• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

景观特征影响缅甸人类与荒野交界处亚洲象的活动范围行为。

Landscape characteristics influence ranging behavior of Asian elephants at the human-wildlands interface in Myanmar.

作者信息

Chan A N, Wittemyer G, McEvoy J, Williams A C, Cox N, Soe P, Grindley M, Shwe N M, Chit A M, Oo Z M, Leimgruber P

机构信息

Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA.

Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.

出版信息

Mov Ecol. 2022 Feb 5;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40462-022-00304-x.

DOI:10.1186/s40462-022-00304-x
PMID:35123584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8818246/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Asian elephant numbers are declining across much of their range driven largely by serious threats from land use change resulting in habitat loss and fragmentation. Myanmar, holding critical range for the species, is undergoing major developments due to recent sociopolitical changes. To effectively manage and conserve the remaining populations of endangered elephants in the country, it is crucial to understand their ranging behavior.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to (1) estimate the sizes of dry, wet, and annual ranges of wild elephants in Myanmar; and quantify the relationship between dry season (the period when human-elephant interactions are the most likely to occur) range size and configurations of agriculture and natural vegetation within the range, and (2) evaluate how percentage of agriculture within dry core range (50% AKDE range) of elephants relates to their daily distance traveled.

METHODS

We used autocorrelated kernel density estimator (AKDE) based on a continuous-time movement modeling (ctmm) framework to estimate dry season (26 ranges from 22 different individuals), wet season (12 ranges from 10 different individuals), and annual range sizes (8 individuals), and reported the 95%, 50% AKDE, and 95% Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) range sizes. We assessed how landscape characteristics influenced range size based on a broad array of 48 landscape metrics characterizing aspects of vegetation, water, and human features and their juxtaposition in the study areas. To identify the most relevant landscape metrics and simplify our candidate set of informative metrics, we relied on exploratory factor analysis and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Based on this analysis we adopted a final set of metrics into our regression analysis. In a multiple regression framework, we developed candidate models to explain the variation in AKDE dry season range sizes based on the previously identified, salient metrics of landscape composition.

RESULTS

Elephant dry season ranges were highly variable averaging 792.0 km and 184.2 km for the 95% and 50% AKDE home ranges, respectively. We found both the shape and spatial configuration of agriculture and natural vegetation patches within an individual elephant's range play a significant role in determining the size of its range. We also found that elephants are moving more (larger energy expenditure) in ranges with higher percentages of agricultural area.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide baseline information on elephant spatial requirements and the factors affecting them in Myanmar. This information is important for advancing future land use planning that takes into account space-use requirements for elephants. Failing to do so may further endanger already declining elephant populations in Myanmar and across the species' range.

摘要

背景

亚洲象数量在其大部分分布范围内都在下降,主要原因是土地利用变化带来的严重威胁,导致栖息地丧失和破碎化。缅甸拥有该物种的关键分布区域,由于近期的社会政治变革,该国正在经历重大发展。为了有效管理和保护该国濒危大象的剩余种群,了解它们的活动范围行为至关重要。

目标

我们的目标是:(1)估计缅甸野生大象的旱季、雨季和年活动范围大小;量化旱季(人与象互动最可能发生的时期)活动范围大小与该范围内农业和自然植被配置之间的关系;(2)评估大象旱季核心范围(50% AKDE范围)内农业所占百分比与它们每日移动距离之间的关系。

方法

我们使用基于连续时间运动建模(ctmm)框架的自相关核密度估计器(AKDE)来估计旱季(来自22个不同个体的26个活动范围)、雨季(来自10个不同个体的12个活动范围)和年活动范围大小(8个个体),并报告95%、50% AKDE以及95%最小凸多边形(MCP)活动范围大小。我们基于一系列48个景观指标评估了景观特征如何影响活动范围大小,这些指标表征了植被、水和人类特征以及它们在研究区域中的并置情况。为了确定最相关的景观指标并简化我们的信息指标候选集,我们依赖探索性因子分析和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数。基于此分析,我们在回归分析中采用了一组最终指标。在多元回归框架下,我们开发了候选模型,以根据先前确定的、突出的景观组成指标来解释AKDE旱季活动范围大小的变化。

结果

大象旱季活动范围变化很大,95%和50% AKDE家域范围平均分别为792.0千米和184.2千米。我们发现,在个体大象活动范围内,农业和自然植被斑块的形状和空间配置在决定其活动范围大小方面都起着重要作用。我们还发现,在农业面积百分比更高的活动范围内,大象移动得更多(能量消耗更大)。

结论

我们的结果提供了缅甸大象空间需求及其影响因素的基线信息。这些信息对于推进未来考虑大象空间利用需求的土地利用规划很重要。不这样做可能会进一步危及缅甸及该物种分布范围内已经在减少的大象种群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/cbe2a8c0bd1f/40462_2022_304_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/93f19a34b875/40462_2022_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/57c7f8a3b580/40462_2022_304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/7ef9d71587e8/40462_2022_304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/c5348abd81c4/40462_2022_304_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/cbe2a8c0bd1f/40462_2022_304_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/93f19a34b875/40462_2022_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/57c7f8a3b580/40462_2022_304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/7ef9d71587e8/40462_2022_304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/c5348abd81c4/40462_2022_304_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/374b/8818246/cbe2a8c0bd1f/40462_2022_304_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Landscape characteristics influence ranging behavior of Asian elephants at the human-wildlands interface in Myanmar.景观特征影响缅甸人类与荒野交界处亚洲象的活动范围行为。
Mov Ecol. 2022 Feb 5;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40462-022-00304-x.
2
Seasonal variation in the ranging behavior of elephants in the Laikipia-Samburu ecosystem.莱基皮亚-桑布鲁生态系统中大象活动范围行为的季节性变化。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug 27;14(8):e70198. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70198. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Forest elephant movement and habitat use in a tropical forest-grassland mosaic in Gabon.加蓬热带森林-草原镶嵌区森林象的活动和栖息地利用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0199387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199387. eCollection 2018.
4
How do African elephants utilize the landscape during wet season? A habitat connectivity analysis for Sioma Ngwezi landscape in Zambia.非洲象在雨季如何利用这片土地?赞比亚索马恩格韦齐地区栖息地连通性分析。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 7;11(21):14916-14931. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8177. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Assessment of historical forest cover loss and fragmentation in Asian elephant ranges in India.评估印度亚洲象栖息地历史上的森林覆盖损失和破碎化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 27;191(Suppl 3):802. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7696-5.
6
Assessment and prediction of spatial patterns of human-elephant conflicts in changing land cover scenarios of a human-dominated landscape in North Bengal.评估和预测北孟加拉以人类为主导的景观中不断变化的土地覆盖情景下,人象冲突的空间模式。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 1;14(2):e0210580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210580. eCollection 2019.
7
Risk perception and tolerance shape variation in agricultural use for a transboundary elephant population.风险认知和容忍度塑造了跨境大象种群在农业利用上的变化。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Jan;91(1):112-123. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13605. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Determinants of elephant foraging behaviour in a coupled human-natural system: Is brown the new green?在耦合的人类-自然系统中大象觅食行为的决定因素:棕色是新的绿色吗?
J Anim Ecol. 2019 May;88(5):780-792. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12971. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
9
Home range and ranging behaviour of Bornean elephant (Elephas maximus borneensis) females.婆罗洲象(Elephas maximus borneensis)雌性的家域和活动范围行为。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031400. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
10
Exploring movement decisions: Can Bayesian movement-state models explain crop consumption behaviour in elephants (Loxodonta africana)?探索运动决策:贝叶斯运动状态模型能否解释大象(非洲象)对作物的消耗行为?
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Apr;89(4):1055-1068. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13177. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
On the elephant trails: habitat suitability and connectivity for Asian elephants in eastern Indian landscape.在大象的足迹上:印度东部景观中亚洲象的栖息地适宜性和连通性。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 29;12:e16746. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16746. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond protected areas: The importance of mixed-use landscapes for the conservation of Sumatran elephants ().保护区之外:混合用途景观对苏门答腊象保护的重要性()
Ecol Evol. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):e10560. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10560. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Current and Future Approaches to Mitigate Conflict between Humans and Asian Elephants: The Potential Use of Aversive Geofencing Devices.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioural valuation of landscapes using movement data.使用运动数据进行景观行为评估。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 16;374(1781):20180046. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0046. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
2
Movement reveals reproductive tactics in male elephants.雄性大象的运动揭示了其繁殖策略。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jan;89(1):57-67. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13035. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
3
Ecological metrics and methods for GPS movement data.全球定位系统移动数据的生态指标与方法
减轻人类与亚洲象冲突的当前及未来方法:厌恶式地理围栏设备的潜在用途
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;12(21):2965. doi: 10.3390/ani12212965.
4
Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations.亚洲象在与动机状态和社会关系相关的保护区使用策略。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22989-1.
5
Supporting Zoo Asian Elephant () Welfare and Herd Dynamics with a More Complex and Expanded Habitat.通过更复杂和扩展的栖息地支持动物园亚洲象()的福利和种群动态。 (注:括号内内容原文缺失,翻译时保留原样)
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;11(9):2566. doi: 10.3390/ani11092566.
Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2018;32(11):2272-2293. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1498097. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education.美国哺乳动物学会2016年关于在研究和教育中使用野生哺乳动物的指南。
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. Epub 2016 May 28.
5
New elephant crisis in Asia-Early warning signs from Myanmar.亚洲新的大象危机——来自缅甸的预警信号。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194113. eCollection 2018.
6
Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements.人类世中的迁徙:全球陆地哺乳动物迁徙减少。
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):466-469. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9712.
7
Political transition and emergent forest-conservation issues in Myanmar.缅甸的政治转型与新出现的森林保护问题
Conserv Biol. 2017 Dec;31(6):1257-1270. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13021. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
8
Rapid forest clearing in a Myanmar proposed national park threatens two newly discovered species of geckos (Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus).缅甸一个拟建国家公园内的森林被迅速砍伐,这威胁到了两种新发现的壁虎(壁虎科:弯脚虎属)。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 12;12(4):e0174432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174432. eCollection 2017.
9
Space Use and Movement of a Neotropical Top Predator: The Endangered Jaguar.新热带顶级食肉动物的空间利用与活动:濒危的美洲豹
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168176. eCollection 2016.
10
ECOLOGY. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet.生态学。陆地动物追踪——生命与星球之“眼”。
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):aaa2478. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2478.