Immediate Effects of Walking With a Knee Brace After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Structural Approach.

CONTEXT

Individuals who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at higher risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Altered joint tissue loading caused by aberrant gait biomechanics leads to deleterious changes in joint health linked to the onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Knee braces have been used to modify joint tissue loading in individuals with joint injury, yet the effects of walking with a brace after ACLR on biomechanical, biochemical, and structural cartilage outcomes are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare biomechanical, biochemical, and structural outcomes between braced and nonbraced walking in individuals with ACLR.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 34 individuals with unilateral ACLR (18 females, 16 males; time since ACLR = 50.1 ± 36.8 months).

INTERVENTION(S): Gait biomechanics were assessed during braced and unbraced conditions on separate days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vertical ground reaction force, knee-flexion angle, and internal knee-extension moment waveforms were evaluated throughout the stance phase and compared between conditions. Percentage changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (%ΔCOMP) and femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (%ΔCSA) measured via ultrasound were calculated after a 3000-step walking protocol.

RESULTS

Braced walking increased the knee-flexion angle (largest difference = 3.56°; Cohen d effect size = 1.72) and knee-extension moment (largest difference = -0.48% body weight × height; Cohen d effect size = -1.14) compared with nonbraced walking but did not influence vertical ground reaction force. Whereas no difference (P = .20) in %ΔCOMP existed between the braced and nonbraced conditions in the entire cohort (n = 30 with complete blood data), a larger increase (P = .04) in %ΔCOMP was seen during nonbraced than braced walking in individuals who demonstrated increased COMP during nonbraced walking. No difference (P = .86) in %ΔCSA was present between the braced and nonbraced conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Braced walking may improve sagittal-plane gait biomechanics and %ΔCOMP in a subset of individuals who demonstrate a typical increased COMP response to load (ie, increase in COMP) after nonbraced walking.