Lu Qian, Zhang Nannan, Wang Feiran, Chen Xiaojian, Chen Zhong
Department of General Surgery, Tongzhou People's Hospital, Nantong 226300, China.
Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 May;9(5):3324-3338. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.04.01.
The short- and long-term prognoses are unclear following laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a meta-analysis to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LMH . open major hepatectomy (OMH) in patients with HCC.
All studies comparing LMH with OMH for HCC published until April 2019 were identified independently by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We analyzed data for surgical and oncological outcomes, namely, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major complications, mortality, hospital stay, margin distance, negative margin rate, long-term overall survival, and corresponding disease-free survival (DFS).
We included 13 studies involving 1,225 patients with HCC (LMH: 534 patients; OMH: 691 patients) in the meta-analysis. Regarding short-term outcomes, the pooled data showed that LMH was associated with longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 72.14 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 43.07-101.21; P<0.00001], less blood loss (WMD: -102.32 mL; 95% CI: -150.99 to -53.64; P<0.0001), shorter hospital stay (WMD: -3.77 d; 95% CI: -4.95 to -2.60; P<0.00001), lower morbidity [risk difference (RD): -0.01; 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.06; P<0.00001], and lower major complication rates (RD: -0.08; 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.05; P<0.00001). However, the need for blood transfusion (RD: -0.01; 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.05; P=0.78), mortality (RD: -0.01; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.01; P=0.57), margin distance (WMD: 0.05 mm; 95% CI: -0.1 to 0.19; P=0.52), and negative margin rate (RD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.05; P=0.65) were significantly comparable between the two groups. Regarding long-term outcomes, there was no difference in 3-year DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.37; P=0.95], 3-year overall survival (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.70-2.21; P=0.45), 5-year DFS (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.64-1.38; P=0.76), and 5-year overall survival (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.45-1.99; P=0.88).
LMH can be performed as safely as OMH in select patients and provides improved short-term surgical outcomes without affecting long-term survival. However, confirming our results requires more evidence from high-quality and prospective randomized controlled trials.
肝细胞癌(HCC)患者接受腹腔镜下大肝切除术(LMH)后的短期和长期预后尚不清楚。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较HCC患者接受LMH与开放性大肝切除术(OMH)的手术及肿瘤学结局。
通过检索PubMed、Embase、科学网和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,独立识别截至2019年4月发表的所有比较LMH与OMH治疗HCC的研究。我们分析了手术和肿瘤学结局的数据,即手术时间、术中失血量、输血率、术后发病率、主要并发症、死亡率、住院时间、切缘距离、阴性切缘率、长期总生存率以及相应的无病生存率(DFS)。
我们纳入了13项研究,共1225例HCC患者(LMH组:534例患者;OMH组:691例患者)进行荟萃分析。关于短期结局,汇总数据显示,LMH与更长的手术时间相关[加权均数差(WMD):72.14分钟;95%置信区间(CI):43.07 - 101.21;P < 0.00001],失血量更少(WMD: - 102.32毫升;95% CI: - 150.99至 - 53.64;P < 0.0001),住院时间更短(WMD: - 3.77天;95% CI: - 4.95至 - 2.60;P < 0.00001),发病率更低[风险差(RD): - 0.01;95% CI: - 0.16至 - 0.06;P < 0.00001],主要并发症发生率更低(RD: - 0.08;95% CI: - 0.11至 - 0.05;P < 0.00001)。然而,两组之间的输血需求(RD: - 0.01;95% CI: - 0.06至0.05;P = 0.78)、死亡率(RD: -