• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助扩张计划与联邦合格健康中心高血压和糖尿病治疗结果 5 年变化的相关性研究。

Association of Medicaid Expansion With 5-Year Changes in Hypertension and Diabetes Outcomes at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Sep 10;2(9):e212375. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2375. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2375
PMID:35977186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796924/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

State decisions to expand Medicaid eligibility were particularly consequential for federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which serve 30 million low-income patients across the US. The longer-term association of Medicaid expansion with health outcomes at FQHCs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 5-year association of Medicaid expansion with uninsurance rates and hypertension and diabetes outcome measures by race and ethnicity in a nationally representative population of FQHCs.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Using a difference-in-differences analysis of a retrospective cohort from the universe of US FQHCs, changes in uninsurance rates and intermediate health outcomes for hypertension and diabetes by race and ethnicity were compared between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states before (2012-2013) vs after (2014-2018) expansion. Data were analyzed from September 2020 to March 2021.

EXPOSURES

Location in a state that expanded Medicaid eligibility as of 2014.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rates of uninsurance, the proportion of patients with hypertension with a blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg, and the proportion of patients with diabetes with glycosylated hemoglobin levels of 9% or less, as stratified by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of the patients at 578 expansion-state FQHCs (serving 13.0 million patients per year) and 368 nonexpansion-state FQHCs (serving 6.0 million patients per year) in our study sample, 64.4% were age 18 to 64 years, 57.4% were women, 18.9% were non-Hispanic Black, and 27.3% were Hispanic. Following expansion, FQHCs in Medicaid expansion states experienced a 9.24 percentage point (PP) (95% CI, 7.94-10.54) decline in rates of uninsurance over the pooled 5-year expansion period compared with nonexpansion-state FQHCs. Across this 5-year period, expansion was associated with a 1.61-PP (95% CI, 0.58-2.64) comparative improvement in hypertension control and a 1.84-PP (95% CI, 0.71-2.98) comparative improvement in glucose control. Stratified results suggest that improvements were consistently observed in Black and Hispanic populations. The magnitude of change tended to increase with implementation time. For instance, by year 5, expansion was associated with a 3.38-PP (95% CI, 0.80-5.96) comparative improvement in hypertension control and a 3.88-PP (95% CI, 0.86-6.90) comparative improvement in glucose control among Black populations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this nationally representative cohort study, Medicaid expansion was associated with sustained increases in insurance coverage and improvements in chronic disease outcome measures at FQHCs after 5 years overall and among Black and Hispanic populations. States considering Medicaid expansion may benefit from improved longer-run health measures for underserved patients with chronic conditions.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c8/8796924/6f251d6c4bff/jamahealthforum-e212375-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c8/8796924/6f251d6c4bff/jamahealthforum-e212375-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c8/8796924/6f251d6c4bff/jamahealthforum-e212375-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性:扩大医疗补助资格的州决策对符合联邦资格的医疗中心(FQHCs)尤为重要,这些中心为美国各地的 3000 万低收入患者提供服务。扩大医疗补助计划与 FQHC 健康结果之间的长期关联尚不清楚。

目的:评估 Medicaid 扩张在全国代表性的 FQHC 人群中,按种族和民族分类的保险率和高血压及糖尿病结果测量的 5 年关联。

设计、设置和参与者:利用美国 FQHC 整体的回顾性队列的差异差异分析,比较 Medicaid 扩张和非扩张州在扩张前(2012-2013 年)与扩张后(2014-2018 年)之间的保险率和高血压及糖尿病中间健康结果的变化。数据于 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 3 月进行分析。

暴露:位于 2014 年扩大医疗补助资格的州。

主要结果和措施:按种族和民族分类的保险率、高血压患者中血压低于 140/90mmHg 的比例以及糖尿病患者中糖化血红蛋白水平为 9%或更低的比例。

结果:在我们的研究样本中,578 家扩张州 FQHC(每年服务 1300 万患者)和 368 家非扩张州 FQHC(每年服务 600 万患者)的 578 家患者中,64.4%的患者年龄在 18 至 64 岁之间,57.4%为女性,18.9%为非西班牙裔黑人,27.3%为西班牙裔。在扩张后,与非扩张州的 FQHC 相比,扩张州的 FQHC 在整个 5 年扩张期间的保险率下降了 9.24 个百分点(95%CI,7.94-10.54)。在这 5 年期间,扩张与高血压控制的 1.61 个百分点(95%CI,0.58-2.64)的比较改善以及葡萄糖控制的 1.84 个百分点(95%CI,0.71-2.98)的比较改善相关。分层结果表明,在黑人和西班牙裔人群中始终观察到改善。变化的幅度往往随着实施时间的增加而增加。例如,到第 5 年,扩张与黑人人群中高血压控制的 3.38 个百分点(95%CI,0.80-5.96)的比较改善以及葡萄糖控制的 3.88 个百分点(95%CI,0.86-6.90)的比较改善相关。

结论和相关性:在这项全国代表性队列研究中, Medicaid 扩张与 FQHC 整体保险覆盖范围的持续增加以及黑人及西班牙裔人群中慢性病结果测量的改善相关,持续 5 年。考虑 Medicaid 扩张的州可能会从改善服务不足的慢性病患者的长期健康指标中受益。

相似文献

1
Association of Medicaid Expansion With 5-Year Changes in Hypertension and Diabetes Outcomes at Federally Qualified Health Centers.医疗补助扩张计划与联邦合格健康中心高血压和糖尿病治疗结果 5 年变化的相关性研究。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Sep 10;2(9):e212375. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2375. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Alternative Payment Models and Performance in Federally Qualified Health Centers.医保定点医疗机构的支付方式改革与绩效
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Sep 1;184(9):1065-1073. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.2754.
3
Association of State Medicaid Expansion With Quality of Care and Outcomes for Low-Income Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction.州医疗补助计划扩大覆盖范围与低收住院急性心肌梗死患者的医疗质量和结局的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;4(2):120-127. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4577.
4
Association of State Medicaid Expansion With Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Liver Transplant Wait-listing in the United States.美国医疗补助扩张计划与肝移植候补名单上的种族/民族差异的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019869. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19869.
5
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Health Insurance Coverage Among Persons With a Disability.医疗补助扩张与残疾人士健康保险覆盖之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197136. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7136.
6
Dental Outcomes After Medicaid Insurance Coverage Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后医疗补助保险覆盖范围扩大对牙科治疗效果的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124144. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24144.
7
COVID-19-Related Insurance Coverage Changes and Disparities in Access to Care Among Low-Income US Adults in 4 Southern States.COVID-19 相关保险覆盖范围变化与美国南部 4 个州低收入成年人获得医疗服务的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 13;2(8):e212007. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2007. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Rates of Diabetes-Related Major Amputations Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Adults Following Medicaid Expansion Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施医疗补助扩张计划后,少数族裔成年人糖尿病相关主要截肢率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223991. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3991.
9
Health Care Access and Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Working-Age Adults With Low Income by State Medicaid Expansion Status.各州医疗补助扩张状况下,低收入劳动年龄段成年人的医疗保健可及性和心血管危险因素管理
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jul 1;7(7):708-714. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1282.
10
Examination of Elective Bariatric Surgery Rates Before and After US Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion.美国平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助计划前后择期减肥手术率的检查。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 8;2(10):e213083. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3083. eCollection 2021 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Disparities in Hypertension-Related Hospital Mortality Among Adults in the United States.美国成年人高血压相关医院死亡率的种族差异
Cureus. 2025 Mar 23;17(3):e81043. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81043. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Variation in Hypertension Control by Race and Ethnicity, and Geography in US Veterans.美国退伍军人中高血压控制情况在种族、民族及地域方面的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 21;14(2):e035682. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.035682. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
3
Clinician Staffing and Quality of Care in US Health Centers.美国健康中心的临床人员配备与医疗质量。

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of Undiagnosed Hypertension and Diagnosed Hypertension Without Anti-hypertensive Medication Following the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后未诊断高血压和未接受抗高血压药物治疗的高血压发病率。
Am J Hypertens. 2021 Sep 22;34(9):989-998. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab069.
2
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Rates of Utilization of Cardiovascular Therapies Among Medicaid Beneficiaries Between 2011 and 2018.2011 年至 2018 年间,医疗补助扩张与医疗补助受益人心血管治疗利用率之间的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e007492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007492. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40140.
4
Quality Measurement in Shanghai From a Global Perspective; A Response to Recent Commentaries.从全球视角看上海的质量测量;对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8491. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8491. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
5
The Cumulative Effect of Expanding the Breadth and Scope of Coverage for Substance Use Disorder Treatment on Behavioral Health Acute Inpatient Admissions: Evidence from Virginia Medicaid.物质使用障碍治疗的广度和范围不断扩大对行为健康急性住院人数的累积影响:弗吉尼亚州医疗补助计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;21(6):777. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060777.
6
Latino-White Disparities in Identification and Control of Elevated Blood Pressure Among Adults With Hypertension.拉丁裔-白人在高血压患者血压升高的识别和控制方面的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e033151. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033151. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
7
Association of Economic Policies With Hypertension Management and Control: A Systematic Review.经济政策与高血压管理和控制的关联:系统评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235231. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5231.
8
Diabetes and Hypertension Prevention and Control in Community Health Centers: Impact of the Affordable Care Act.社区卫生中心的糖尿病和高血压预防与控制:平价医疗法案的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231195697. doi: 10.1177/21501319231195697.
9
Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion was Associated With Reductions in the Proportion of Hospitalizations That are Potentially Preventable Among Hispanic and White Adults.平价医疗法案下的医疗补助扩大计划与西班牙裔和白人成年人中潜在可预防住院治疗比例的降低有关。
Med Care. 2023 Oct 1;61(10):627-635. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001902. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
10
Evaluating the accessibility and value of U.S. ambulatory care among Medicaid expansion states and non-expansion states, 2012-2015.评估 2012-2015 年美国在扩大医疗补助计划的州和非扩大医疗补助计划的州的门诊护理的可及性和价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 3;23(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09696-x.
医疗补助扩大计划与乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024366. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24366.
4
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
5
Unmet social needs among low-income adults in the United States: Associations with health care access and quality.美国低收入成年人未满足的社会需求:与医疗保健可及性和质量的关联。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):873-882. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13555. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
The Affordable Care Act: Effects of Insurance on Diabetes Biomarkers.平价医疗法案:保险对糖尿病生物标志物的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2074-2081. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1571. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
The Affordable Care Act improved health insurance coverage and cardiovascular-related screening rates for cancer survivors seen in community health centers.《平价医疗法案》提高了社区健康中心癌症幸存者的医疗保险覆盖率和心血管相关筛查率。
Cancer. 2020 Jul 15;126(14):3303-3311. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32900. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Medicaid Expansion Slowed Rates Of Health Decline For Low-Income Adults In Southern States.医疗补助扩大计划减缓了南方贫困州低收入成年人健康状况恶化的速度。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):67-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00929.
9
The Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion Positively Impacted Community Health Centers and Their Patients.平价医疗法案中的医疗补助扩大计划对社区卫生中心及其患者产生了积极影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1292-1295. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05571-w. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Prevalence of Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2011-2016.美国 2011-2016 年按种族和民族划分的糖尿病患病率。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2389-2398. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.19365.