are too large to ignore and that unless they are understood at a clinical level, uninformed policy decisions that have adverse effects on the health of the elderly may be made.
我们对1981年美国13个大区中医疗保险受益人(年龄大于或等于65岁)使用医疗和外科服务的地理差异进行了测量。每个地点医疗保险受益人的平均数量为34万。我们发现,所有医疗和外科专科提供的服务使用情况存在巨大且显著的差异。在研究的123种手术中,67种在使用频率最高和最低的地点之间显示出至少三倍的差异。使用频率在一个地点并非始终很高,但用于诊断和治疗特定疾病的手术频率会一起变化,同一病症的替代治疗也是如此。这些结果无法用少数医生的行为来解释。我们不知道高使用地区的医生是否进行了过多的手术,低使用地区的医生是否进行的手术过少,或者这两种解释是否都不准确。然而,我们确实知道这些差异太大不容忽视,而且除非在临床层面理解这些差异,否则可能会做出对老年人健康有不利影响的不明智政策决定。