Suppr超能文献

2012-2018 年,医疗保险和医疗补助双重参保者在保健中心的使用情况和基于医院的护理。

Health center use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 2012-2018.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1045-1057. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13946. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between federally qualified health center (FQHC) use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from 2012 to 2018 Medicare claims.

STUDY DESIGN

We modeled hospital-based care as a function of FQHC use, person-level factors, a Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) indicator, and ZIP code fixed effects. Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits (overall and nonemergent), observation stays, hospitalizations (overall and for ambulatory care sensitive conditions), and 30-day unplanned returns. We stratified all models on the basis of eligibility and rurality.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Our sample included individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid for at least two full consecutive years, residing in a primary care service area with an FQHC. We excluded individuals without primary care visits, who died, or had end-stage renal disease.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

After the Medicare PPS was introduced, FQHC use in rural counties was associated with fewer ED and nonemergent ED visits per 100 person-years among both age-eligible (-14.8 [-17.5, -12.1]; -6.6 [-7.5, -5.6]) and disability-eligible duals (-11.3 [-14.4, -8.3]; -6 [-7.4, -4.6]) as well as a lower probability of observation stays (-0.8 pp age-eligible; -0.4 pp disability-eligible) and unplanned returns (-2.1 pp age-eligible; -1.9 pp disability-eligible). In urban counties, FQHC use was associated with more ED and nonemergent ED visits per 100 person-years (10.6 [8.4, 12.8]; 4.0 [2.6, 5.4]) among disability-eligible duals (a decrease of more than 60% compared with the pre-PPS period) and increases in the probability of hospitalization (1.1 pp age-eligible; 0.8 pp disability-eligible) and ACS hospitalization (0.5 pp age-eligible; 0.3 pp disability-eligible) (a decrease of roughly 50% compared with the pre-PPS period).

CONCLUSIONS

FQHC use is associated with reductions in hospital-based care among dual enrollees after introduction of the Medicare PPS. Further research is needed to understand how FQHCs can tailor care to best serve this complex population.

摘要

目的

研究在同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助的人群中,联邦合格医疗中心 (FQHC) 的使用与医院为基础的护理之间的关系。

数据来源

数据来自 2012 年至 2018 年的医疗保险索赔。

研究设计

我们将医院为基础的护理建模为 FQHC 使用、个人因素、医疗保险前瞻性支付系统 (PPS) 指标和邮政编码固定效应的函数。结果包括急诊部 (ED) 就诊(总体和非紧急)、观察停留、住院(总体和用于门诊护理敏感情况)和 30 天无计划返回。我们根据资格和农村状况对所有模型进行分层。

数据提取方法

我们的样本包括至少连续两年同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助的个人,居住在有 FQHC 的初级保健服务区域。我们排除了没有初级保健就诊、死亡或患有终末期肾病的个人。

主要发现

在 Medicare PPS 推出后,农村县的 FQHC 使用与每 100 人年中年龄合格者的 ED 和非紧急 ED 就诊次数减少有关(-14.8 [-17.5,-12.1];-6.6 [-7.5,-5.6])和残疾合格者(-11.3 [-14.4,-8.3];-6 [-7.4,-4.6])以及观察停留的可能性降低(-0.8 个百分点,年龄合格;-0.4 个百分点,残疾合格)和无计划返回(-2.1 个百分点,年龄合格;-1.9 个百分点,残疾合格)。在城市县,FQHC 使用与残疾合格者每 100 人年的 ED 和非紧急 ED 就诊次数增加有关(10.6 [8.4,12.8];4.0 [2.6,5.4]),与 PPS 前时期相比,这一比例增加了 60%以上)以及住院(1.1 个百分点,年龄合格;0.8 个百分点,残疾合格)和 ACS 住院(0.5 个百分点,年龄合格;0.3 个百分点,残疾合格)的可能性增加(与 PPS 前时期相比,减少了约 50%)。

结论

在 Medicare PPS 推出后,FQHC 的使用与双重参保者的医院为基础的护理减少有关。需要进一步研究如何使 FQHC 能够定制护理以最好地为这一复杂人群服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c63e/9441286/13bbcc3daa3d/HESR-57-1045-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验