• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术术后感染分析的对比研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Feb;9(2):949-957. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.34.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in women with high-risk HPV persistent infection after cervical conization.宫颈锥切术后高危型人乳头瘤病毒持续感染女性中5-氨基酮戊酸介导的光动力疗法的疗效和安全性评估
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Dec;40:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103144. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure . Cold Knife Cone in Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Review of 447 Cases.环形电切术。冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:447例病例回顾。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017 Nov;47(6):663-667.
4
The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(HSIL)患者残留病变及复发的危险因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12792. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012792.
5
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对于阴道镜检查结果不满意的女性,采用环形电切术而非冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Apr;21(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287.
6
Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的Meta分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jun 29;9:3907-15. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S108832. eCollection 2016.
7
Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冷刀锥切术与环形电切术治疗宫颈原位腺癌(ACIS)的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170587. eCollection 2017.
8
A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈发育异常的比较:后续子宫切除标本中的残留病变
Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Apr;73(1):12-5. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5300.
9
Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.单极电刀锥切术与环形电刀切除术治疗高级别鳞状上皮内病变的比较
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 20;8:721545. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.721545. eCollection 2021.
10
Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)切缘阳性的高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者的管理:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 21;100(20):e26030. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026030.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Prediction of Residual and Recurrent High-Grade CIN Post-LEEP.leep术后残留及复发性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的机器学习预测
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Sep 6;16:1175-1187. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S484057. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of cervical premalignant lesions.宫颈癌前病变的管理
Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 Mar-Apr;42(2):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
2
Antibiotics for infection prevention after excision of the cervical transformation zone.用于宫颈转化区切除术后预防感染的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 21;1(1):CD009957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009957.pub2.
3
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对于阴道镜检查结果不满意的女性,采用环形电切术而非冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Apr;21(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287.
4
Association between timing of cervical excision procedure to minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical complications.宫颈切除术与微创子宫切除术时间关联与手术并发症的关系。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.037. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
5
Regeneration Process After Cervical Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.宫颈上皮内瘤变行宫颈锥切术后的再生过程。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1258-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001755.
6
Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的Meta分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jun 29;9:3907-15. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S108832. eCollection 2016.
7
World Health Organization Guidelines for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 and screen-and-treat strategies to prevent cervical cancer.世界卫生组织关于宫颈上皮内瘤变2-3级的治疗及预防宫颈癌的筛查与治疗策略指南。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):252-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
8
The influence of interval between conization and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical cancer.宫颈锥切术与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术间隔时间对宫颈癌患者发病率的影响。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(6):601-4.
9
A comparative study of efficacy and outcomes of large loop excision of the transformation zone procedure performed under general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia.全身麻醉与局部麻醉下进行的转化区大环形切除术的疗效和结果比较研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;52(2):128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01420.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
10
Comparison of success rate and complications of contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) with cold knife conization (CKC) in high grade lesion (HGL) from colposcopic impression.根据阴道镜印象,比较转化区环形切除术(C-LETZ)与冷刀锥切术(CKC)在高级别病变(HGL)中的成功率和并发症。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Dec;92(12):1573-9.

宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术术后感染分析的对比研究

A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

作者信息

Cai Liangzhi, Huang Yunmei, Lin Chaoqin, Liu Guifeng, Mao Xiaodan, Dong Binghua, Lu Ting, Sun Pengming

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.

Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China.

出版信息

Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Feb;9(2):949-957. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.34.

DOI:10.21037/tcr.2019.12.34
PMID:35117440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8797846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is a premalignant condition of the cervical cancer. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold-knife conization (CKC) were the most effective treatment. Most studies focused on the recurrence rate, positive margin rate, residual disease rate, secondary hemorrhage or cervical stenosis of these two methods. At present, there are few researches about the post-operative infection comparing LEEP with CKC for treating HSIL.

METHODS

One hundred and fourteen patients diagnosed as HSIL were underwent cold conization (n=43) or LEEP (n=71), according to 1:2 matching approximately and being divided randomly into two groups. The information, including the post-operational inflammatory complications, the leucorrhea abnormalities, the pathogens isolated from cervical secretions and pathological reports, were collected for comparison.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between them in bleeding, diameter, depth or volume of tissue between two groups. However, the operation time of the CKC group (24.81±11.09) minutes was longer than that of LEEP group (15.79±9.82) minutes. Seventeen patients of the LEEP group were admitted postoperatively as emergencies for secondary-hemorrhage. But it did not happen in CKC group. During the follow-up period, 28 patients (CKC 8 . LEEP 20) were diagnosis as reproductive tract infections. Fourteen patients (CKC 6 . LEEP 8) had leucorrhea abnormalities. Eighteen patient (CKC 3 . LEEP 15) isolated pathogens from their cervical secretions. There was no significant correlation between leucorrhea abnormality and cervical secretion abnormality. The positive rate of cervical secretion infection in the LEEP group was higher than the CKC group (P<0.05). The inflammatory response and process had some pathological difference in post-operation time of two groups, especially in those secondary hemorrhage cases.

CONCLUSIONS

These two excision procedures for treating HSIL have their respective advantages and disadvantages. This study indicates that the incidence of persistent cervical infection after the CKC operation with Sturmdorf suturing is lower than that of after LEEP surgery. Clinicians should pay attention to the pathogen isolated from cervical post-operative secretion. It is conducive to find hidden pathogens and control subsequent surgical inflammation.

摘要

背景

高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)是宫颈癌的一种癌前病变状态。环形电切术(LEEP)和冷刀锥切术(CKC)是最有效的治疗方法。大多数研究聚焦于这两种方法的复发率、切缘阳性率、残留病灶率、继发性出血或宫颈狭窄情况。目前,关于LEEP与CKC治疗HSIL术后感染的研究较少。

方法

114例诊断为HSIL的患者,按照约1:2匹配并随机分为两组,分别接受冷刀锥切术(n = 43)或LEEP(n = 71)。收集包括术后炎症并发症、白带异常、宫颈分泌物分离出的病原体及病理报告等信息进行比较。

结果

两组在出血情况、组织直径、深度或体积方面无显著差异。然而,CKC组的手术时间(24.81±11.09)分钟长于LEEP组(15.79±9.82)分钟。LEEP组有17例患者术后因继发性出血作为急诊入院,而CKC组未发生。在随访期间,28例患者(CKC组8例,LEEP组20例)被诊断为生殖道感染。14例患者(CKC组6例,LEEP组8例)有白带异常。18例患者(CKC组3例,LEEP组15例)宫颈分泌物中分离出病原体。白带异常与宫颈分泌物异常之间无显著相关性。LEEP组宫颈分泌物感染阳性率高于CKC组(P<0.05)。两组术后不同时间的炎症反应及过程存在一些病理差异,尤其是在那些继发性出血的病例中。

结论

这两种治疗HSIL的切除手术各有优缺点。本研究表明,采用Sturmdorf缝合的CKC手术后持续性宫颈感染的发生率低于LEEP手术后。临床医生应关注宫颈术后分泌物中分离出的病原体,这有助于发现潜在病原体并控制后续手术炎症。