Yuan Shasha, Yin Tao, Weng Naijie, Wang Zheng, Yin Delu
Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking, No. 2 Yabao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Health Development Research Department, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Hum Resour Health. 2025 Jan 9;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00970-5.
Quantitative methods for estimating the workload of primary healthcare (PHC) workers are essential for improving the performance of PHC institutions. However, measuring the workload of PHC workers is challenging due to the diverse and complex range of services covered by PHC. This study aims to use an equivalent value (EV)-based approach to assess the workload of PHC workers and inform policymakers about the current workload burden in Beijing, China.
The EV-based workload assessment system was designed by three main steps: identifying the list of essential PHC service items provided by PHC workers, quantifying the EV of each service item, and calculating the corresponding workload for PHC workers and community health centers (CHCs). The study included 18 CHCs, which were divided into three groups based on population density and topography: Group I (eight urban CHCs), Group II (six CHCs in semi-mountainous areas), and Group III (four CHCs in mountainous areas). Data were collected from local health information system, which automatically collected real-time service volume data for 500 PHC service items at 18 CHCs in the sample district in Beijing from 2017 to 2021.
This study identified 503 essential PHC service items and defined their EVs. The theoretical full-capacity workload per PHC worker was 6024 EVs, serving as the base workload. The actual annual workload per PHC worker was 7240.0 EVs during 2017-2021. The base workload per budgeted position for the three types of CHCs was 6468.6 EVs for Group I, 5268.5 EVs for Group II, and 5038.7 EVs for Group III. Compared with the actual workload of 7702.3 EVs, 6568.3 EVs, and 5979.0 EVs in each group, respectively, all PHC workers in the sample district were overburdened during the study period.
The EV-based method provides a feasible solution for comprehensively assessing the workload of publicly funded PHC institutions in other regions. This study offers valuable insights to help local policymakers understand the workload burden of PHC workers, objectively evaluate their performance, and guide future health workforce planning.
定量评估基层医疗保健(PHC)工作者工作量的方法对于提高基层医疗机构的绩效至关重要。然而,由于基层医疗保健涵盖的服务种类繁多且复杂,衡量基层医疗保健工作者的工作量具有挑战性。本研究旨在采用基于等效值(EV)的方法来评估基层医疗保健工作者的工作量,并为政策制定者提供有关中国北京当前工作量负担的信息。
基于等效值的工作量评估系统通过三个主要步骤设计:确定基层医疗保健工作者提供的基本基层医疗保健服务项目清单,量化每个服务项目的等效值,并计算基层医疗保健工作者和社区卫生服务中心(CHC)的相应工作量。该研究包括18个社区卫生服务中心,根据人口密度和地形分为三组:第一组(8个城市社区卫生服务中心),第二组(6个半山区社区卫生服务中心)和第三组(4个山区社区卫生服务中心)。数据从当地卫生信息系统收集,该系统自动收集了2017年至2021年北京样本区18个社区卫生服务中心500项基层医疗保健服务项目的实时服务量数据。
本研究确定了503项基本基层医疗保健服务项目并定义了它们的等效值。每位基层医疗保健工作者的理论满负荷工作量为6024个等效值,作为基础工作量。2017 - 2021年期间,每位基层医疗保健工作者的实际年工作量为7240.0个等效值。三类社区卫生服务中心每个预算职位的基础工作量,第一组为6468.6个等效值,第二组为5268.5个等效值,第三组为5038.7个等效值。与每组实际工作量分别为7702.3个等效值、6568.3个等效值和5979.0个等效值相比,样本区所有基层医疗保健工作者在研究期间负担过重。
基于等效值的方法为全面评估其他地区公共资助的基层医疗机构的工作量提供了可行的解决方案。本研究提供了有价值的见解,以帮助当地政策制定者了解基层医疗保健工作者的工作量负担,客观评估他们的绩效,并指导未来的卫生人力规划。