British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):809-814. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2010256.
To evaluate how an international one-year intensive research training program for addiction medicine physicians contributed to subsequent research involvement and productivity. We prospectively compared addiction medicine physician fellows admitted to a one-year training program with non-admitted controls, using baseline questionnaire and peer-reviewed publication data. Participants' publication activity was assessed from fellowship application date onwards using biomedical databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase). Between July 2014 and June 2020, which is six years of cohorts, 56 (39 women) physicians, both fellows ( = 25) and non-admitted applicants ( = 31), were observed and included in the study, contributing 261 person-years of observation. At baseline, in the fellows' cohort: 76% of participants (19/25) reported past research involvement, 24% (6/25) had one or more advanced graduate degrees (e.g., MPH), and the median number of peer-reviewed, first author publications was one (Interquartile Range [IQR] = 0-2). At baseline, in the controls' cohort: 84% of participants (26/31) reported past research involvement, 39% (12/31) had one or more advanced graduate degrees, and the median number of peer-reviewed, first author publications was zero. The physicians' training included internal medicine ( = 8), family medicine ( = 33), psychiatry ( = 5) and others ( = 4). At follow up, there was a significant difference between fellows ( = 25) and controls ( = 31) in total number of publications (Rate Ratio [RR] = 13.09, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 5.01 - 34.21, 0.001), as well as first author publications (RR = 5.59, 95% CI, 2.23 - 14.06, 0.001). In the six-year observation period, fellows' productivity indicates undertaking this fellowship was associated with significant research outputs in comparison to controls, signaling successful training of addiction physicians to help recruit addiction medicine physicians to participate in addiction research.
评估为期一年的国际成瘾医学医师强化研究培训计划如何促进随后的研究参与和成果。我们使用基线问卷和同行评审出版物数据,前瞻性地比较了参加为期一年培训计划的成瘾医学医师研究员和未参加的对照组。使用生物医学数据库(例如 PubMed、Embase),从研究员申请日期起评估参与者的出版物活动。2014 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月,即六年的队列中,观察到并纳入了 56 名(39 名女性)医生,包括研究员( = 25)和未被录取的申请人( = 31),共观察了 261 人年。在基线时,在研究员队列中:76%的参与者(19/25)报告过去有研究参与,24%(6/25)拥有一个或多个高级研究生学位(例如,MPH),并且同行评审的第一作者出版物中位数为一个(四分位距 [IQR] = 0-2)。在基线时,在对照组队列中:84%的参与者(26/31)报告过去有研究参与,39%(12/31)拥有一个或多个高级研究生学位,并且同行评审的第一作者出版物中位数为零。医生的培训包括内科( = 8)、家庭医学( = 33)、精神病学( = 5)和其他( = 4)。随访时,研究员( = 25)和对照组( = 31)在总出版物数量上存在显著差异(RR = 13.09,95%置信区间 [CI],5.01-34.21, 0.001),以及第一作者出版物(RR = 5.59,95% CI,2.23-14.06, 0.001)。在六年的观察期内,研究员的成果表明,与对照组相比,参加该研究员计划与显著的研究成果相关,表明成功培训成瘾医生有助于招募成瘾医学医生参与成瘾研究。