CIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Centro de Investigácion de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
J Glob Health. 2022 Feb 5;12:04003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04003. eCollection 2022.
The World Health Organization recommends increased male involvement to improve maternal and newborn health in low- and middle-income countries, but few studies have measured the impact of male-engagement interventions on targeted men. A trial of universal home visits to pregnant women and their spouses in Nigeria improved maternal and child health outcomes. This analysis examines the impact of the visits on male spouses.
In Toro Local Government Area in Bauchi State, Nigeria, we randomly allocated eight wards into four waves, beginning the intervention at one-year intervals. The intervention comprised two-monthly evidence-based home visits to discuss local risk factors for maternal and child health with all pregnant women and their male spouses. Measured secondary outcomes of the intervention in the men included knowledge about danger signs in pregnancy and childbirth, beliefs about heavy work in pregnancy, discussion with their wives about pregnancy and childbirth, knowledge about causes and intentions about management of childhood diarrhoea, and views about childhood immunisation. The analysis compared outcomes between men in visited wards (intervention group) and pre-intervention wards (control group), using a cluster test. Generalised linear mixed modelling accounted for the effect of socio-economic differences on the measured impact.
The analysis included 6931 men in the intervention group and 9434 in the control group. More men in the intervention group knew four or more danger signs in pregnancy (risk difference (RD) = 0.186, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.044 to 0.327), and three danger signs in childbirth (RD = 0.091, 95%CI = 0.013 to 0.170), thought pregnant women should reduce heavy work before the third trimester (RD = 0.088, 95% CI = 0.015 to 0.162), and had discussed pregnancy and childbirth with their spouse (RD = 0.157, 95% CI = 0.026 to 0.288). More knew correct management of childhood diarrhoea with fluids and feeding (RD = 0.300, 95% CI = 0.203 to 0.397) and less would give a child medicine to stop diarrhoea (RD = 0.206, 95% CI = 0.125 to 0.287). Socio-economic differences did not explain the effect of the intervention on any of the outcomes.
Universal home visits improved knowledge of male spouses about maternal and child health, which could contribute to improved maternal and child outcomes.
ISRCTN, ISRCTN82954580. 11 August 2017. Retrospectively registered. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN82954580.
世界卫生组织建议增加男性参与度,以改善中低收入国家的母婴健康,但很少有研究衡量男性参与干预对目标男性的影响。在尼日利亚对孕妇及其配偶进行普遍家访的试验改善了母婴健康结果。本分析研究了家访对男性配偶的影响。
在尼日利亚包奇州 Toro 地方政府区,我们将八个病房随机分为四波,每隔一年开始干预。该干预措施包括对所有孕妇及其男性配偶进行为期两个月的基于证据的家访,讨论母婴健康的当地危险因素。干预措施中男性的衡量次要结果包括对妊娠和分娩危险信号的了解、对妊娠期间繁重工作的信念、与妻子讨论妊娠和分娩、对儿童腹泻原因和处理意图的了解以及对儿童免疫接种的看法。使用集群检验比较接受家访病房(干预组)和干预前病房(对照组)之间男性的结果。广义线性混合模型解释了社会经济差异对测量结果的影响。
分析包括干预组的 6931 名男性和对照组的 9434 名男性。更多的干预组男性知道四个或更多妊娠危险信号(风险差异(RD)=0.186,95%置信区间(CI)=0.044 至 0.327)和三个分娩危险信号(RD=0.091,95%CI=0.013 至 0.170),认为孕妇应在第三个三个月前减少繁重工作(RD=0.088,95%CI=0.015 至 0.162),并与配偶讨论了妊娠和分娩(RD=0.157,95%CI=0.026 至 0.288)。更多人知道正确管理儿童腹泻的液体和喂养(RD=0.300,95%CI=0.203 至 0.397),并且更少的人会给孩子吃药来停止腹泻(RD=0.206,95%CI=0.125 至 0.287)。社会经济差异并不能解释干预对任何结果的影响。
普遍家访提高了男性配偶对母婴健康的认识,这有助于改善母婴健康结果。
ISRCTN,ISRCTN82954580。2017 年 8 月 11 日。回顾性注册。http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN82954580。