Cardiff University, School of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, CF10 3AX, UK.
Cardiff University, School of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, CF10 3AX, UK.
Chemosphere. 2022 May;295:133879. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133879. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Chemical pollutants are a major factor implicated in freshwater habitat degradation and species loss. Microplastics and glyphosate-based herbicides are prevalent pollutants with known detrimental effects on animal welfare but our understanding of their impacts on infection dynamics are limited. Within freshwater vertebrates, glyphosate formulations reduce fish tolerance to infections, but the effects of microplastic consumption on disease tolerance have thus far not been assessed. Here, we investigated how microplastic (polypropylene) and the commercial glyphosate-based herbicide, Roundup®, impact fish tolerance to infectious disease and mortality utilising a model fish host-pathogen system. For uninfected fish, microplastic and Roundup had contrasting impacts on mortality as individual stressors, with microplastic increasing and Roundup decreasing mortality compared with control fish not exposed to pollutants. Concerningly, microplastic and Roundup combined had a strong interactive reversal effect by significantly increasing host mortality for uninfected fish (73% mortality). For infected fish, the individual stressors also had contrasting effects on mortality, with microplastic consumption not significantly affecting mortality and Roundup increasing mortality to 55%. When combined, these two pollutants had a moderate interactive synergistic effect on mortality levels of infected fish (53% mortality). Both microplastic and Roundup individually had significant and contrasting impacts on pathogen metrics with microplastic consumption resulting in fish maintaining infections for significantly longer and Roundup significantly reducing pathogen burdens. When combined, the two pollutants had a largely additive effect in reducing pathogen burdens. This study is the first to reveal that microplastic and Roundup individually and interactively impact host-pathogen dynamics and can prove fatal to fish.
化学污染物是导致淡水生境退化和物种丧失的一个主要因素。微塑料和草甘膦类除草剂是常见的污染物,已知它们对动物福利有不利影响,但我们对它们对感染动态的影响的了解有限。在淡水脊椎动物中,草甘膦制剂降低了鱼类对感染的耐受性,但迄今为止,还没有评估微塑料摄入对疾病耐受性的影响。在这里,我们利用鱼类-病原体模型系统,研究了微塑料(聚丙烯)和商业草甘膦类除草剂农达®如何影响鱼类对传染性疾病的耐受性和死亡率。对于未感染的鱼类,微塑料和农达作为个体应激源对死亡率有相反的影响,与未接触污染物的对照鱼类相比,微塑料增加了死亡率,而农达降低了死亡率。令人担忧的是,微塑料和农达联合使用时具有强烈的交互反转效应,显著增加了未感染鱼类的宿主死亡率(73%的死亡率)。对于感染的鱼类,个体应激源对死亡率也有相反的影响,微塑料的摄入对死亡率没有显著影响,而农达将死亡率提高到 55%。当这两种污染物结合使用时,对感染鱼类的死亡率有适度的交互协同作用(53%的死亡率)。微塑料和农达单独使用时对病原体指标都有显著的、相反的影响,微塑料的摄入导致鱼类感染持续时间显著延长,而农达显著降低了病原体负担。当两者结合使用时,两种污染物在降低病原体负担方面具有主要的加性效应。这项研究首次揭示了微塑料和农达单独和交互作用会影响宿主-病原体动态,对鱼类可能是致命的。