Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;7(4):342-352. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00005-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
The effects that therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are not yet fully known. Therefore, we sought to determine whether COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses were altered in patients with IBD on commonly used immunosuppressive drugs.
In this multicentre, prospective, case-control study (VIP), we recruited adults with IBD treated with one of six different immunosuppressive treatment regimens (thiopurines, infliximab, a thiopurine plus infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib) and healthy control participants from nine centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines (either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech], or mRNA1273 [Moderna]) 6-12 weeks apart (according to scheduling adopted in the UK). We measured antibody responses 53-92 days after a second vaccine dose using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted by age and vaccine type, and was analysed by use of multivariable linear regression models. This study is registered in the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN13495664, and is ongoing.
Between May 31 and Nov 24, 2021, we recruited 483 participants, including patients with IBD being treated with thiopurines (n=78), infliximab (n=63), a thiopurine plus infliximab (n=72), ustekinumab (n=57), vedolizumab (n=62), or tofacitinib (n=30), and 121 healthy controls. We included 370 participants without evidence of previous infection in our primary analysis. Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (156·8 U/mL [geometric SD 5·7]; p<0·0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (111·1 U/mL [5·7]; p<0·0001), or tofacitinib (429·5 U/mL [3·1]; p=0·0012) compared with controls (1578·3 U/mL [3·7]). There were no significant differences in antibody concentrations between patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy (1019·8 U/mL [4·3]; p=0·74), ustekinumab (582·4 U/mL [4·6]; p=0·11), or vedolizumab (954·0 U/mL [4·1]; p=0·50) and healthy controls. In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0·12, 95% CI 0·08-0·17; p<0·0001) and tofacitinib (0·43, 0·23-0·81; p=0·0095), but not with ustekinumab (0·69, 0·41-1·19; p=0·18), thiopurines (0·89, 0·64-1·24; p=0·50), or vedolizumab (1·16, 0·74-1·83; p=0·51). mRNA vaccines (3·68, 2·80-4·84; p<0·0001; vs adenovirus vector vaccines) were independently associated with higher antibody concentrations and older age per decade (0·79, 0·72-0·87; p<0·0001) with lower antibody concentrations.
For patients with IBD, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines varies according to immunosuppressive drug exposure, and is attenuated in recipients of infliximab, infliximab plus thiopurines, and tofacitinib. Scheduling of third primary, or booster, doses could be personalised on the basis of an individual's treatment, and patients taking anti-tumour necrosis factor and tofacitinib should be prioritised.
Pfizer.
治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的疗法对 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗免疫反应的影响尚不完全清楚。因此,我们试图确定在使用六种不同免疫抑制药物治疗的 IBD 患者中,COVID-19 疫苗诱导的抗体反应是否发生了改变。
在这项多中心、前瞻性、病例对照研究(VIP)中,我们从英国的九个中心招募了接受六种不同免疫抑制治疗方案(硫唑嘌呤、英夫利昔单抗、硫唑嘌呤加英夫利昔单抗、乌司奴单抗、vedolizumab 或托法替尼)治疗的 IBD 成年患者和健康对照参与者。符合条件的参与者年龄在 18 岁或以上,并且在 6-12 周(根据英国采用的时间表)内接种了两剂 COVID-19 疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19[牛津-阿斯利康]、BNT162b2[辉瑞-生物科技]或 mRNA1273[莫德纳])。我们使用 Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 刺突电化学发光免疫分析试剂盒在第二次疫苗接种后 53-92 天测量抗体反应。主要结局是无 SARS-CoV-2 既往感染的参与者的抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白抗体浓度,通过年龄和疫苗类型进行调整,并使用多变量线性回归模型进行分析。这项研究在 ISRCTN 注册表中注册,ISRCTN13495664,正在进行中。
在 2021 年 5 月 31 日至 11 月 24 日期间,我们招募了 483 名参与者,包括接受硫唑嘌呤(n=78)、英夫利昔单抗(n=63)、硫唑嘌呤加英夫利昔单抗(n=72)、乌司奴单抗(n=57)、vedolizumab(n=62)或托法替尼(n=30)治疗的 IBD 患者和 121 名健康对照者。我们在主要分析中纳入了 370 名无既往感染证据的参与者。抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白抗体浓度的几何均数在接受英夫利昔单抗(156.8 U/mL[几何标准差 5.7];p<0.0001)、英夫利昔单抗加硫唑嘌呤(111.1 U/mL[5.7];p<0.0001)或托法替尼(429.5 U/mL[3.1];p=0.0012)治疗的患者中明显低于对照组(1578.3 U/mL[3.7])。接受硫唑嘌呤单药治疗(1019.8 U/mL[4.3];p=0.74)、乌司奴单抗(582.4 U/mL[4.6];p=0.11)或 vedolizumab(954.0 U/mL[4.1];p=0.50)的患者与健康对照组的抗体浓度无显著差异。在多变量模型中,抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白抗体浓度较低与英夫利昔单抗(几何均数比值 0.12,95%置信区间 0.08-0.17;p<0.0001)和托法替尼(0.43,0.23-0.81;p=0.0095)独立相关,但与乌司奴单抗(0.69,0.41-1.19;p=0.18)、硫唑嘌呤(0.89,0.64-1.24;p=0.50)或 vedolizumab(1.16,0.74-1.83;p=0.51)无关。mRNA 疫苗(3.68,2.80-4.84;p<0.0001;与腺病毒载体疫苗相比)与抗体浓度较高和每十年年龄增加 0.79(0.72-0.87;p<0.0001)独立相关,而抗体浓度较低。
对于 IBD 患者,COVID-19 疫苗的免疫原性根据免疫抑制药物的暴露情况而有所不同,并且接受英夫利昔单抗、英夫利昔单抗加硫唑嘌呤和托法替尼治疗的患者的免疫原性降低。第三剂或加强剂的接种时间可以根据个体的治疗方案进行个性化安排,并且应该优先考虑接受抗 TNF 治疗和托法替尼治疗的患者。
辉瑞。