Suppr超能文献

大流行中的公共理性:约翰·罗尔斯论新冠疫情时代的真理

Public Reason in a Pandemic: John Rawls on Truth in the Age of COVID-19.

作者信息

Warner Calvin H

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 USA.

出版信息

Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2022;50(3):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11406-021-00459-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Abstract

In "Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical," John Rawls suggests an approach to a public conception of justice that eschews any dependence on metaphysical conceptions of justice in favor of a political conception of justice. This means that if there is a metaphysical conception of justice that actually obtains, then Rawls' theory would not (and could not) be sensitive to it. Rawls himself admitted in Political Liberalism that "the political conception does without the truth." Similarly, in Law of Peoples, Rawls endorses a political conception of justice to govern the society of peoples that is not concerned with truth, but instead concerned with being sufficiently neutral so as to avoid conflict with any reasonable comprehensive doctrines. The odd result is that this neutrality excludes any conception of truth at all. Therefore, in times of crisis that demand incisive decision making based on scientific, economic or moral considerations, public reason will stall because it can contain no coherent conception of truth.

摘要

在《作为公平的正义:政治的而非形而上学的》一文中,约翰·罗尔斯提出了一种关于正义的公共观念的方法,该方法摒弃了对形而上学正义观念的任何依赖,转而支持一种政治正义观念。这意味着,如果存在一种实际成立的形而上学正义观念,那么罗尔斯的理论不会(也不可能)对其敏感。罗尔斯本人在《政治自由主义》中承认,“政治观念无需真理”。同样,在《万民法》中,罗尔斯支持一种政治正义观念来治理万民社会,这种观念不关注真理,而是关注足够中立,以避免与任何合理的综合性学说发生冲突。奇怪的结果是,这种中立性完全排除了任何真理观念。因此,在需要基于科学、经济或道德考量做出敏锐决策的危机时刻,公共理性将会停滞,因为它无法包含连贯的真理观念。

相似文献

1
Public Reason in a Pandemic: John Rawls on Truth in the Age of COVID-19.
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2022;50(3):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11406-021-00459-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Rawlsian justice and a human right to health care.
J Med Philos. 1983 Nov;8(4):329-38. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.4.329.
3
Overlapping consensus in pluralist societies: simulating Rawlsian full reflective equilibrium.
Synthese. 2024;203(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11229-023-04415-9. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
The relevance of Rawls' principle of justice for research on cognitively impaired patients.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(1):45-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1019552003103.
5
Applying Rawls to medical cases: an investigation into the usages of analytical philosophy.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Winter;10(4):749-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-4-749.
6
Rawls' theory of justice: a naturalistic evaluation(1).
J Med Philos. 2005 Oct;30(5):449-65. doi: 10.1080/03605310500253022.
7
Rawlsian justice in healthcare: a response to Cox and Fritz.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jun;48(6):413-415. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107144. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Rawls and Animal Moral Personality.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;13(7):1238. doi: 10.3390/ani13071238.
9
Liberalism, legal moralism and moral disagreement.
J Appl Philos. 2005;22(2):185-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00302.x.
10
Just Society as a Fair Game: John Rawls and Game Theory in the 1950s.
J Hist Ideas. 2017;78(2):299-308. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2017.0017.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验