• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不完全条件关联检验用于模型假设评估。

Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions.

机构信息

Department Erziehungs- und Sozialwissenschaften, University of Cologne, Germany, Gronewaldstr. 2a, 50931, Cologne, Deutschland.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1214-1237. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09841-1. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09841-1
PMID:35124767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9636116/
Abstract

Many of the models that have been proposed for response data share the assumptions that define the monotone homogeneity (MH) model. Observable properties that are implied by the MH model allow for these assumptions to be tested. For binary response data, the most restrictive of these properties is called conditional association (CA). All the other properties considered can be considered incomplete tests of CA that alleviate the practical limitations encountered when assessing the MH model assumptions using CA. It is found that the assessment of the MH model assumptions with an incomplete test of CA, rather than CA, is generally associated with a substantial loss of information. We also look at the sensitivity of the observable properties to model violation and discuss the implications of the results. It is argued that more research is required about the extent to which the assumptions and the model specifications influence the inferences made from response data.

摘要

许多用于响应数据的模型都共享定义单调同质性 (MH) 模型的假设。MH 模型所隐含的可观察属性允许对这些假设进行检验。对于二项响应数据,这些属性中最严格的称为条件关联 (CA)。其他所有被认为是 CA 的不完全检验的属性都可以缓解在使用 CA 评估 MH 模型假设时遇到的实际限制。结果发现,使用 CA 的不完全检验而不是 CA 来评估 MH 模型假设通常会导致大量信息丢失。我们还研究了可观察属性对模型违反的敏感性,并讨论了结果的含义。有人认为,需要进一步研究假设和模型规格在多大程度上影响从响应数据中得出的推论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/8ae7926776cd/11336_2022_9841_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/728b0f0eb6c6/11336_2022_9841_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/195dfd752abe/11336_2022_9841_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/df949b6fd3da/11336_2022_9841_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/a764c1b0e744/11336_2022_9841_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/775a371b70f4/11336_2022_9841_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/88da2ab122d2/11336_2022_9841_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/0383a37953f0/11336_2022_9841_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/6809b429f292/11336_2022_9841_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/5f88405eb387/11336_2022_9841_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/8ae7926776cd/11336_2022_9841_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/728b0f0eb6c6/11336_2022_9841_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/195dfd752abe/11336_2022_9841_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/df949b6fd3da/11336_2022_9841_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/a764c1b0e744/11336_2022_9841_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/775a371b70f4/11336_2022_9841_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/88da2ab122d2/11336_2022_9841_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/0383a37953f0/11336_2022_9841_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/6809b429f292/11336_2022_9841_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/5f88405eb387/11336_2022_9841_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc86/9636116/8ae7926776cd/11336_2022_9841_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions.不完全条件关联检验用于模型假设评估。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1214-1237. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09841-1. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2
A Test to Distinguish Monotone Homogeneity from Monotone Multifactor Models.一种区分单调同质性与单调多因子模型的检验方法。
Psychometrika. 2023 Jun;88(2):387-412. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09905-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
3
An inequality for correlations in unidimensional monotone latent variable models for binary variables.二元变量单维单调潜在变量模型中相关性的一个不等式。
Psychometrika. 2014 Apr;79(2):303-16. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9341-5. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
4
Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the stroke upper limb capacity scale, SULCS.测量中风后患者的上肢能力:单调同质性模型的开发、拟合、单维度性、双单调性模型的拟合、项目功能差异、内部一致性以及中风上肢能力量表(SULCS)的可行性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):214-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.034.
5
An Exact Method for Partitioning Dichotomous Items Within the Framework of the Monotone Homogeneity Model.在单调同质性模型框架内对二分项目进行划分的精确方法。
Psychometrika. 2015 Dec;80(4):949-67. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9459-8. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Testing manifest monotonicity using order-constrained statistical inference.使用序约束统计推断检验明显单调性。
Psychometrika. 2013 Jan;78(1):83-97. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9297-x. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
7
Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach.采用莫克尺度分析研究教育环境量表(DREEM)的心理计量学特性和维度结构 - 一种实用方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1334-8.
8
Monotone Confounding, Monotone Treatment Selection and Monotone Treatment Response.单调混杂、单调治疗选择与单调治疗反应
J Causal Inference. 2014 Mar;2(1):1-12. doi: 10.1515/jci-2012-0006.
9
[Mokken scaling of the Cognitive Screening Test].[认知筛查测试的 Mokken 量表分析]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 Oct;40(5):193-202. doi: 10.1007/BF03079588.
10
A note on monotonicity of item response functions for ordered polytomous item response theory models.关于有序多分类项目反应理论模型中项目反应函数单调性的一则注释。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 Nov;71(3):523-535. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12131. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Recognize the Value of the Sum Score, Psychometrics' Greatest Accomplishment.认识总和评分的价值,心理计量学最大的成就。
Psychometrika. 2024 Mar;89(1):84-117. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09964-7. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
2
In models we trust: preregistration, large samples, and replication may not suffice.我们相信模型:预注册、大样本和复制可能并不够。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 21;14:1266447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266447. eCollection 2023.
3
A Test to Distinguish Monotone Homogeneity from Monotone Multifactor Models.一种区分单调同质性与单调多因子模型的检验方法。

本文引用的文献

1
An Evaluation of Overall Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Rasch Model.拉施模型整体拟合优度检验的评估
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 10;9:2710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02710. eCollection 2018.
2
Investigating the Practical Consequences of Model Misfit in Unidimensional IRT Models.探究单维IRT模型中模型失配的实际后果。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Sep;41(6):439-455. doi: 10.1177/0146621617695522. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
3
On the Complexity of Item Response Theory Models.项目反应理论模型的复杂性
Psychometrika. 2023 Jun;88(2):387-412. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09905-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Jul-Aug;52(4):465-484. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1309262. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
4
A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.关于如何对你的测试和问卷数据进行莫肯量表分析的教程。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Feb;70(1):137-158. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12078. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
An Isotonic Partial Credit Model for Ordering Subjects on the Basis of Their Sum Scores.基于总分对被试进行排序的一种等距分项计分模型。
Psychometrika. 2012 Jul;77(3):479-94. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9272-6. Epub 2012 May 17.
6
Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparison of Three Approaches.有序变量的因子分析:三种方法的比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Jul 1;36(3):347-87. doi: 10.1207/S15327906347-387.
7
Quantifying Parsimony in Structural Equation Modeling.结构方程模型中的简约性量化
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Sep 1;41(3):227-59. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_1.
8
Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors.使用贝叶斯因子评估明显单调性。
Psychometrika. 2015 Dec;80(4):880-96. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9475-8. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
9
An Exact Method for Partitioning Dichotomous Items Within the Framework of the Monotone Homogeneity Model.在单调同质性模型框架内对二分项目进行划分的精确方法。
Psychometrika. 2015 Dec;80(4):949-67. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9459-8. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Testing manifest monotonicity using order-constrained statistical inference.使用序约束统计推断检验明显单调性。
Psychometrika. 2013 Jan;78(1):83-97. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9297-x. Epub 2012 Dec 6.