Veteran Health Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):727-732. doi: 10.1177/19322968221074710. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of an electronic glucose monitoring system (eGMS) versus paper-based protocols (PBPs) to manage diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) within the VA setting.
This study is a retrospective chart review of patients on an insulin drip, treated in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) at Veteran Health Indiana for DKA or HHS. The primary outcome was evaluating the percentage of patients with hypoglycemia (blood glucose [BG] level <70 mg/dL) in patients admitted with DKA and HHS comparing an eGMS versus a PBP. A total of 168 patients were included in the analysis, with 84 patients in each group.
The primary outcome comparing rates of hypoglycemia in the eGMS group versus the PBP group showed a lower rate of hypoglycemia in the eGMS group (0.024%) compared with the PBP group (0.060%); however, this difference was not found to be statistically significant ( = .90). Statistically significant secondary outcomes include the percentage of glucose checks drawn within the protocol recommendation (80.7% vs 52.6%, = .02).
While the primary endpoint of decreased hypoglycemia was not found to be statistically significant, it did reduce the overall number of hypoglycemia events in the eGMS group compared with the PBP group which may be clinically significant. This demonstrates that eGMS use has the potential to minimize hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in a critically-ill Veteran population by individualizing insulin drip titration based on a variety of patient-specific factors and providing reminders for staff to obtain BG checks in a timely manner.
本研究旨在评估电子血糖监测系统(eGMS)与纸质方案(PBPs)在退伍军人事务部(VA)环境下管理糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)和高血糖高渗综合征(HHS)的安全性和有效性。
这是一项对印第安纳州退伍军人健康管理局急诊科(ED)或重症监护病房(ICU)接受胰岛素滴注治疗的 DKA 或 HHS 患者的回顾性图表审查。主要结局是评估 DKA 和 HHS 入院患者中低血糖(血糖 [BG] 水平<70mg/dL)患者的比例,比较 eGMS 与 PBP。共有 168 名患者纳入分析,每组 84 名患者。
与 PBP 组相比,eGMS 组低血糖发生率的主要结局显示低血糖发生率较低(0.024%比 0.060%);然而,这一差异没有统计学意义( =.90)。具有统计学意义的次要结局包括符合方案推荐的血糖检查百分比(80.7%比 52.6%, =.02)。
尽管未发现主要终点的低血糖发生率具有统计学意义,但与 PBP 组相比,eGMS 组确实减少了低血糖事件的总数,这可能具有临床意义。这表明,eGMS 的使用有可能通过根据各种患者特定因素个体化胰岛素滴注滴定,并及时提醒工作人员进行 BG 检查,从而最大限度地减少危重症退伍军人人群中的低血糖和血糖变异性。