Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
Regional Fit for School Programme, Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), Manila, Philippines.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;51(2):219-227. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12729. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
Evidence for affordable and pragmatic programmes to address the burden of untreated tooth decay in children in low- and middle-income settings is limited. This study aimed to (1) assess the effect of a government-run, school-based daily group toothbrushing programme compared to standard school-based oral health education on the incidence of dental caries and odontogenic infections in Filipino children over a period of 3 years; and (2) assess the additional preventive effect of on-demand oral urgent treatment (OUT) and weekly fluoride gel application.
A cluster-randomized trial was conducted in Camiguin, Philippines. Schools in three regions were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups: The Essential Health Care Programme (EHCP), which includes daily toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste; EHCP plus twice-yearly access to on-demand urgent oral treatment (EHCP + OUT) and EHCP plus weekly application of high-concentrated fluoride gel (EHCP + Fluoride). Schools in a nearby province with a similar child population were selected as external concurrent control group. Clinical oral examinations were performed by calibrated dentists from a random sample of 682 seven-year-old students who were examined at baseline and over the following 3 years. Outcome variables were the number of decayed primary teeth, the number of decayed, missing and filled permanent teeth (DMFT) and surfaces (DMFS), and the number of permanent teeth with pulpal involvement, ulcerations, fistula or abscess (PUFA). Data were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression.
Three years after implementation, increments in dental caries and odontogenic infections in permanent teeth did not significantly differ between the EHCP and control group, yet the incidence of DMFT was lower by 22% in children receiving EHCP. Compared to controls, children receiving EHCP + Fluoride had a significantly lower increment of DMFT, DMFS and PUFA by 40%, 40% and 47%, respectively. Children receiving EHCP + OUT had lower incidence rates of DMFT and DMFS than control children by 23% and 28%, respectively. A lower incidence rate was also found for PUFA, but the effect was not statistically significant.
Findings suggest that the weekly application of fluoride gel and urgent oral treatment, in addition to daily school-based toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste, are realistic and effective strategies to lower the burden of dental caries in Filipino children. Implementation challenges may explain why no substantial caries-preventive benefits were demonstrated for school-based toothbrushing only. Intervention compliance should be considered in future programme implementation and evaluation research.
在中低收入国家,针对未治疗的儿童龋齿负担,有经济实惠且实用的方案,但相关证据有限。本研究旨在:(1)评估政府运行的、基于学校的每日集体刷牙方案与基于学校的标准口腔健康教育相比,对菲律宾儿童龋齿和牙源性感染发病率的影响,时间跨度为 3 年;(2)评估按需口腔紧急治疗(OUT)和每周氟化物凝胶应用的额外预防效果。
在菲律宾卡米金岛进行了一项整群随机试验。将三个区域的学校随机分为三组干预组之一:基本保健方案(EHCP),包括用含氟牙膏进行每日刷牙;EHCP 加每年两次的按需口腔紧急治疗机会(EHCP+OUT);EHCP 加每周应用高浓度氟化物凝胶(EHCP+Fluoride)。选择附近一个儿童人口相似的省份的学校作为外部同期对照组。由经过校准的牙医对 682 名 7 岁的随机样本学生进行临床口腔检查,这些学生在基线时和接下来的 3 年内接受了检查。结果变量为乳牙龋齿数、恒牙龋失补牙数(DMFT)和牙面数(DMFS)、以及有牙髓受累、溃疡、瘘管或脓肿(PUFA)的恒牙数。使用多级混合效应负二项式回归分析数据。
方案实施 3 年后,EHCP 组与对照组相比,恒牙龋齿和牙源性感染的增量无显著差异,但接受 EHCP 的儿童 DMFT 发生率降低了 22%。与对照组相比,接受 EHCP+Fluoride 的儿童 DMFT、DMFS 和 PUFA 的增量分别显著降低了 40%、40%和 47%。接受 EHCP+OUT 的儿童 DMFT 和 DMFS 的发生率比对照组儿童低 23%和 28%,PUFA 的发生率也较低,但效果无统计学意义。
研究结果表明,每周应用氟化物凝胶和紧急口腔治疗,加上基于学校的每日含氟牙膏刷牙,是降低菲律宾儿童龋齿负担的现实而有效的策略。没有发现仅基于学校的刷牙方案有实质性的防龋益处,这可能是因为实施方面的挑战。在未来的方案实施和评估研究中,应考虑干预措施的依从性。