McDonald Brigid A, Vedam Sastry, Yang Jinzhong, Wang Jihong, Castillo Pamela, Lee Belinda, Sobremonte Angela, Ahmed Sara, Ding Yao, Mohamed Abdallah S R, Balter Peter, Hughes Neil, Thorwarth Daniela, Nachbar Marcel, Philippens Marielle E P, Terhaard Chris H J, Zips Daniel, Böke Simon, Awan Musaddiq J, Christodouleas John, Fuller Clifton D
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1606-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.015. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
This prospective study is, to our knowledge, the first report of daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer (HNC) using a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator (MR-linac) with particular focus on safety and feasibility and dosimetric results of an online rigid registration-based adapt to position (ATP) workflow.
Ten patients with HNC received daily ART on a 1.5T/7MV MR-linac, 6 using ATP only and 4 using ATP with 1 offline adapt-to-shape replan. Setup variability with custom immobilization masks was assessed by calculating the mean systematic error (M), standard deviation of the systematic error (Σ), and standard deviation of the random error (σ) of the isocenter shifts. Quality assurance was performed with a cylindrical diode array using 3%/3 mm γ criteria. Adaptive treatment plans were summed for each patient to compare the delivered dose with the planned dose from the reference plan. The impact of dosimetric variability between adaptive fractions on the summation plan doses was assessed by tracking the number of optimization constraint violations at each individual fraction.
The random errors (mm) for the x, y, and z isocenter shifts, respectively, were M = -0.3, 0.7, 0.1; Σ = 3.3, 2.6, 1.4; and σ = 1.7, 2.9, 1.0. The median (range) γ pass rate was 99.9% (90.9%-100%). The differences between the reference and summation plan doses were -0.61% to 1.78% for the clinical target volume and -11.74% to 8.11% for organs at risk (OARs), although an increase greater than 2% in OAR dose only occurred in 3 cases, each for a single OAR. All cases had at least 2 fractions with 1 or more constraint violations. However, in nearly all instances, constraints were still met in the summation plan despite multiple single-fraction violations.
Daily ART on a 1.5T MR-linac using an online ATP workflow is safe and clinically feasible for HNC and results in delivered doses consistent with planned doses.
据我们所知,这项前瞻性研究是关于使用1.5T磁共振成像-直线加速器(MR直线加速器)对头颈部癌(HNC)进行每日自适应放射治疗(ART)的首份报告,特别关注基于在线刚性配准的适应位置(ATP)工作流程的安全性、可行性和剂量学结果。
10例HNC患者在1.5T/7MV MR直线加速器上接受每日ART,6例仅使用ATP,4例使用ATP并进行1次离线适应形状重新计划。通过计算等中心位移的平均系统误差(M)、系统误差的标准差(Σ)和随机误差的标准差(σ),评估定制固定面罩的设置变异性。使用圆柱形二极管阵列,按照3%/3mm γ标准进行质量保证。将每位患者的自适应治疗计划相加,以比较实际 delivered 剂量与参考计划的计划剂量。通过跟踪每个单独分次中优化约束违反的次数,评估自适应分次之间剂量学变异性对总计划剂量的影响。
等中心在x、y和z方向位移的随机误差(mm)分别为:M = -0.3、0.7、0.1;Σ = 3.3、2.6、1.4;σ = 1.7、2.9、1.0。γ通过率的中位数(范围)为99.9%(90.9%-100%)。临床靶体积的参考计划剂量与总计划剂量之间的差异为-0.61%至1.78%,危及器官(OARs)的差异为-11.74%至8.11%,不过仅3例OAR剂量增加超过2%,且每例仅涉及单个OAR。所有病例至少有2个分次存在1次或更多约束违反情况。然而,几乎在所有情况下,尽管单个分次存在多次违反,但总计划仍满足约束条件。
在1.5T MR直线加速器上使用在线ATP工作流程对HNC进行每日ART是安全且临床可行的,并且实际 delivered 剂量与计划剂量一致。