1Hepatology and Gastroenterology Department, Medical Center Mrcheveli, Tbilisi; 3University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
2Health Research Union/Clinic NEOLAB, Tbilisi; 3University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Georgian Med News. 2022 Jan(322):26-29.
Hepatitis B virus infection remains one of the major healthcare problems in Georgia with an exposure prevalence of 25.9% (Positive Anti-HBc) and chronic HBV infection (Positive HBsAg) 2.9%. Determination of clinical phase of chronic HBV infection is crucial for evaluation prognosis and accordingly, initiation of antiviral treatment, which might be lifelong. The specific aim of our study was to collect data on clinical characteristics of HBV-infected patients and determine the clinical phases of chronic HBV infection in the Georgian population. We randomly selected 111 chronic HBV-infected patients from the database of the medical center Mrcheveli. Liver fibrosis was assessed by Fibroscan, and viral load data were computed by the Real Time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology. Liver fibrosis results were available for 74 of the patients (67%), and a majority of patients (72 of the 74, 97%) had no signs of advanced liver fibrosis. Viral load data were available for 94 patients, of whom 70 (74.5%) had an HBV-DNA level less than 2000 IU/ml, while 18 (19.1%) had an HBV-DNA level between 2000 and 20000 IU/ml and 6 (6.4%) were higher than 20000 IU/ml. Data for the assessment of the clinical phase of chronic HBV infection were available for 54% of patients (60 of the 111). Only 3.3% (2/60) of patients had undetectable HBV-DNA and 75% (45/60) had a viral load <2000 IU/ml. Two patients were HBeAg-positive, one of them with hepatitis and another with normal ALT. A few patients classified as HBeAg-negative with chronic hepatitis given normal ALT criteria: 3/60 (5%) by EASL and 6/50 (10%) patients by AASLD. In summary, 11/60 (18.5%) and 8/60 (13.5%) patients had HBV-DNA >2000 IU/ml but a normal ALT. Given the small number of patients, we cautiously conclude that most patients (75%) had HBeAg-positive or -negative chronic HBV infection without hepatitis. However, up to 19% of patients were not possible to classify in any of the internationally recognized phases of HBV infection. Patients within this indeterminate grey area, should be evaluated cautiously and management needs to be individualized. It will be interesting to evaluate the reason high viral load in HBeAg negative patients with normal ALT and long-term outcome among these patients (liver fibroses and/or HCC development).
乙型肝炎病毒感染仍然是格鲁吉亚主要的医疗保健问题之一,其暴露流行率为 25.9%(抗-HBc 阳性)和慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染 2.9%(HBsAg 阳性)。确定慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的临床阶段对于评估预后并相应地启动可能是终身的抗病毒治疗至关重要。我们研究的具体目的是收集乙型肝炎病毒感染患者的临床特征数据,并确定格鲁吉亚人群中慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的临床阶段。我们从 Mrcheveli 医疗中心的数据库中随机选择了 111 名慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者。通过 Fibroscan 评估肝纤维化,通过实时聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 方法计算病毒载量数据。74 名患者(67%)的肝纤维化结果可用,大多数患者(74 名患者中的 72 名,97%)没有晚期肝纤维化的迹象。94 名患者的病毒载量数据可用,其中 70 名(74.5%)HBV-DNA 水平低于 2000 IU/ml,18 名(19.1%)HBV-DNA 水平在 2000 至 20000 IU/ml 之间,6 名(6.4%)高于 20000 IU/ml。54%(60 名患者中有 60 名)的患者有用于评估慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染临床阶段的数据。只有 3.3%(2/60)的患者 HBV-DNA 不可检测,75%(45/60)的患者病毒载量<2000 IU/ml。两名患者 HBeAg 阳性,其中一名患有肝炎,另一名 ALT 正常。少数患者被归类为 HBeAg 阴性慢性乙型肝炎但 ALT 正常:EASL 为 3/60(5%),AASLD 为 6/50(10%)。总之,11/60(18.5%)和 8/60(13.5%)患者的 HBV-DNA>2000 IU/ml 但 ALT 正常。由于患者数量较少,我们谨慎地得出结论,大多数患者(75%)患有 HBeAg 阳性或阴性慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染而无肝炎。然而,多达 19%的患者无法归入任何国际公认的乙型肝炎病毒感染阶段。在这个不确定的灰色区域内的患者,应谨慎评估,治疗需要个体化。评估 HBeAg 阴性但 ALT 正常且病毒载量较高的患者的原因以及这些患者的长期结果(肝纤维化和/或 HCC 发展)将是有趣的。