• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

几何变形对光子和质子治疗计划剂量偏差的影响。

Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Mar;23(3):e13517. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13517. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.13517
PMID:35106908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906217/
Abstract

We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance-only treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) was applied in the computed tomography image and the structure set of each patient through a polynomial MRI geometric distortion model to simulate MRI-based treatment planning. A 3D histogram was generated to specify the relationship of dose deviation to geometric distortion and dose gradient. When the dose gradient (G ) approached zero, the maximum dose deviation reached 1.64% and 2.71% for photon plans of sequences A and B, respectively. For proton plans, the maximum dose deviation reached 3.15% and 4.89% for sequences A and B, respectively. When the geometric distortion (d) was close to zero, the maximum dose deviation was less than 0.8% for photon and proton plans of both sequences. Under extreme conditions (d = 2 mm and G  = 4.5%/mm), the median value of dose deviation reached 3% and 3.49% for photon and proton plans, respectively for sequence A, and 2.93% and 4.55% for photon and proton plans, respectively, for sequence B. We demonstrate that the dose deviation is specific to MRI hardware parameters. Compared to the photon plan, the proton plan is more sensitive to the changes in geometric distortion. For typical clinical MRI geometric distortion (d ≤2 mm), the median dose deviation is expected to be within 3% and 5% for photon and proton plans, respectively.

摘要

我们研究了与磁共振仅适形调强放疗和质子治疗计划相关的几何变形和剂量梯度的剂量偏差。通过多项式磁共振几何变形模型,将两种不同磁共振成像(MRI)序列(A)和(B)的残余几何变形应用于计算机断层扫描图像和每个患者的结构集,以模拟基于 MRI 的治疗计划。生成了一个 3D 直方图来指定剂量偏差与几何变形和剂量梯度的关系。当剂量梯度(G)接近零时,序列 A 和 B 的光子计划的最大剂量偏差分别达到 1.64%和 2.71%。对于质子计划,序列 A 和 B 的最大剂量偏差分别达到 3.15%和 4.89%。当几何变形(d)接近零时,光子和质子计划的最大剂量偏差均小于序列 A 和 B 的 0.8%。在极端条件下(d=2mm 和 G=4.5%/mm),序列 A 的光子和质子计划的剂量偏差中位数分别达到 3%和 3.49%,序列 B 的光子和质子计划的剂量偏差中位数分别达到 2.93%和 4.55%。我们证明了剂量偏差是特定于 MRI 硬件参数的。与光子计划相比,质子计划对几何变形的变化更敏感。对于典型的临床 MRI 几何变形(d≤2mm),光子和质子计划的中位剂量偏差预计分别在 3%和 5%以内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/bd2dda6dd426/ACM2-23-e13517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/b6736da31412/ACM2-23-e13517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/02ba24afbd52/ACM2-23-e13517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/f5a92e107b7d/ACM2-23-e13517-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/bd2dda6dd426/ACM2-23-e13517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/b6736da31412/ACM2-23-e13517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/02ba24afbd52/ACM2-23-e13517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/f5a92e107b7d/ACM2-23-e13517-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4499/8906217/bd2dda6dd426/ACM2-23-e13517-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans.几何变形对光子和质子治疗计划剂量偏差的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Mar;23(3):e13517. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13517. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
A methodology to investigate the impact of image distortions on the radiation dose when using magnetic resonance images for planning.一种用于研究在使用磁共振图像进行计划时图像失真对辐射剂量影响的方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Apr 5;63(8):085005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab5c3.
3
Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.仅使用磁共振成像(MRI)进行脑癌和前列腺癌质子治疗计划的可行性:替代CT图像中的剂量计算准确性
Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4634. doi: 10.1118/1.4958677.
4
Dosimetric impact of geometric distortions in an MRI-only proton therapy workflow for lung, liver and pancreas.MRI 引导质子治疗肺癌、肝癌和胰腺癌中的几何变形对剂量学的影响。
Z Med Phys. 2022 Feb;32(1):85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.一项蒙特卡洛研究,旨在评估1.5T磁场对前列腺癌笔形束扫描质子放疗计划整体稳健性的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Oct 19;62(21):8470-8482. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa8de9.
6
Evaluation of proton and photon dose distributions recalculated on 2D and 3D Unet-generated pseudoCTs from T1-weighted MR head scans.基于 T1 加权头部磁共振扫描的二维和三维 U-Net 生成的伪 CT 对质子和光子剂量分布的重新计算评估。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1429-1434. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1630754. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy.碳离子、质子和光子放射治疗中腹部和盆腔肿瘤大网膜间隔器剂量学影响的计算机模拟比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov 21;14(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1411-0.
8
Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study.质子束放疗与分割立体定向放疗治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的比较研究
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):373-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.057.
9
Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma.用于点扫描质子治疗的治疗计划系统的基准测试:对头盖骨底部脑膜瘤的光子调强放射治疗(IMRT)和质子散射箔均匀剂量(SFUD)治疗计划设置误差的稳健性比较与分析
Med Phys. 2014 Nov;41(11):111710. doi: 10.1118/1.4897571.
10
Prospective MRI-based imaging study to assess feasibility of proton therapy for post-prostatectomy radiation.基于磁共振成像(MRI)的前瞻性影像学研究,以评估前列腺切除术后放疗质子治疗的可行性。
Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):828-33. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1161826. Epub 2016 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality assurance and temporal stability of a 1.5 T MRI scanner for MR-guided Photon and Particle Therapy.用于磁共振引导光子和粒子治疗的1.5T磁共振成像扫描仪的质量保证和时间稳定性
Z Med Phys. 2025 May;35(2):204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Technical overview of magnetic resonance fingerprinting and its applications in radiation therapy.磁共振指纹成像技术及其在放射治疗中的应用技术概述。
Med Phys. 2022 Apr;49(4):2846-2860. doi: 10.1002/mp.15254. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-Guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation.1.5T磁共振直线加速器系统上每日磁共振引导的头颈部癌自适应放射治疗的初步可行性和临床应用:技术创新的前瞻性R-IDEAL 2a/2b系统临床评估
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1606-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.015. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
Correcting geometric image distortions in slice-based 4D-MRI on the MR-linac.
基于 MR 直线加速器的基于切片的 4D-MRI 中的几何图像失真校正。
Med Phys. 2019 Jul;46(7):3044-3054. doi: 10.1002/mp.13602. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
4
A methodology to investigate the impact of image distortions on the radiation dose when using magnetic resonance images for planning.一种用于研究在使用磁共振图像进行计划时图像失真对辐射剂量影响的方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Apr 5;63(8):085005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab5c3.
5
Systematic Review of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methodologies for Use in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Radiation Therapy.用于仅磁共振成像的放射治疗的合成计算机断层扫描生成方法的系统评价
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jan 1;100(1):199-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.043. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
6
Two-and-a-half-year clinical experience with the world's first magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.全球首台磁共振成像引导放射治疗系统的两年半临床经验。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;2(3):485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.006. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
7
A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy.仅基于磁共振成像(MRI)的放射治疗中替代CT生成的综述。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0747-y.
8
Dosimetric characterization of MRI-only treatment planning for brain tumors in atlas-based pseudo-CT images generated from standard T1-weighted MR images.基于标准T1加权磁共振图像生成的图谱伪CT图像中脑肿瘤仅磁共振成像治疗计划的剂量学特征分析
Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6557. doi: 10.1118/1.4967480.
9
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI detects acute radiotherapy-induced alterations in mandibular microvasculature: prospective assessment of imaging biomarkers of normal tissue injury.动态对比增强 MRI 检测下颌骨微血管急性放射诱导改变:正常组织损伤影像学生物标志物的前瞻性评估。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 8;6:29864. doi: 10.1038/srep29864.
10
Spatial Precision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Role of Geometric Distortion.磁共振成像引导放射治疗中的空间精度:几何畸变的作用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jul 15;95(4):1304-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.059. Epub 2016 Mar 2.