Suppr超能文献

口服抗凝药与≥80 岁合并心房颤动成人的结局:一项全球联合健康网络分析。

Oral anticoagulants and outcomes in adults ≥80 years with atrial fibrillation: A global federated health network analysis.

机构信息

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool & Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Aug;70(8):2386-2392. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17884. Epub 2022 May 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine associations between use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and stroke and bleeding-related outcomes for older people ≥80 years with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to determine trends over time in prescribing of OAC for this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. People aged ≥80 years with AF receiving (1) no OAC; (2) warfarin; or (3) a non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) between 2011 and 2019 were included. Propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts (no OAC, warfarin or a NOAC) on characteristics including age, sex, ethnicity, and co-morbidities. Cox proportional hazard models were used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The proportion of people aged ≥80 years receiving any OAC increased from 32.4% (n = 27,647) in 2011 to 43.6% (n = 110,412) in 2019. After propensity score matching, n = 169,067 individuals were included in the cohorts receiving no OAC or a NOAC. Compared to no OAC, participants receiving a NOAC had a lower risk of incident dementia (hazHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71), all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48-0.50), first-time ischaemic stroke (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91), and a higher risk of major bleeding (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11). Compared to participants receiving warfarin, participants receiving a NOAC had a lower risk of dementia (HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.93), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.72-0.76), ischaemic stroke (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and major bleeding (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.90). Similar results were observed when only including people with additional bleeding risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of people aged ≥80 years receiving OAC has increased since the introduction of NOACs, but remains low. Use of a NOAC was associated with improved outcomes compared to warfarin, and compared to no OAC, except for a small but statistically significant higher risk of major bleeding.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定 80 岁以上患有房颤(AF)的老年人使用口服抗凝药(OAC)与卒中及出血相关结局之间的关联,并确定该人群中 OAC 处方的时间趋势。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入了 2011 年至 2019 年期间使用(1)未使用 OAC;(2)华法林;或(3)非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)的 80 岁以上 AF 患者。采用倾向评分匹配法对包括年龄、性别、种族和合并症在内的特征平衡队列(未使用 OAC、华法林或 NOAC)。采用 Cox 比例风险模型得出风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

80 岁以上人群使用任何 OAC 的比例从 2011 年的 32.4%(n=27647)增加到 2019 年的 43.6%(n=110412)。经过倾向评分匹配后,n=169067 名患者被纳入未使用 OAC 或使用 NOAC 的队列。与未使用 OAC 相比,使用 NOAC 的患者发生痴呆(危害比 0.68,95%CI 0.65-0.71)、全因死亡率(HR 0.49,95%CI 0.48-0.50)、首次缺血性卒中(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.83-0.91)的风险降低,大出血(HR 1.08,95%CI 1.05-1.11)的风险增加。与使用华法林的患者相比,使用 NOAC 的患者发生痴呆(HR 0.90,95%CI:0.86-0.93)、全因死亡率(HR 0.74,95%CI:0.72-0.76)、缺血性卒中(HR 0.86,95%CI:0.82-0.90)和大出血(HR 0.88,95%CI:0.85-0.90)的风险降低。当仅包括有额外出血风险因素的患者时,也观察到了类似的结果。

结论

自 NOAC 问世以来,80 岁以上人群使用 OAC 的比例有所增加,但仍较低。与华法林相比,使用 NOAC 与改善结局相关,与未使用 OAC 相比,除了大出血风险略有但统计学上显著增加外,其他结局均改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验