Bull Hist Med. 2021;95(4):464-496. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2021.0054.
This article proposes a new line of enquiry in the history of animal conservation by suggesting that African wildlife protection was a form of public health in the early twentieth century. Through examining the activities of South African epidemiologists, politicians, bureaucrats, farmers, and zoologists in the 1920s and 1930s, the author argues that wildlife was integrated into epidemiological strategies and agricultural modes of production. Against the backdrop of a series of plague outbreaks, carnivora once deemed "vermin" were legally protected as sources of human health and agricultural wealth. As public health, food security, and carnivore populations were imbricated, the categorical boundaries between human and animal health also began to blur. Ultimately, this case suggests the need to bridge environmental and medical history and to broaden the history of environment and health beyond canonical figures such as Rachel Carson. Paying attention to colonial "peripheries" and African thought is critical in understanding the origins of twentieth-century environmentalism.
本文通过探讨 20 世纪 20 年代和 30 年代南非流行病学家、政治家、官僚、农民和动物学家的活动,提出了动物保护史的一个新的研究方向,认为野生动物保护在 20 世纪早期是一种公共卫生形式。作者认为,野生动物被纳入了流行病学策略和农业生产模式。在一系列瘟疫爆发的背景下,曾经被视为“害虫”的食肉动物被依法保护,成为人类健康和农业财富的来源。随着公共卫生、食品安全和食肉动物数量的交织,人类和动物健康之间的类别界限也开始变得模糊。最终,这个案例表明,有必要弥合环境史和医学史之间的鸿沟,并将环境与健康史的研究范围扩大到雷切尔·卡森等经典人物之外。关注殖民“边缘”和非洲思想对于理解 20 世纪环境保护主义的起源至关重要。