• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用经济激励措施支持有 homelessness 和 mental illness 的成年人参与服务:关键利益相关者观点的定性分析。

Using financial incentives to support service engagement of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: A qualitative analysis of key stakeholder perspectives.

机构信息

General and Health Systems Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Health Services Research Program, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):984-993. doi: 10.1111/hex.13442. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13442
PMID:35104030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9122468/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Homelessness and mental illness are associated with poor service engagement, health and health service use outcomes. Existing literature suggests that financial incentives may effectively support service engagement of this population, but studies investigating key stakeholder perspectives are lacking. This study aimed to elicit, using qualitative methods, nuanced service user and provider experiences by using financial incentives to support service engagement among adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness.

METHODS

This qualitative study is part of a larger mixed-methods pragmatic trial of financial incentives (Coordinated Access to Care for the Homeless-Financial Incentives [CATCH-FI]) within a community-based brief case management programme (CATCH) in Toronto, Ontario. Twenty-two CATCH-FI participants were purposefully recruited to participate in in-depth, semi-structured interviews; five CATCH service providers participated in a focus group and seven key informants in individual interviews. Data collection occurred between April 2019 and December 2020. All interviews and the focus group were audio-recorded and transcribed. Topic guides prompted participant perspectives on and experiences of using financial incentives to support engagement, health and well-being. Grounded theory and inductive thematic analysis guided coding and interpretation of transcripts. Triangulation and member-checking enhanced the analytical rigour and validity of findings.

RESULTS

CATCH service providers, key informants and subgroup of CATCH-FI participants perceived financial incentives to directly facilitate service engagement. The majority of CATCH-FI participants however highlighted that intrinsic motivation and service quality may be relatively more important facilitators of engagement. Most study participants across stakeholder groups perceived that financial incentives have direct positive influences on health and well-being in enabling access to basic needs and simple pleasures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that for some adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness, financial incentives can directly support service engagement. In addition, financial incentives may positively impact health and well-being by easing financial stress and enabling deeper attention to individual health needs. Further research on the effectiveness and acceptability of financial incentives is needed to improve understanding and uptake of a promising intervention to support health and health service use outcomes in an underserved population.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Study participants provided input into the study research questions, study design, interview guides and interpretation of findings.

摘要

引言

无家可归和精神疾病与较差的服务参与度、健康状况和卫生服务利用结果相关。现有文献表明,经济激励措施可能有效地支持这一人群的服务参与,但缺乏对关键利益相关者观点的研究。本研究旨在使用定性方法,通过经济激励措施来支持无家可归和精神疾病成年人的服务参与,细致地了解服务使用者和提供者的经验。

方法

本定性研究是安大略省多伦多市基于社区的短期个案管理方案(CATCH)内经济激励措施(协调为无家可归者提供的医疗保健服务-FI)的一项更大的混合方法实用试验的一部分。22 名 CATCH-FI 参与者被有目的地招募来参加深入的半结构化访谈;5 名 CATCH 服务提供者参加了焦点小组,7 名关键知情人参加了个人访谈。数据收集于 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月进行。所有访谈和焦点小组均进行了录音和转录。主题指南提示参与者对使用经济激励措施支持参与、健康和福祉的看法和经验。扎根理论和归纳主题分析指导了对转录本的编码和解释。三角测量和成员检查提高了分析的严谨性和结果的有效性。

结果

CATCH 服务提供者、关键知情人以及 CATCH-FI 参与者的一个亚组认为经济激励措施可以直接促进服务参与。然而,CATCH-FI 参与者中的大多数人强调,内在动机和服务质量可能是促进参与的相对更重要的因素。来自利益相关者群体的大多数研究参与者认为,经济激励措施通过满足基本需求和简单的乐趣,直接对健康和幸福感产生积极影响。

结论

我们的数据表明,对于一些无家可归和精神疾病的成年人来说,经济激励措施可以直接支持服务参与。此外,经济激励措施可以通过减轻经济压力和更深入地关注个人健康需求,对健康和幸福感产生积极影响。需要进一步研究经济激励措施的有效性和可接受性,以改善对支持服务不足人群健康和卫生服务利用结果的一种有前途的干预措施的理解和采用。

患者或公众参与

研究参与者为研究问题、研究设计、访谈指南和研究结果的解释提供了意见。

相似文献

1
Using financial incentives to support service engagement of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: A qualitative analysis of key stakeholder perspectives.利用经济激励措施支持有 homelessness 和 mental illness 的成年人参与服务:关键利益相关者观点的定性分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):984-993. doi: 10.1111/hex.13442. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
The acceptability of financial incentives to support service engagement of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: a qualitative study of key stakeholder perspectives Authorship.经济激励措施对支持无家可归和患有精神疾病的成年人参与服务的可接受性:主要利益相关者观点的定性研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Nov;49(6):1060-1071. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01217-y. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
The Impact of Financial Incentives on Service Engagement Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Illness: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol.经济激励措施对无家可归且患有精神疾病的成年人服务参与度的影响:一项实用试验方案
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 3;12:722485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722485. eCollection 2021.
4
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives in Case Management for Homeless Adults With Mental Illness.一项针对有精神疾病的无家可归成年患者的个案管理中使用经济激励措施的实用随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):823-829. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220392. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
5
Mechanisms of change and participant outcomes in a Recovery Education Centre for individuals transitioning from homelessness: a qualitative evaluation.从无家可归到康复教育中心过渡的个体的改变机制和参与者结果:一项定性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08614-8.
6
Using financial incentives to improve health service engagement and outcomes of adults experiencing homelessness: A scoping review of the literature.利用经济激励手段改善无家可归成年人对卫生服务的参与度和效果:文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3406-e3434. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13944. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
7
Contradictions hindering the provision of mental healthcare and psychosocial services to women experiencing homelessness in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: service providers' and programme coordinators' experiences and perspectives.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴无家可归妇女获得精神保健和心理社会服务的障碍:服务提供者和方案协调员的经验和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 1;23(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09810-z.
8
Bridging Hospital and Community Care for Homeless Adults with Mental Health Needs: Outcomes of a Brief Interdisciplinary Intervention.为有精神健康需求的无家可归成年人搭建医院和社区关怀的桥梁:一项简短跨学科干预的结果。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;63(11):774-784. doi: 10.1177/0706743718772539. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
Implementing a trauma-informed intervention for homeless female survivors of gender-based violence: Lessons learned in a large Canadian urban centre.实施基于创伤知情的干预措施,以帮助无家可归的基于性别的暴力女性幸存者:在加拿大一个大型城市中心的经验教训。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):823-832. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12913. Epub 2019 Dec 8.
10
Moving from rhetoric to reality: adapting Housing First for homeless individuals with mental illness from ethno-racial groups.从空谈走向实践:为有精神疾病的少数族裔无家可归者实施优先住房策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 2;12:345. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-345.

引用本文的文献

1
Service Engagement Among People Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Disorders: A Call for Person-centred Innovations.无家可归者与精神障碍患者的服务参与:呼吁以个人为中心的创新。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):285-288. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01418-7. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Experiences of conditional and unconditional cash transfers intended for improving health outcomes and health service use: a qualitative evidence synthesis.有条件和无条件现金转移以改善健康结果和卫生服务利用的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD013635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013635.pub2.
3
How COVID-19 has impacted access to healthcare and social resources among individuals experiencing homelessness in Canada: a scoping review.在加拿大,COVID-19 如何影响无家可归者获得医疗保健和社会资源:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):e058233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058233.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Financial Incentives on Service Engagement Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Illness: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol.经济激励措施对无家可归且患有精神疾病的成年人服务参与度的影响:一项实用试验方案
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 3;12:722485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722485. eCollection 2021.
2
Healthcare inequities and barriers to access for homeless individuals: a qualitative study in Barcelona (Spain).无家可归者的医疗保健不平等和获取障碍:巴塞罗那(西班牙)的一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01409-2.
3
Evaluating the Impact of a Critical Time Intervention Adaptation on Health Care Utilization among Homeless Adults with Mental Health Needs in a Large Urban Center.评估关键时间干预措施调整对大型城市中心有心理健康需求的无家可归成年人医疗利用的影响。
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;67(1):57-66. doi: 10.1177/0706743721996114. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
4
Health care for homeless people.为无家可归者提供的医疗保健服务。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jan 14;7(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00241-2.
5
Engaging Adults Experiencing Homelessness in Recovery Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Individual and Program Level Enabling Factors.让无家可归的成年人参与康复教育:对个人和项目层面促进因素的定性分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 6;11:779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00779. eCollection 2020.
6
Improving the Health of the Homeless and How to Achieve It within the New NHS Architecture.改善无家可归者的健康状况以及如何在新的国民保健制度架构内实现这一目标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;17(11):4100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114100.
7
"It's Me as a Person, Not Me the Disease": Patient Perceptions of an HIV Care Model Designed to Engage Persons with Complex Needs.“这是我作为一个人,而不是我患的病”:患者对旨在满足复杂需求患者的 HIV 护理模式的看法。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020 Jun;34(6):267-274. doi: 10.1089/apc.2019.0310.
8
Behavioural Economics and Human Decision Making: Instances from the Health Care System.行为经济学与人类决策:来自医疗保健系统的实例
Health Policy. 2020 Jun;124(6):659-664. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
9
Mechanisms of change and participant outcomes in a Recovery Education Centre for individuals transitioning from homelessness: a qualitative evaluation.从无家可归到康复教育中心过渡的个体的改变机制和参与者结果:一项定性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08614-8.
10
Acceptability of financial incentives for health-related behavior change: An updated systematic review.与健康相关行为改变的经济激励措施的可接受性:一项更新的系统评价。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105762. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105762. Epub 2019 Jul 2.