Hart Harvi F, Patterson Brooke E, Crossley Kay M, Culvenor Adam G, Khan Michaela C M, King Matthew G, Sritharan Prasanna
La Trobe Sports and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Department of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Sports Med. 2022 May;56(9):521-530. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104686. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
To systematically review and synthesise patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) in healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (OA), during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises and with physical interventions (eg, foot orthotics, footwear, taping, bracing).
A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SportDiscus and Cochrane Library databases were searched.
Observational and interventional studies reporting PFJRF during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises, and physical interventions.
In healthy individuals, the weighted average of mean (±SD) peak PFJRF for everyday activities were: walking 0.9±0.4 body weight (BW), stair ascent 3.2±0.7 BW, stair descent 2.8±0.5 BW and running 5.2±1.2 BW. In those with patellofemoral pain, peak PFJRF were: walking 0.8±0.2 BW, stair ascent 2.5±0.5 BW, stair descent 2.6±0.5 BW, running 4.1±0.9 BW. Only single studies reported peak PFJRF during everyday activities in individuals with patellofemoral OA/articular cartilage defects (walking 1.3±0.5 BW, stair ascent 1.6±0.4 BW, stair descent 1.0±0.5 BW). The PFJRF was reported for many different exercises and physical interventions; however, considerable variability precluded any pooled estimates.
Everyday activities and exercises involving larger knee flexion (eg, squatting) expose the patellofemoral joint to higher PFJRF than those involving smaller knee flexion (eg, walking). There were no discernable differences in peak PFJRF during everyday activities between healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain/OA. The information on PFJRF may be used to select appropriate variations of exercises and physical interventions.
系统评价并综合分析健康个体、髌股关节疼痛患者以及骨关节炎(OA)患者在日常活动、治疗性锻炼和物理干预(如足部矫形器、鞋类、贴扎、支具)过程中的髌股关节反应力(PFJRF)。
一项采用荟萃分析的系统评价。
检索了Medline、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL、SportDiscus和Cochrane图书馆数据库。
报告日常活动、治疗性锻炼和物理干预过程中PFJRF的观察性和干预性研究。
在健康个体中,日常活动的平均(±标准差)峰值PFJRF的加权平均值为:步行0.9±0.4体重(BW),上楼梯3.2±0.7 BW,下楼梯2.8±0.5 BW,跑步5.2±1.2 BW。在髌股关节疼痛患者中,峰值PFJRF为:步行0.8±0.2 BW,上楼梯2.5±0.5 BW,下楼梯2.6±0.5 BW,跑步4.1±0.9 BW。仅有单项研究报告了髌股关节OA/关节软骨缺损患者日常活动中的峰值PFJRF(步行1.3±0.5 BW,上楼梯1.6±0.4 BW,下楼梯1.0±0.5 BW)。报告了许多不同锻炼和物理干预的PFJRF;然而,由于差异较大,无法进行任何汇总估计。
与涉及较小膝关节屈曲的活动(如步行)相比,涉及较大膝关节屈曲的日常活动和锻炼(如深蹲)会使髌股关节承受更高的PFJRF。健康个体与髌股关节疼痛/OA患者在日常活动中的峰值PFJRF没有明显差异。PFJRF的相关信息可用于选择合适的锻炼和物理干预方式变体。