Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;176(4):357-364. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6308.
Most parenting programs target parents of children with severe behavioral problems. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of universal parenting programs, especially for families with low income.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the KeySteps@JC Parent-Child Interaction Program for low-income families in Hong Kong.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A parallel, unblinded, cluster, randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 2018 to June 2019. Eight participating preschools in Hong Kong were randomly assigned (1:1) using an online randomization plan generator into intervention (immediate) and waiting list control (delayed) groups. Intervention participants included the parents of children in kindergarten grade 1. The results were processed by an intention-to-treat analysis.
KeySteps@JC Parent-Child Interaction program.
The primary outcome was child behavioral problems, which were assessed using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were parental emotion coaching, involvement in child reading and play, and parent stress levels, which were assessed using Chinese-validated versions of the Parent Reading Belief Inventory, the Chinese Parent-Child Interaction Scale, the Emotion-Related Parenting Styles, and the Parental Stress Scale questionnaires. Parents in the intervention group participated in a training program consisting of 20 weekly 1.5-hour sessions on child behavior management, emotion coaching, dialogic reading, and interactive play. The primary hypothesis was that child behavior problems would be reduced after the intervention. The main analysis was a mixed-method regression with group status as the independent variable.
A total of 267 parents (mean age, intervention group: 33.8 years; 95% CI, 32.9-34.7 years; waiting list group: 35.7 years; 95% CI, 34.5-36.9 years) participated in the program. The intervention group included 153 participants (57.3%), and the waiting list group included 114 participants (42.7%). Among the target children (mean age, intervention group: 3.5 years; 95% CI, 3.4-3.5 years; waiting list group: 3.4 years; 95% CI, 3.4-3.5 years), there were 88 boys (57.5%) in the intervention group and 59 boys (51.8%) in the waiting list group. At postintervention, the intervention group reported a statistically significant improvement in children's behavior (Cohen d, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.04-0.53); parents' use of emotion-coaching strategies, including feelings of uncertainty or ineffectiveness in emotion socialization (Cohen d, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50) and parental rejection of negative emotion (Cohen d, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.08-0.57); and involvement in child reading (Cohen d, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.41).
The results of this randomized clinical trial provide promising evidence on the effectiveness of a multicomponent parenting intervention in preparing children from low-income families to be more socially and emotionally ready for school.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03615937.
大多数育儿计划针对的是有严重行为问题的儿童的父母。关于普及性育儿计划的有效性,特别是对于低收入家庭,证据有限。
评估 KeySteps@JC 亲子互动计划对香港低收入家庭的有效性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项平行、非盲、集群、随机临床试验,于 2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 6 月进行。香港的 8 家参与幼儿园被随机分配(1:1),使用在线随机分组生成器分为干预(立即)和候补名单控制(延迟)组。干预组包括幼儿园 1 年级儿童的父母。结果通过意向治疗分析进行处理。
KeySteps@JC 亲子互动计划。
主要结果是儿童行为问题,使用《困难与强项问卷》进行评估。次要结果是父母的情绪辅导、参与儿童阅读和游戏,以及父母的压力水平,使用经过验证的中文版本的《家长阅读信念量表》、《中国亲子互动量表》、《情绪相关教养风格量表》和《父母压力量表》进行评估。干预组的父母参加了一个培训计划,包括 20 个每周 1.5 小时的课程,内容涉及儿童行为管理、情绪辅导、对话阅读和互动游戏。主要假设是干预后儿童的行为问题会减少。主要分析是混合方法回归,以组状态为自变量。
共有 267 位家长(平均年龄,干预组:33.8 岁;95%置信区间,32.9-34.7 岁;候补名单组:35.7 岁;95%置信区间,34.5-36.9 岁)参加了该计划。干预组包括 153 名参与者(57.3%),候补名单组包括 114 名参与者(42.7%)。在目标儿童(平均年龄,干预组:3.5 岁;95%置信区间,3.4-3.5 岁;候补名单组:3.4 岁;95%置信区间,3.4-3.5 岁)中,干预组有 88 名男孩(57.5%),候补名单组有 59 名男孩(51.8%)。在干预后,干预组报告了儿童行为的统计学显著改善(Cohen d,0.29;95%置信区间,0.04-0.53);父母使用情绪辅导策略的情况有所改善,包括在情绪社会化方面感到不确定或无效(Cohen d,0.26;95%置信区间,0.01-0.50)和父母对负面情绪的拒绝(Cohen d,0.33;95%置信区间,0.08-0.57);以及参与儿童阅读(Cohen d,0.17;95%置信区间,-0.07 至 0.41)。
这项随机临床试验的结果提供了有希望的证据,证明了多成分育儿干预在使来自低收入家庭的儿童为更积极地迎接学校生活的社交和情感挑战做好准备方面的有效性。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03615937。