• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本多中心前瞻性腹腔镜胰腺切除术注册研究: 1429 例评估报告。

A multicenter prospective registration study on laparoscopic pancreatectomy in Japan: report on the assessment of 1,429 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Feb;27(2):47-55. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.695. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.695
PMID:31665567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prospective studies are needed to understand the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. The aim of the present study was to describe laparoscopic pancreatectomy currently undertaken in Japan, using a prospective registration system.

METHODS

Patient characteristics and planned operations were registered preoperatively, and then the performed operation and outcomes were reported using an online system. Collected data were also compared between institutions based on their level of experience. This study was registered with UMIN000022836.

RESULTS

Available data were obtained from 1,429 patients at 100 Japanese institutions, including 1,197 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDPs) and 232 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies (LPDs). The rates of completion for planned operations were 92% for LDP and 91% for LPD. Postoperative complication rates after LDP and LPD were 17% and 30%, and 90-day mortality rates were 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower incidence of pancreatic fistula were observed in institutions experienced in LDP. A higher rate of pure laparoscopic procedure and shorter operation time were noted in institutions experienced with LPD.

CONCLUSION

LDPs and LPDs are performed safely in Japan, especially in experienced institutions. Our data could support the next challenges in the field of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

摘要

背景

需要前瞻性研究来了解腹腔镜胰腺切除术的安全性和可行性。本研究旨在使用前瞻性注册系统描述目前在日本进行的腹腔镜胰腺切除术。

方法

患者特征和计划手术在术前进行登记,然后使用在线系统报告实际进行的手术和结果。根据经验水平,还比较了各机构之间收集的数据。本研究在 UMIN000022836 进行了注册。

结果

从日本 100 家机构的 1429 名患者中获得了可用数据,包括 1197 例腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)和 232 例腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)。计划手术的完成率分别为 LDP 92%和 LPD 91%。LDP 和 LPD 后的术后并发症发生率分别为 17%和 30%,90 天死亡率分别为 0.3%和 0.4%。在有经验的机构中,LDP 的手术时间更短、出血量更少、胰瘘发生率更低。在有经验的机构中,LPD 的纯腹腔镜手术比例更高,手术时间更短。

结论

LDP 和 LPD 在日本安全实施,尤其是在有经验的机构中。我们的数据可以为腹腔镜胰腺切除术领域的下一步挑战提供支持。

相似文献

1
A multicenter prospective registration study on laparoscopic pancreatectomy in Japan: report on the assessment of 1,429 patients.日本多中心前瞻性腹腔镜胰腺切除术注册研究: 1429 例评估报告。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Feb;27(2):47-55. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.695. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
2
[Comparison of short-term clinical outcome between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy].腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与开放远端胰腺切除术短期临床结局的比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):495-500. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190627-00398.
3
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术和胰十二指肠切除术:值得吗?腹腔镜胰切除术的荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Apr;20(4):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0578-7.
4
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗良性或癌前胰腺肿瘤的远端胰腺切除术:一项双中心比较研究。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Jul;16(7):573-9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400257.
5
Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically?所有远端胰腺切除术都应该通过腹腔镜进行吗?
Adv Surg. 2009;43:283-300. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2009.02.013.
6
The role of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术在老年患者中的作用。
Minerva Chir. 2018 Apr;73(2):179-187. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07594-6. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.机器人辅助微创远端胰腺切除术优于腹腔镜技术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):128-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08.
8
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术和胰体尾切除术:英国经验和文献系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2084-99. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1538-4. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
9
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.腹腔镜在 70 岁以上需行胰体尾切除术患者中的应用:一项法国多中心对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3164-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6033-3. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
10
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a large single-center study.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术治疗无功能性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:一项大型单中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5702-y. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative collaboration between surgeons and endoscopists who performed previous endoscopic ultrasound in laparoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic tumor enucleation.在腹腔镜超声引导下的胰腺肿瘤摘除术中,外科医生与先前实施过内镜超声检查的内镜医师之间的术中协作。
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E236-E237. doi: 10.1055/a-2550-3975. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
The role of indocyanine green in fluorescence-guided pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive review.吲哚菁绿在荧光引导胰腺手术中的作用:一项综述
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3386-3398. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002311.
3
Effect of differences in vascular anatomy on surgical outcomes of left pancreatectomy: a retrospective study.
血管解剖差异对左半胰切除术手术结果的影响:一项回顾性研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb 4;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03700-w.
4
The safety and feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multicenter retrospective assessment of 425 patients in Japan.机器人胰十二指肠切除术的安全性和可行性:日本425例患者的多中心回顾性评估
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Feb;32(2):124-131. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12101. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
5
Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas.对于胰腺良性和低级别恶性病变,与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术相比,机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术可提高脾脏保留率。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Sep;9(9):5166-5172. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2121.
6
The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?微创(MI) fellowship 培训(FT)的肝胰和肝胆(HPB)外科医生的经验:经 MI 胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤的结果是否优于开放手术?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5256-5267. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08118-x. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
7
Current statement and safe implementation of minimally invasive surgery in the pancreas.胰腺微创手术的现状与安全实施
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Jul 9;4(5):505-513. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12366. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Surgical Outcomes Following Early Drain Removal After Distal Pancreatectomy in Elderly Patients.老年患者胰体尾切除术后早期引流管拔除的手术效果。
In Vivo. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):2837-2843. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12110.
9
Conversion to open laparotomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: lessons from a single-center experience in 70 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术中转开腹手术:单中心 70 例连续病例经验教训。
Surg Today. 2021 Jan;51(1):70-78. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02056-w. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Comparison of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Hybrid and Totally Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.杂交与完全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 26;26:e924190. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924190.