Rynio Pawel, Wojtuń Maciej, Wójcik Łukasz, Kawa Miłosz, Falkowski Aleksander, Gutowski Piotr, Kazimierczak Arkadiusz
Department of Vascular Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Department of Radiology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Feb;12(2):1385-1396. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-529.
Advances in 3D printing technology allow us to continually find new medical applications. One of them is 3D printing of aortic templates to guide vascular surgeons or interventional radiologists to create fenestrations in the stent-graft surface for the implantation procedure called fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. It is believed that the use of 3D printing significantly improves the quality of modified fenestrated stent-grafts. However, the accuracy and reliability of personalized 3D printed models of aortic templates are not well established.
Thirteen 3D printed templates of the visceral aorta and sixteen of the aortic arch and their corresponding computer tomography of angiography images were included in this accuracy study. The 3D models were scanned in the same conditions on computed tomography (CT) and evaluated by three physicians experienced in vascular CT assessment. Model and patient CT measurements were performed at key landmarks to maintain quality for stent-graft modification, including side branches and aortic diameters. CT-scanned aortic templates were segmented, aligned with sourced patient data, and evaluated for the Hausdorff matrix. Next, Bland-Altman plots determined the degree of agreement.
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients values were more than 0.9 for all measurements of aortic diameters and aortic branches diameter in all landmark locations. Therefore, the reliability of the aortic templates was considered excellent. The Bland-Altman plots analysis indicated measurement biases of 0.05 to 0.47 for aortic arch templates and 0.06 to 0.38 for reno-visceral aortic templates. The arithmetic mean of Hausdorff's mean distances of the aortic arch templates was 0.47 mm (SD =0.06) and ranged from 0.34 to 0.58. The mean metrics for abdominal models was 0.24 mm (SD =0.03) and ranged from 0.21 to 0.31.
The printed models of 3D aortic templates are accurate and reliable, thus can be widely used in endovascular surgery and interventional radiology departments as aortic templates to guide the physician-modified fenestrated stent-graft fabrication.
3D打印技术的进步使我们能够不断发现新的医学应用。其中之一是3D打印主动脉模板,以指导血管外科医生或介入放射科医生在支架移植物表面创建开窗,用于名为开窗式血管腔内主动脉瘤修复的植入手术。据信,3D打印的使用显著提高了改良开窗式支架移植物的质量。然而,主动脉模板的个性化3D打印模型的准确性和可靠性尚未得到充分证实。
本准确性研究纳入了13个内脏主动脉的3D打印模板和16个主动脉弓的3D打印模板及其相应的血管造影计算机断层扫描图像。在相同条件下对3D模型进行计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,并由三位有血管CT评估经验的医生进行评估。在关键标志点进行模型和患者CT测量,以确保支架移植物改良的质量,包括侧支和主动脉直径。对CT扫描的主动脉模板进行分割,与原始患者数据对齐,并评估豪斯多夫矩阵。接下来,通过布兰德-奥特曼图确定一致性程度。
在所有标志点位置,主动脉直径和主动脉分支直径的所有测量的组内相关系数值均大于0.9。因此,主动脉模板的可靠性被认为是极好的。布兰德-奥特曼图分析表明,主动脉弓模板的测量偏差为0.05至0.47,肾-内脏主动脉模板的测量偏差为0.06至0.38。主动脉弓模板的豪斯多夫平均距离的算术平均值为0.47毫米(标准差=0.06),范围为0.34至0.58。腹部模型的平均指标为0.24毫米(标准差=0.03),范围为0.21至0.31。
3D主动脉模板的打印模型准确可靠,因此可在血管腔内手术和介入放射科广泛用作主动脉模板,以指导医生制作改良的开窗式支架移植物。