Suppr超能文献

高通量 qPCR 和 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序作为奶酪微生物组研究的互补方法。

High-throughput qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as complementary methods for the investigation of the cheese microbiota.

机构信息

Agroscope, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, CH-3003, Bern, Switzerland.

Laboratory of Microbiology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02451-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and especially 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing have become indispensable tools in microbial ecology. While they have opened up new possibilities for studying microbial communities, they also have one drawback, namely providing only relative abundances and thus compositional data. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has been used for years for the quantification of bacteria. However, this method requires the development of specific primers and has a low throughput. The constraint of low throughput has recently been overcome by the development of high-throughput qPCR (HT-qPCR), which allows for the simultaneous detection of the most prevalent bacteria in moderately complex systems, such as cheese and other fermented dairy foods. In the present study, the performance of the two approaches, NGS and HT-qPCR, was compared by analyzing the same DNA samples from 21 Raclette du Valais protected designation of origin (PDO) cheeses. Based on the results obtained, the differences, accuracy, and usefulness of the two approaches were studied in detail.

RESULTS

The results obtained using NGS (non-targeted) and HT-qPCR (targeted) show considerable agreement in determining the microbial composition of the cheese DNA samples studied, albeit the fundamentally different nature of these two approaches. A few inconsistencies in species detection were observed, particularly for less abundant ones. The detailed comparison of the results for 15 bacterial species/groups measured by both methods revealed a considerable bias for certain bacterial species in the measurements of the amplicon sequencing approach. We identified as probable origin to this PCR bias due to primer mismatches, variations in the number of copies for the 16S rRNA gene, and bias introduced in the bioinformatics analysis.

CONCLUSION

As the normalized microbial composition results of NGS and HT-qPCR agreed for most of the 21 cheese samples analyzed, both methods can be considered as complementary and reliable for studying the microbial composition of cheese. Their combined application proved to be very helpful in identifying potential biases and overcoming methodological limitations in the quantitative analysis of the cheese microbiota.

摘要

背景

下一代测序(NGS)方法,尤其是 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序,已成为微生物生态学中不可或缺的工具。虽然它们为研究微生物群落开辟了新的可能性,但也有一个缺点,即只能提供相对丰度,也就是组成数据。多年来,定量 PCR(qPCR)一直被用于细菌定量。然而,这种方法需要开发特定的引物,并且通量较低。最近,高通量 qPCR(HT-qPCR)的发展克服了通量低的限制,它允许同时检测中度复杂系统(如奶酪和其他发酵乳制品)中最常见的细菌。在本研究中,通过分析 21 份瓦莱州奶酪(Raclette du Valais)原产地保护名称(PDO)奶酪的相同 DNA 样本,比较了 NGS 和 HT-qPCR 这两种方法的性能。基于获得的结果,详细研究了这两种方法的差异、准确性和有用性。

结果

使用 NGS(非靶向)和 HT-qPCR(靶向)获得的结果在确定研究的奶酪 DNA 样本的微生物组成方面显示出相当大的一致性,尽管这两种方法的性质根本不同。在检测物种方面观察到一些不一致的情况,特别是对于较少丰度的物种。通过这两种方法测量的 15 种细菌物种/组的详细比较结果表明,在扩增子测序方法的测量中,某些细菌物种存在相当大的偏差。我们认为这种 PCR 偏差的可能原因是引物错配、16S rRNA 基因拷贝数的变化以及生物信息学分析中的偏差。

结论

由于 NGS 和 HT-qPCR 的归一化微生物组成结果在分析的 21 个奶酪样本中的大部分都一致,因此这两种方法都可以被认为是互补的,可以用于研究奶酪的微生物组成。它们的联合应用证明在确定奶酪微生物组定量分析中的潜在偏差和克服方法学限制方面非常有帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eee/8819918/b3297cfae260/12866_2022_2451_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验