• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于胰腺良性和低级别恶性病变,与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术相比,机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术可提高脾脏保留率。

Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas.

作者信息

Jiang Yabo, Zheng Kailian, Zhang Shichao, Shao Zhuo, Cheng Peng, Zhang Yijie, Jin Gang, He Tianlin

机构信息

Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Sep;9(9):5166-5172. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2121.

DOI:10.21037/tcr-19-2121
PMID:35117883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8798076/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for patients with benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas.

METHODS

This study included 166 patients who underwent RDP (n=63) or LDP (n=103) for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas from January 2011 to October 2018 in Changhai Hospital. A retrospective analysis was performed between the two groups. The primary points were operation time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, pancreatic fistula and spleen preservation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or indications between RDP and LDP. Notably, among all patients, RDP was associated with a significantly higher rate of spleen preservation than that for LDP (30.2% 6.8%, P<0.001), while other intraoperative variables were similar between the two groups. No death cases in the study group within 30 days were reported in either group. Referring to postoperative outcomes, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 22% for the RDP group and 33% for the LDP group. In addition, the rate of clinically significant grade B/C pancreatic fistula was 5% and 7%, respectively. There were also no significant differences in hospital stay (6.0±3.0 6.4±2.5, P=0.404). Furthermore, the univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size (P=0.001) and surgery group (RDP/LDP) (P=0.002) were associated with SP rate independent factor for spleen preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

RDP is an effective and safe technique with significant advantage in spleen preservation for patients with benign and low-grade malignant lesions in the distal pancreas.

摘要

背景

本回顾性研究旨在比较机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(RDP)与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)治疗胰腺良性和低度恶性病变患者的效果。

方法

本研究纳入了2011年1月至2018年10月在长海医院因胰腺良性或低度恶性病变接受RDP(n = 63)或LDP(n = 103)的166例患者。对两组进行回顾性分析。主要观察指标为手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、胰瘘和脾脏保留情况。

结果

RDP组和LDP组患者的特征及适应证无显著差异。值得注意的是,在所有患者中,RDP组的脾脏保留率显著高于LDP组(30.2%对6.8%,P < 0.001),而两组间其他术中变量相似。两组均未报告研究组30天内死亡病例。关于术后结果,RDP组术后胰瘘(POPF)发生率为22%,LDP组为33%。此外,临床显著的B/C级胰瘘发生率分别为5%和7%。住院时间也无显著差异(6.0±3.0对6.4±2.5,P = 0.404)。此外,单因素分析表明肿瘤大小(P = 0.001)和手术组(RDP/LDP)(P = 0.002)是与脾脏保留率相关的独立因素。

结论

对于远端胰腺良性和低度恶性病变患者,RDP是一种有效且安全的技术,在脾脏保留方面具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas.对于胰腺良性和低级别恶性病变,与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术相比,机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术可提高脾脏保留率。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Sep;9(9):5166-5172. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2121.
2
[Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study].[机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项回顾性单中心研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;57(2):102-107. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.02.006.
3
A Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Benign or Malignant Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗良恶性病变的比较:Meta 分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Dec;33(12):1146-1153. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0231. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:法国单中心前瞻性经验及成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Comparison between robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant tumours located in the neck of the pancreas: A propensity score matched study.机器人辅助胰体中部切除术与机器人辅助胰尾部切除术治疗胰腺颈部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2219. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2219. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
6
Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?在开放手术、腹腔镜手术或机器人手术中,哪种远端胰腺切除术方法具有成本效益?
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Oct;7(5):345-352. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.09.03.
7
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a case-matched cost-analysis between robot-assisted surgery and direct manual laparoscopy.微创远端胰腺切除术:机器人辅助手术与直接手动腹腔镜手术的病例匹配成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):651-662. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08332-1. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:一项包括患者亚组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4131-4143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09894-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
9
ROBOTIC ASSISTED VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项回顾性研究。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023 Dec 8;36:e1783. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020230065e1783. eCollection 2023.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005-2018.传统腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术治疗恶性肿瘤的短期疗效:来自美国国家住院患者样本(2005 - 2018年)的证据
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;16(5):1003. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051003.
2
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:一项包括患者亚组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4131-4143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09894-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of vessel preservation on splenic volume and function in patients with spleen preserving distal pancreatectomies.血管保留对保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术患者脾脏体积和功能的影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Nov;22(11):1563-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Long-Term Outcomes after Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Study Group.保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的长期疗效:美国神经内分泌研究组的研究结果。
Neuroendocrinology. 2021;111(1-2):129-138. doi: 10.1159/000506399. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):7-21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01413-3. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的成本效果分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Apr;16(2):e2080. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2080. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
A retrospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal resection and enucleation for potentially benign pancreatic neoplasms.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗潜在良性胰腺肿瘤的远端切除与剜除术的回顾性比较
Surg Today. 2020 Aug;50(8):872-880. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01966-z. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for a solid-cystic intraabdominal desmoid tumor at a gastro-pancreatic lesion: a case report.腹腔镜保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术治疗胃胰病变处的实性囊性腹腔内硬纤维瘤:病例报告
BMC Surg. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-0691-5.
6
Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术短期疗效的荟萃分析
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Feb;9(3):201-218. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0124. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Distal pancreatectomy in the new era of minimally invasive surgery: the on-going debate on the cost-effectiveness.微创手术新时代的远端胰腺切除术:关于成本效益的持续争论
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Dec;8(6):659-661. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.09.22.
8
Postoperative thrombocytosis and thromboelastographic evidence of hypercoagulability in dogs undergoing splenectomy for splenic masses.因脾脏肿物接受脾切除术的犬术后血小板增多症及血栓弹力图显示的高凝状态证据。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;256(1):85-92. doi: 10.2460/javma.256.1.85.
9
LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT SPLEEN PRESERVATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES.保留或不保留脾脏的腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:短期和长期结果的比较分析
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019 Dec 9;32(3):e1461. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1461. eCollection 2019.
10
A multicenter prospective registration study on laparoscopic pancreatectomy in Japan: report on the assessment of 1,429 patients.日本多中心前瞻性腹腔镜胰腺切除术注册研究: 1429 例评估报告。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Feb;27(2):47-55. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.695. Epub 2019 Dec 11.