Baljepally Vinila S, Metheny William
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, United States.
Professor, Designated Institutional Official and Assistant Dean for Graduate Medical Education, Division of Education, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN 37920, United States.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2022 Apr;114(2):227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Rural populations have known challenges to both emergency and ambulatory care access resulting in delayed presentation and poorer outcomes for stroke and heart attack patients. Conditions such as diabetes and hypertension are known to be more common among rural populations. However, it is unclear whether there are any differences in underlying clinical factors and outcomes among patients presenting to a tertiary care center for advanced cardiac procedures from rural versus urban areas.
We sought to assess rural-urban disparities in baseline health factors and outcomes in patients presenting for cardiac procedures.
We performed a retrospective study of 1775 patients who presented directly or were transferred to University of Tennessee Medical Center between July 2018 to October 2019 from rural/Appalachian or urban areas for heart catheterization and stent procedures. We compared these rural to urban cardiac patients on baseline factors (diabetes, hypertension, stroke, vascular disease, prior bypass surgery and heart failure) and outcomes (number of patients receiving stents, procedure times, bleeding complications, and mortality).
Rural residents had more vascular disease, prior bypass surgery and worse outcomes requiring significantly more stents (8.55% vs 34.36%, P=<0.001; OR 5.51 CI 4.13 to 7.34), longer procedure times (14.86 ± 11.69 mins vs 12.59 ± 14.87 mins, P=0.04), and had more bleeding complications (1.6% vs 0.4%, p= < 0.001), and higher mortality (2.2% vs 0.7%, p= 0.02).
Our study identified rural-urban differences in baseline factors and procedural outcomes in patients presenting to a tertiary care center for cardiac procedures. Providers should anticipate that health disparities may be associated with more intervention and worse outcomes in their rural patients. Being aware of such differences may also help policy makers in directing health care funding to lower gaps in health care and access ultimately leading to better health outcomes.
农村人口在获得急诊和门诊护理方面面临诸多挑战,这导致中风和心脏病发作患者就诊延迟且预后较差。已知糖尿病和高血压等疾病在农村人口中更为常见。然而,从农村地区和城市地区到三级护理中心接受高级心脏手术的患者,其潜在临床因素和预后是否存在差异尚不清楚。
我们旨在评估接受心脏手术患者的基线健康因素和预后方面的城乡差异。
我们对2018年7月至2019年10月期间直接就诊或被转诊至田纳西大学医学中心的1775例患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者来自农村/阿巴拉契亚地区或城市地区,接受心脏导管插入术和支架手术。我们比较了这些农村和城市心脏病患者的基线因素(糖尿病、高血压、中风、血管疾病、既往搭桥手术和心力衰竭)和预后(接受支架的患者数量、手术时间、出血并发症和死亡率)。
农村居民血管疾病更多、既往有搭桥手术且预后更差,需要显著更多的支架(8.55%对34.36%,P<0.001;OR 5.51,CI 4.13至7.34),手术时间更长(14.86±11.69分钟对12.59±14.87分钟,P=0.04),出血并发症更多(1.6%对0.4%,p<0.001),死亡率更高(2.2%对0.7%,p=0.02)。
我们的研究确定了到三级护理中心接受心脏手术的患者在基线因素和手术预后方面的城乡差异。医疗服务提供者应预计到健康差异可能与农村患者更多的干预措施和更差的预后相关。意识到这些差异也可能有助于政策制定者将医疗保健资金用于缩小医疗保健差距和改善就医机会,最终实现更好的健康结果。