Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像评估钙化性肌腱炎与肩袖损伤的相关性。

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the correlation between calcific tendinitis and rotator cuff injury.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Fifth Centre Hospital of Tianjin, No. 41 of Zhejiang Road, Binhai New District, Tianjin, 300450, China.

Department of Radiology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00746-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the incidence of calcific tendinitis (CaT) in rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and to assess the correlation between CaT and RCTs with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

The MRI of 108 patients with rotator cuff CaT admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Another retrospective analysis was made of 108 patients with similar age, gender, occupation, and shoulder injury side to those in the first group. The incidence of RCTs and their correlation with CaT were assessed based on an MRI of shoulder joints.

RESULTS

There was a statistical difference (p < 0.05) in the incidence of RCTs between the CaT group (23.4%) and the control group (37.2%). No significant difference was observed in the size of the RCTs between the two groups (P = 0.422). In the CaT group, 17.4% of patients had complete tears, compared with 26.3% in the control group. There was no significant correlation between the calcification site and RCTs in the CaT group, and only 3.7% of patients suffered calcification and a tear in the exact location of the same tendon (P > 0.05, r = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with shoulder pain without CaT, patients with rotator cuff CaT suffered no increased risk of RCTs on MRI, so CaT and RCTs may have different pathological causes, and there is no significant correlation between the two.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估肩袖钙化性肌腱炎(CaT)在肩袖撕裂(RCTs)中的发生率,并评估 CaT 与 MRI 检查的 RCTs 之间的相关性。

方法

回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月我院收治的 108 例肩袖 CaT 患者的 MRI。对另一组年龄、性别、职业和肩伤侧与第一组相似的 108 例患者进行了回顾性分析。根据肩关节 MRI 评估 RCTs 的发生率及其与 CaT 的相关性。

结果

CaT 组(23.4%)与对照组(37.2%)的 RCTs 发生率存在统计学差异(p<0.05)。两组 RCTs 大小无显著性差异(P=0.422)。在 CaT 组中,17.4%的患者发生完全撕裂,而对照组为 26.3%。CaT 组的钙化部位与 RCTs 之间无显著相关性,只有 3.7%的患者在同一肌腱的相同位置发生钙化和撕裂(P>0.05,r=0.03)。

结论

与无 CaT 的肩部疼痛患者相比,肩袖 CaT 患者的 MRI 检查显示其发生 RCTs 的风险并未增加,因此 CaT 和 RCTs 可能具有不同的病理原因,两者之间无显著相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c7/8826678/fb8e68c555f8/12880_2022_746_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验