Bourne Donald S, Sun Zhaojun, Jacobs Bruce L, Drake Coleman, Kahn Jeremy M, Roberts Eric T, Sabik Lindsay M
Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun;60(3):e14442. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14442. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
This study aimed to measure the changes in rural hospital bypass for 11 common elective surgeries following the implementation of the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model (PARHM), a global budget payment model.
We leveraged a natural experiment arising from the phase-in of PHARM in Pennsylvania. We conducted a comparative interrupted time series analysis to assess changes in rural hospital bypass, comparing trends in rural hospital bypass among patients in hospital service areas (HSAs) with PARHM-participating hospitals to patients in control HSAs with hospitals eligible for but not participating in PARHM. Analyses accounted for staggered entry into PARHM and examined outcomes up to 4 years post-entry.
We used Pennsylvania all-payer visit-level inpatient discharge data (2016-2022) to measure rural hospital bypass, encompassing 175,138 surgeries.
The average bypass rate for elective surgeries was 59.9%, with an increasing trend observed during the study period. Overall, differential changes in bypass rates between PARHM-participating and control HSAs were not statistically significant, from a low of 0.53 percentage points (-8.17-9.22) among Cohort 2 HSAs and a high of 5.96 percentage points (-4.63-16.55) among Cohort 1 HSAs. However, among critical access hospitals, PARHM participation was associated with a significant relative increase in levels and trends in bypass rates compared to controls, from a low of 9.12 percentage points (2.45-15.79) among Cohort 1 HSAs and a high of 29.70 percentage points (12.54-46.86) among Cohort 2 HSAs. These relative increases were largely due to a stable rate in PARHM-participating HSAs and a marked decrease in control HSAs.
This study fills a gap in the relationship between global budgets and hospital bypass. Although PARHM did not broadly alter rural bypass rates overall, the differential increase in bypass among HSAs with CAHs participating in PARHM suggests meaningful effect heterogeneity, warranting further research and analysis of impacts on patient outcomes.
本研究旨在衡量在实施宾夕法尼亚农村卫生模式(PARHM,一种全球预算支付模式)后,11种常见择期手术的农村医院转诊情况的变化。
我们利用了宾夕法尼亚州逐步引入PARHM所产生的自然实验。我们进行了一项比较中断时间序列分析,以评估农村医院转诊的变化,比较医院服务区(HSA)中PARHM参与医院的患者与对照HSA中符合条件但未参与PARHM的医院的患者的农村医院转诊趋势。分析考虑了PARHM的交错进入情况,并研究了进入后长达4年的结果。
我们使用宾夕法尼亚州全支付方就诊级别的住院出院数据(2016 - 2022年)来衡量农村医院转诊情况,涵盖175,138例手术。
择期手术的平均转诊率为59.9%,在研究期间呈上升趋势。总体而言,PARHM参与医院和对照HSA之间转诊率的差异变化在统计学上不显著,第2组HSA中差异最低为0.53个百分点(-8.17 - 9.22),第1组HSA中差异最高为5.96个百分点(-4.63 - 16.55)。然而,在临界接入医院中,与对照组相比,PARHM参与与转诊率水平和趋势的显著相对增加相关,第1组HSA中差异最低为9.12个百分点(2.45 - 15.79),第2组HSA中差异最高为29.70个百分点(12.54 - 46.86)。这些相对增加主要是由于PARHM参与HSA中的转诊率稳定,而对照HSA中的转诊率显著下降。
本研究填补了全球预算与医院转诊关系方面的空白。尽管PARHM总体上并未广泛改变农村转诊率,但在有临界接入医院参与PARHM的HSA中,转诊率的差异增加表明存在有意义的效应异质性,需要进一步研究和分析对患者结局的影响。