Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2188, Japan.
Biosystems. 2022 Mar;213:104634. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104634. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
Quantum stochasticity carries two incompatible implications. One is for the statistical divergence upon the prior absence of complete controllability over boundary conditions applied to mechanistic causation. One more alternative is for the statistical convergence upon the posterior decidability of measurement despite the absence of the prior decidability. Decidable measurement lacking the prior decidability is retrocausal. The quantum physical likelihood for the life world may derive from the statistical convergence proceeding in a durable manner. This observation suggests that there must have been some type of observers even internal to the lifeless world, otherwise no likelihood of identifying the objects of interest could be available there. Measurement activity intrinsic to the internal observers is indexical, while the similar activity specific to the external observer like us can be symbolic. The difference is in the phenomenological qualification since both are the observers of different types. A most conspicuous case demonstrating the phenomenological difference is revealed in the different nature of time to be employed and experienced there. Time serves as a principal attribute qualifying the phenomenon to be experienced as such. Qualification of time is observer dependent.
量子随机性带来了两个相互矛盾的含义。一种是在机制因果关系施加的边界条件完全不可控的先验情况下,会出现统计上的发散。另一种是在测量的后验可判定性存在的情况下,即使在先验上不可判定,也会出现统计上的收敛。缺少先验判定的可判定测量是回溯因果关系。尽管生命世界的量子物理可能性可能源于持续进行的统计收敛,但这一观察结果表明,即使在无生命的世界内部,也一定存在某种类型的观察者,否则就不可能有确定感兴趣对象的可能性。内在观察者的测量活动是索引性的,而类似的活动对于我们这样的外部观察者来说则是象征性的。区别在于现象学的定性,因为它们是不同类型的观察者。一个最显著的例子揭示了这种现象学上的差异,表现在所使用和经历的时间的不同性质上。时间是作为一个主要属性,使所经历的现象具有这样的性质。时间的定性是依赖于观察者的。