• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在退伍军人事务部医院中,使用电子血糖监测系统与基于体重的剂量计算图表治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒和高血糖高渗综合征的安全性和有效性。

Safety and Effectiveness of the Use of an Electronic Glucose Monitoring System Versus Weight-Based Dosing Nomogram for Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Syndrome in a VA Hospital.

机构信息

Veteran Health Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):727-732. doi: 10.1177/19322968221074710. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1177/19322968221074710
PMID:35128975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10210101/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of an electronic glucose monitoring system (eGMS) versus paper-based protocols (PBPs) to manage diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) within the VA setting.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of patients on an insulin drip, treated in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) at Veteran Health Indiana for DKA or HHS. The primary outcome was evaluating the percentage of patients with hypoglycemia (blood glucose [BG] level <70 mg/dL) in patients admitted with DKA and HHS comparing an eGMS versus a PBP. A total of 168 patients were included in the analysis, with 84 patients in each group.

RESULTS

The primary outcome comparing rates of hypoglycemia in the eGMS group versus the PBP group showed a lower rate of hypoglycemia in the eGMS group (0.024%) compared with the PBP group (0.060%); however, this difference was not found to be statistically significant ( = .90). Statistically significant secondary outcomes include the percentage of glucose checks drawn within the protocol recommendation (80.7% vs 52.6%, = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

While the primary endpoint of decreased hypoglycemia was not found to be statistically significant, it did reduce the overall number of hypoglycemia events in the eGMS group compared with the PBP group which may be clinically significant. This demonstrates that eGMS use has the potential to minimize hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in a critically-ill Veteran population by individualizing insulin drip titration based on a variety of patient-specific factors and providing reminders for staff to obtain BG checks in a timely manner.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估电子血糖监测系统(eGMS)与纸质方案(PBPs)在退伍军人事务部(VA)环境下管理糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)和高血糖高渗综合征(HHS)的安全性和有效性。

方法

这是一项对印第安纳州退伍军人健康管理局急诊科(ED)或重症监护病房(ICU)接受胰岛素滴注治疗的 DKA 或 HHS 患者的回顾性图表审查。主要结局是评估 DKA 和 HHS 入院患者中低血糖(血糖 [BG] 水平<70mg/dL)患者的比例,比较 eGMS 与 PBP。共有 168 名患者纳入分析,每组 84 名患者。

结果

与 PBP 组相比,eGMS 组低血糖发生率的主要结局显示低血糖发生率较低(0.024%比 0.060%);然而,这一差异没有统计学意义( =.90)。具有统计学意义的次要结局包括符合方案推荐的血糖检查百分比(80.7%比 52.6%, =.02)。

结论

尽管未发现主要终点的低血糖发生率具有统计学意义,但与 PBP 组相比,eGMS 组确实减少了低血糖事件的总数,这可能具有临床意义。这表明,eGMS 的使用有可能通过根据各种患者特定因素个体化胰岛素滴注滴定,并及时提醒工作人员进行 BG 检查,从而最大限度地减少危重症退伍军人人群中的低血糖和血糖变异性。

相似文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of the Use of an Electronic Glucose Monitoring System Versus Weight-Based Dosing Nomogram for Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Syndrome in a VA Hospital.在退伍军人事务部医院中,使用电子血糖监测系统与基于体重的剂量计算图表治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒和高血糖高渗综合征的安全性和有效性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):727-732. doi: 10.1177/19322968221074710. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
2
Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Isolated or Combined Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State: A Retrospective, Hospital-Based Cohort Study.单纯糖尿病酮症酸中毒与高血糖高渗综合征患者的临床结局:一项回顾性基于医院的队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):349-357. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1168. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
4
Clinical profiles, outcomes and risk factors among type 2 diabetic inpatients with diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state: a hospital-based analysis over a 6-year period.2型糖尿病合并糖尿病酮症酸中毒和高血糖高渗状态住院患者的临床特征、结局及危险因素:一项为期6年的基于医院的分析
BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00659-5.
5
Moderate-Intensity Insulin Therapy Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State.中强度胰岛素治疗与伴有糖尿病酮症酸中毒和高渗高血糖综合征的危重症患者的住院时间缩短相关。
Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):700-705. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003709.
6
[Diabetic emergencies : Hypoglycemia, ketoacidotic and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic coma].[糖尿病急症:低血糖、酮症酸中毒和高血糖高渗性非酮症昏迷]
Internist (Berl). 2017 Oct;58(10):1020-1028. doi: 10.1007/s00108-017-0317-x.
7
Evaluation of Computer-Based Insulin Infusion Algorithm Compared With a Paper-Based Protocol in the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.基于计算机的胰岛素输注算法与纸质方案在糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗中的比较评估。
J Pharm Technol. 2023 Apr;39(2):82-87. doi: 10.1177/87551225231160050. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
8
DKA/HHS insulin infusion protocol adherence and patient outcomes in Shellharbour Hospital.谢尔本港医院 DKA/HHS 胰岛素输注方案依从性与患者结局。
Intern Med J. 2023 Dec;53(12):2277-2282. doi: 10.1111/imj.16151. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF GLUCOSTABILIZER IN THE MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS.糖稳定剂在糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗中的安全性和疗效。
Endocr Pract. 2020 Jun 2;26(6):627-633. doi: 10.4158/EP-2019-0510. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10
Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)/Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State (HHS): Novel Advances in the Management of Hyperglycemic Crises (UK Versus USA).糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)/高血糖高渗状态(HHS)的治疗:高血糖危象管理的新进展(英国与美国对比)
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 May;17(5):33. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0857-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Computer-Based versus Paper-Based Insulin Infusion Algorithms in Diabetic Ketoacidosis.糖尿病酮症酸中毒中基于计算机与基于纸质的胰岛素输注算法对比
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(6):628-634. doi: 10.2174/1573399815666190712191932.
2
Evaluating the Implementation of the EndoTool Glycemic Control Software System.评估EndoTool血糖控制软件系统的实施情况。
Diabetes Spectr. 2018 Feb;31(1):26-30. doi: 10.2337/ds16-0061.
3
Comparison of Computer-Guided Versus Standard Insulin Infusion Regimens in Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis.糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者中计算机引导与标准胰岛素输注方案的比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1932296817750899.
4
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.