Department of Child and Family Welfare, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Apr;51(4):659-672. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01578-5. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
Effectiveness research on depression prevention usually compares pre- to post-intervention outcomes across groups, but this aggregation across individuals may mask heterogeneity in symptom change trajectories. Hence, this study aimed to identify subgroups of adolescents with unique trajectories of change in a school-based depression prevention trial. It was also examined how trajectory membership was associated with the intervention conditions, depressive symptoms at 12-month follow-up, and baseline predictors. Hundred-ninety adolescent girls (M = 13.34; range = 11-16 years) with subclinical depression at screening (M = 57 days before pre-test) were allocated to four conditions: a face-to-face, group-based program (OVK), a computerized, individual program (SPARX), OVK and SPARX combined, and a monitoring control condition. Growth Mixture Modeling was used to identify the distinct trajectories during the intervention period using weekly depressive symptom assessments from pre-test to post-test. Analyses revealed three trajectories of change in the full sample: Moderate-Declining (62.1% of the sample), High-Persistent (31.1%), and Deteriorating-Declining (6.8%) trajectories. Trajectories were unrelated to the intervention conditions and the High-Persistent trajectory had worse outcomes at follow-up. Several baseline factors (depression severity, age, acceptance, rumination, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy) enabled discrimination between trajectories. It is concluded that information about likely trajectory membership may enable (school) clinicians to predict an individual's intervention response and timely adjust and tailor intervention strategies as needed.
预防抑郁症的效果研究通常比较干预前和干预后的组间结果,但这种个体间的聚合可能掩盖了症状变化轨迹的异质性。因此,本研究旨在确定基于学校的抑郁症预防试验中具有独特变化轨迹的青少年亚组。还检查了轨迹成员资格如何与干预条件、12 个月随访时的抑郁症状以及基线预测因素相关。在筛查时(在预测试前 57 天)有亚临床抑郁的 190 名少女(M = 13.34;范围 = 11-16 岁)被分配到四个条件:面对面的团体方案(OVK)、基于计算机的个体方案(SPARX)、OVK 和 SPARX 联合、以及监测对照条件。使用从预测试到后测试的每周抑郁症状评估,使用增长混合建模来识别干预期间的不同轨迹。分析显示,在全样本中存在三种变化轨迹:中度下降(样本的 62.1%)、高度持续(31.1%)和恶化下降(6.8%)轨迹。轨迹与干预条件无关,且高度持续轨迹在随访时的结果更差。几个基线因素(抑郁严重程度、年龄、接受度、反刍、灾难化和自我效能)能够区分轨迹。结论是,关于可能的轨迹成员资格的信息可以使(学校)临床医生预测个体的干预反应,并根据需要及时调整和定制干预策略。