• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ABCD-GENE 评分与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局:来自 TAILOR-PCI 试验的见解。

ABCD-GENE Score and Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the TAILOR-PCI Trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco"University of Catania Catania Italy.

Division of Cardiology University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville Florida.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e024156. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024156. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.024156
PMID:35132875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9245815/
Abstract

Background In TAILOR-PCI, genotype-guided selection of P2Y inhibitors after percutaneous coronary intervention did not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic events at 12 months. The Age, Body Mass Index, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes, and Genotyping (ABCD-GENE) score identifies patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel at increased risk of ischemic events. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the ABCD-GENE score for tailoring P2Y inhibitor selection after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results In a post hoc analysis of the TAILOR-PCI, outcomes were analyzed by ABCD-GENE score and allocation to genotype-guided or conventional P2Y inhibitor selection. Primary (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and secondary (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or severe recurrent ischemia) outcomes were assessed. Among 3883 patients discharged on clopidogrel in the genotype-guided and conventional therapy groups, 15.8% and 84.2% had high (≥10 points) or low (<10) ABCD-GENE scores, respectively. At 12 months, both the primary (5.2% versus 2.6%, <0.001) and secondary outcomes (7.7% versus 4.6%, =0.001) were significantly increased in patients with high ABCD-GENE score. Among 4714 patients allocated to genotype-guided or conventional therapy, the former did not significantly reduce the 12-month risk of the primary and secondary outcomes in both the high and low ABCD-GENE score groups (p=0.48 and 0.27, respectively). Conclusions Among patients with percutaneous coronary intervention on clopidogrel, the ABCD-GENE score was helpful in identifying those at higher risk. The ABCD-GENE score may potentially enhance the precision of tailored selection of P2Y inhibitors, which needs to be confirmed in prospective investigations. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT01742117.

摘要

背景

在 TAILOR-PCI 研究中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后根据基因型选择 P2Y 抑制剂并不能显著降低 12 个月时的缺血事件风险。年龄、体重指数、慢性肾脏病、糖尿病和基因分型(ABCD-GENE)评分可识别出氯吡格雷高血小板反应性的患者,这些患者发生缺血事件的风险增加。本研究旨在探讨 ABCD-GENE 评分在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后个体化选择 P2Y 抑制剂中的价值。

方法和结果

在 TAILOR-PCI 的事后分析中,根据 ABCD-GENE 评分和分配给基因型指导或常规 P2Y 抑制剂选择的情况分析结局。主要(死亡、心肌梗死或卒中)和次要(心血管死亡、心肌梗死、卒中、支架血栓形成或严重复发性缺血)结局。在基因型指导和常规治疗组中,3883 例出院时服用氯吡格雷的患者中,分别有 15.8%和 84.2%的患者 ABCD-GENE 评分较高(≥10 分)或较低(<10 分)。在 12 个月时,高 ABCD-GENE 评分患者的主要(5.2%比 2.6%,<0.001)和次要结局(7.7%比 4.6%,=0.001)均显著增加。在分配至基因型指导或常规治疗的 4714 例患者中,前者在高和低 ABCD-GENE 评分组中均未显著降低 12 个月时的主要和次要结局风险(分别为 p=0.48 和 0.27)。

结论

在接受氯吡格雷 PCI 的患者中,ABCD-GENE 评分有助于识别风险较高的患者。ABCD-GENE 评分可能有助于提高 P2Y 抑制剂个体化选择的精确性,这需要在前瞻性研究中得到证实。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。

独特识别码

NCT01742117。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/422a2e18d269/JAH3-11-e024156-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/b1b7ffee9807/JAH3-11-e024156-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/190dd38b84c8/JAH3-11-e024156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/2b777d9dfcc0/JAH3-11-e024156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/422a2e18d269/JAH3-11-e024156-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/b1b7ffee9807/JAH3-11-e024156-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/190dd38b84c8/JAH3-11-e024156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/2b777d9dfcc0/JAH3-11-e024156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d669/9245815/422a2e18d269/JAH3-11-e024156-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
ABCD-GENE Score and Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the TAILOR-PCI Trial.ABCD-GENE 评分与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局:来自 TAILOR-PCI 试验的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e024156. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024156. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.基因指导的口服 P2Y12 抑制剂选择与常规氯吡格雷治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血结局的影响:TAILOR-PCI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):761-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12443.
3
Sex-Specific Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the TAILOR-PCI Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的性别差异:来自 TAILOR-PCI 试验的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(12):e024709. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024709. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Safety and Efficacy of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Escalation of P2Y Inhibitor Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Kidney Disease: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TAILOR-PCI Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后基于 CYP2C19 基因型指导的 P2Y 抑制剂治疗剂量递增在慢性肾脏病患者中的疗效和安全性:TAILOR-PCI 研究的事后分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Jun;38(3):447-457. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07392-2. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Derivation, Validation, and Prognostic Utility of a Prediction Rule for Nonresponse to Clopidogrel: The ABCD-GENE Score.抗血小板药物氯吡格雷无应答预测评分:ABCD-GENE 评分的推导、验证及预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.226.
6
Impact of the ABCD-GENE Score on Clopidogrel Clinical Effectiveness after PCI: A Multi-Site, Real-World Investigation.ABCD-GENE 评分对 PCI 后氯吡格雷临床疗效的影响:一项多中心、真实世界的研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;112(1):146-155. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2612. Epub 2022 May 2.
7
Genotype-Guided P2Y Inhibitor Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Bayesian Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后基于基因型的 P2Y 抑制剂治疗:贝叶斯分析。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021 Dec;14(6):e003353. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003353. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
8
Differential Impact of Clinical Factors for Predicting High Platelet Reactivity on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Clopidogrel and Prasugrel.临床因素对氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗急性心肌梗死患者高血小板反应性预测对临床结局的影响差异。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Dec 1;30(12):1791-1802. doi: 10.5551/jat.64217. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
9
Genetic-Guided Oral P2Y Inhibitor Selection and Cumulative Ischemic Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基因指导的口服 P2Y 抑制剂选择与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的累积缺血事件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.356.
10
Effectiveness of Clopidogrel vs Alternative P2Y Inhibitors Based on the ABCD-GENE Score.ABCD-GENE 评分指导的氯吡格雷与其他 P2Y12 抑制剂的疗效比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Apr 16;83(15):1370-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor based on the ABCD-GENE score in acute coronary syndrome patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.基于ABCD-GENE评分比较氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的有效性。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1606327. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1606327. eCollection 2025.
2
Current Antithrombotic Treatments for Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.心血管疾病的当前抗血栓治疗:全面综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 8;25(8):281. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508281. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Evaluating the Effect of Estimating Renal Function With the CKD-EPI 2021 Equation on the ABCD-GENE Score for Clopidogrel Response Prediction.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale, evidence and practical recommendations.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的基因检测:原理、证据和实用建议。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;14(8):963-978. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1927709. Epub 2021 May 26.
2
Guided versus standard antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中接受指导与标准抗血小板治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2021 Apr 17;397(10283):1470-1483. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00533-X.
3
Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2Y Inhibitor Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.
评估应用 CKD-EPI 2021 方程估算肾功能对氯吡格雷反应预测的 ABCD-GENE 评分的效果。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Nov;116(5):1227-1230. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3385. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Clopidogrel resistance and its relevance: Current concepts.氯吡格雷抵抗及其相关性:当前概念
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Jun;13(6):2187-2199. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1473_23. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Effectiveness of Clopidogrel vs Alternative P2Y Inhibitors Based on the ABCD-GENE Score.ABCD-GENE 评分指导的氯吡格雷与其他 P2Y12 抑制剂的疗效比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Apr 16;83(15):1370-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.015.
6
Advances and Perspectives in methods for identifying high platelet reactivity.识别高血小板反应性方法的进展与展望
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 11;9(12):e22214. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22214. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Utility of the ACD-GENE-CLI Score in Asian Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Interventions.在接受血管内介入治疗的亚洲危重症肢体缺血患者中,ACDGENE-CLI 评分的效用。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 May 1;31(5):572-586. doi: 10.5551/jat.64326. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
8
Patient-Related Factors Predicting Stent Thrombosis in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中预测支架血栓形成的患者相关因素。
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7367. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237367.
9
Validating the Prognostic Utility of the ABCD-GENE Score in Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients on Clopidogrel.验证ABCD-GENE评分在接受氯吡格雷治疗的亚洲急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的预后效用。
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Oct 31;18:e60. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2023.27. eCollection 2023.
10
Personalized Approaches to Antiplatelet Treatment for Cardiovascular Diseases: An Umbrella Review.心血管疾病抗血小板治疗的个性化方法:一项伞状综述
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023 Nov 3;16:973-990. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S391400. eCollection 2023.
CYP2C19 基因型对口服 P2Y 抑制剂治疗期间缺血结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 12;14(7):739-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Validation of the ABCD-GENE score to identify high platelet reactivity in east Asian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.验证 ABCD-GENE 评分在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的东亚患者中识别血小板高反应性的价值。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 15;327:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
Trial Design Principles for Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中高出血风险患者的试验设计原则:美国心脏病学会科学专家小组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 22;76(12):1468-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.085.
6
Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.基因指导的口服 P2Y12 抑制剂选择与常规氯吡格雷治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血结局的影响:TAILOR-PCI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):761-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12443.
7
CYP2C19 Genotyping to Guide Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: One Size Rarely Fits All.CYP2C19基因分型指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗血小板治疗:一刀切的方法很少适用。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):747-749. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.13094.
8
Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Genotypes: Results of a Randomized Pharmacodynamic Study in a Feasibility Investigation of Rapid Genetic Testing.携带CYP2C19功能缺失基因型患者中普拉格雷与替格瑞洛的比较:快速基因检测可行性研究中的一项随机药效学研究结果
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 25;5(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.009. eCollection 2020 May.
9
Derivation, Validation, and Prognostic Utility of a Prediction Rule for Nonresponse to Clopidogrel: The ABCD-GENE Score.抗血小板药物氯吡格雷无应答预测评分:ABCD-GENE 评分的推导、验证及预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.226.
10
A Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Primary PCI.一种基于基因型的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中口服 P2Y12 抑制剂的策略。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1621-1631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907096. Epub 2019 Sep 3.