Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (D.K., E.J., H.T.Y., T.-H.K., J.-S.U., J.-Y.K., H.-N.P., M.-H.L.' B.J.).
Department of Cardiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (P.S.Y., J.-H.S.).
Stroke. 2022 Jun;53(6):1873-1882. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036757. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are less likely to receive anticoagulation than nonfrail patients with AF despite frailty being associated with poorer clinical outcomes including stroke. Using a population-based cohort, we sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in frail patients with AF.
This retrospective cohort study analyzed 83 635 patients aged at least 65 years with AF and frailty (≥5 Hospital Frailty Risk Score) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. To account for the differences between patients receiving OAC or not and across different OAC regimens, propensity score-weighting was used. Net adverse clinical event, defined as the first event of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death, was compared. In addition, each individual outcome was examined separately.
In the study population (57.1% women; mean age, 78.5±7.2 years), a total of 14 968 net adverse clinical event, 3718 ischemic stroke, 5536 major bleeding, and 6188 cardiovascular death occurred. In comparison with no OAC use, OAC use was associated with lower risks of net adverse clinical event (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.82]), ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]), and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.49-0.55]), but no difference was observed for major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.10]). Compared with warfarin, all four individual direct OAC were associated with decreased risks of net adverse clinical event, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and cardiovascular death. The associations for OAC use (compared to no OAC use) or direct OAC use (compared to warfarin) with favorable outcomes were more prominent in individuals with a higher CHADS-VASc score of at least 3.
Among frail patients with AF, OAC treatment was associated with a positive net clinical outcome. Direct OACs provided lower incidences of stroke, bleeding, and mortality, compared with warfarin.
尽管虚弱与较差的临床结局(包括中风)相关,但患有房颤 (AF) 的虚弱患者接受抗凝治疗的可能性低于非虚弱患者。本研究使用基于人群的队列,旨在评估口服抗凝剂 (OAC) 在患有 AF 的虚弱患者中的疗效和安全性。
本回顾性队列研究分析了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间来自韩国国家健康保险服务数据库中年龄至少 65 岁且患有 AF 和衰弱(≥5 分医院衰弱风险评分)的 83635 例患者。为了考虑到接受 OAC 或不接受 OAC 治疗的患者之间以及不同 OAC 方案之间的差异,使用了倾向评分加权。比较了净不良临床事件(定义为首次发生缺血性中风、大出血或心血管死亡的事件)。此外,分别检查了每个个体结局。
在研究人群中(57.1%为女性;平均年龄 78.5±7.2 岁),共发生 14968 例净不良临床事件、3718 例缺血性中风、5536 例大出血和 6188 例心血管死亡。与不使用 OAC 相比,使用 OAC 与较低的净不良临床事件风险相关(风险比,0.78[95%CI,0.75-0.82])、缺血性中风(风险比,0.91[95%CI,0.86-0.97])和心血管死亡(风险比,0.52[95%CI,0.49-0.55]),但大出血无差异(风险比,1.02[95%CI,0.95-1.10])。与华法林相比,所有四种直接 OAC 与降低净不良临床事件、缺血性中风、大出血和心血管死亡的风险相关。与不使用 OAC 相比,OAC 使用(与不使用 OAC 相比)或直接 OAC 使用(与华法林相比)与较高的 CHADS-VASc 评分(至少 3 分)的个体的良好结局相关更为显著。
在患有 AF 的虚弱患者中,OAC 治疗与积极的净临床结局相关。与华法林相比,直接 OAC 可降低中风、出血和死亡率的发生率。