• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comments about the appraisal of systematic reviews in restorative dentistry.关于修复牙科系统评价评估的评论。
F1000Res. 2021 Jun 3;10:442. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.53117.3. eCollection 2021.
2
Systematic reviews in restorative dentistry: discussing relevant aspects.修复牙科的系统评价:讨论相关方面。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 May;31(3):222-232. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12463. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
3
Spin and reporting in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry.系统评价和荟萃分析中修复牙科随机临床试验的旋转和报告。
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104282. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104282. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry.口腔医学动物研究系统评价的方法学质量。
Vet J. 2012 May;192(2):140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
6
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量:研究结果的普遍意义。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics.系统综述在牙科学中的应用:现状、流行病学及报告特征。
J Dent. 2019 Mar;82:71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
8
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
9
Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals.评价儿科牙科学杂志中系统评价和荟萃分析方法学质量的批判性评估。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Nov;28(6):548-560. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12414. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
10
Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery.系统评价方法学质量的临床实践指南,涵盖心血管风险评估和非心脏手术管理。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Interactive Teaching in Online and Offline Platforms among Dental Undergraduates.口腔医学本科生在线与线下平台互动式教学的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3170. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063170.

关于修复牙科系统评价评估的评论。

Comments about the appraisal of systematic reviews in restorative dentistry.

机构信息

Division of Restorative Dental Sciences, Clinical Sciences Department, Ajman University, Ajman, P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates.

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Berne, BE, 3010, Switzerland.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2021 Jun 3;10:442. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.53117.3. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.53117.3
PMID:35136572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8792871/
Abstract

Adequate adoption of evidence-based practice is deeply rooted in accessing methodological quality and completeness of systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting. Nonetheless, this assumption might be flawed if the methodological quality assessment has not been properly conducted. Taking the former statement into consideration, this correspondence article encourages the improvement of future tertiary manuscripts, especially in the field of restorative dentistry. Thus, this article addresses an overview of reviews in restorative dentistry as an example of evaluating tertiary evidence for increasing the awareness of reviewers, authors, and readers.

摘要

充分采用基于证据的实践,需要深入了解系统评价和荟萃分析报告的方法学质量和完整性。然而,如果方法学质量评估没有得到妥善处理,这种假设可能存在缺陷。考虑到前一个陈述,本文鼓励未来的三级文献的改进,特别是在修复牙科领域。因此,本文以修复牙科的综述为例,介绍了评估三级证据的概述,以提高审稿人、作者和读者的认识。