Suppr超能文献

针对药物滥用研究领域早期研究人员的科学写作研讨会。

Scientific writing seminar for early-stage investigators in substance abuse research.

作者信息

Guydish Joseph, Masson Carmen, Flentje Annesa, Shopshire Michael, Sorensen James L

机构信息

a Institute for Health Policy Studies , University of California , San Francisco , California , USA.

b Department of Psychiatry , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA.

出版信息

Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):238-41. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1028698. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little information on how to increase the scientific writing productivity of early-stage investigators in the addictions field. A scientific writing seminar is presented in this article, aiming to encourage manuscript writing and dissemination of addiction research, and outcomes are reported for 14 years of the seminar.

METHODS

In 14 years, there were 113 postdoctoral fellow enrollments in a 6-month writing seminar. Records of submission and publication rates of manuscripts were collected for 14 cohorts.

RESULTS

Of the 113 participant enrollments, 97 (86%) submitted a manuscript for publication, and 87 participants (77%) published their manuscript.

CONCLUSIONS

A scientific writing seminar may benefit writing productivity, but more research is needed to compare this training model with other existing models.

摘要

背景

关于如何提高成瘾领域早期研究人员的科学写作效率,相关信息较少。本文介绍了一个科学写作研讨会,旨在鼓励撰写成瘾研究稿件并促进其传播,并报告了该研讨会14年的成果。

方法

在14年里,有113名博士后研究员参加了为期6个月的写作研讨会。收集了14个队列的稿件提交和发表率记录。

结果

在113名参与者中,97人(86%)提交了稿件以供发表,87名参与者(77%)发表了他们的稿件。

结论

科学写作研讨会可能有助于提高写作效率,但需要更多研究将这种培训模式与其他现有模式进行比较。

相似文献

1
Scientific writing seminar for early-stage investigators in substance abuse research.
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):238-41. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1028698. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
2
Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2001 Dec;25(1-4):167-75. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.167.
3
Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Impact of a remotely delivered, writing for publication program on publication outcomes of novice researchers.
Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4468. doi: 10.22605/RRH4468. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Caveats in the proficient preparation of an APA-style research manuscript for publication.
Body Image. 2009 Jan;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
8
Publishing particulars: Part 3. General writing tips, editing, and responding to peer review.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023 Mar 1;324(3):R409-R424. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00270.2022. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
An Institutional Postdoctoral Research Training Program: Increasing Productivity of Postdoctoral Trainees.
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;40(2):207-12. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0281-5. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Strategies to successfully publish your first manuscript.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010 Aug;54(4):395-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02186.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a writing group to promote faculty scholarship.
Nurse Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181c42133.
3
Facilitating scholarly writing in academic medicine.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21143.x.
4
"Short stops": peer support of scholarly activity.
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):939. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00045.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验