• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于 34 至 37 孕周、胎膜早破时间延长且阴道或尿液中检出 B 族链球菌的孕妇,即刻分娩与期待治疗的经济学评价。

Immediate birth for women between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus: an economic evaluation.

机构信息

Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.

Group B Strep Support, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2022 Sep;129(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17119. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17119
PMID:35137528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9543209/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

What are the costs, benefits and harms of immediate birth compared with expectant management in women with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 34 -36  weeks of gestation and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus (GBS)?

DESIGN

Mathematical decision model comprising three independent decision trees.

SETTING

UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective.

POPULATION

Women testing positive for GBS with PPROM at 34 -36  weeks of gestation.

METHODS

The model estimates lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using evidence from randomised trials, UK NHS data sources and further observational studies. Simulated events include neonatal infections, morbidity associated with preterm birth and consequences of caesarean birth. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

QALYs, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

In this population, immediate birth dominates expectant management: it is more effective (average lifetime QALYs, 24.705 versus 24.371) and it is cheaper (average lifetime costs, £14,372 versus £19,311). In one-way sensitivity analysis, results are robust to all but the odds ratio estimating the relative effect on incidence of infections. Threshold analysis shows that the odds of infection only need to be >1.5% with expectant management for the benefit of avoiding infections to outweigh the disadvantages of immediate birth. In PSA, immediate birth is the preferred option in >80% of simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal GBS infections are expensive to treat and may result in substantial adverse health consequences. Therefore, immediate birth, which is associated with a reduced risk of neonatal infection compared with expectant management, is expected to generate better health outcomes and decreased lifetime costs.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

For women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and group B streptococcus in vaginal or urine samples, immediate birth is associated with improved health in their babies and reduced costs, compared with expectant management.

摘要

目的

在妊娠 34-36 周时胎膜早破且阴道或尿液中检出 B 族链球菌(GBS)的孕妇中,与期待管理相比,即刻分娩的成本、获益和危害如何?

设计

包含三个独立决策树的数学决策模型。

设置

英国国民保健制度(NHS)和个人社会服务视角。

人群

妊娠 34-36 周时胎膜早破且 GBS 检测阳性的孕妇。

方法

该模型使用随机试验、英国 NHS 数据来源和进一步的观察性研究中的证据来估计终生成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。模拟事件包括新生儿感染、早产相关发病率和剖宫产的后果。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析(PSA)。

主要结局指标

QALY、成本和增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

在该人群中,即刻分娩优于期待管理:它更有效(平均终生 QALY,24.705 比 24.371),且更便宜(平均终生成本,£14372 比 £19311)。在单向敏感性分析中,结果对除了估计感染发生率的相对效果的比值比之外的所有因素均具有稳健性。阈值分析表明,仅当期待管理下感染的可能性比即时分娩高出 1.5%时,避免感染的益处才会超过即时分娩的不利影响。在 PSA 中,80%以上的模拟结果都倾向于即刻分娩。

结论

新生儿 GBS 感染的治疗费用昂贵,可能导致严重的健康后果。因此,与期待管理相比,与新生儿感染风险降低相关的即刻分娩有望产生更好的健康结果并降低终生成本。

推文摘要

对于有早产胎膜早破和阴道或尿液样本中 B 族链球菌的孕妇,与期待管理相比,即刻分娩可改善婴儿的健康状况并降低成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/6db12a84c905/BJO-129-1779-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/282a45ea0e12/BJO-129-1779-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/7789804cc6a0/BJO-129-1779-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/6db12a84c905/BJO-129-1779-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/282a45ea0e12/BJO-129-1779-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/7789804cc6a0/BJO-129-1779-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9543209/6db12a84c905/BJO-129-1779-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Immediate birth for women between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus: an economic evaluation.对于 34 至 37 孕周、胎膜早破时间延长且阴道或尿液中检出 B 族链球菌的孕妇,即刻分娩与期待治疗的经济学评价。
BJOG. 2022 Sep;129(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17119. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial.计划性早产胎膜早破即刻分娩与延迟分娩的经济学评价:来自 PPROMT 随机对照试验的结果。
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):623-630. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14302. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial).孕34至37周胎膜早破孕妇引产与期待治疗的比较(PPROMEXIL试验)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 6;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-11.
4
Using vaginal Group B Streptococcus colonisation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes to guide the decision for immediate delivery: a secondary analysis of the PPROMEXIL trials.利用胎膜早破早产女性的阴道B族链球菌定植情况指导立即分娩决策:PPROMEXIL试验的二次分析
BJOG. 2014 Sep;121(10):1263-72; discussion 1273. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12889. Epub 2014 May 27.
5
The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease.早发型新生儿B族链球菌病的预防
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30818-5.
6
Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.足月前胎膜早破期待治疗与即刻分娩的随机对照试验(PPROMT 试验)
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):444-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00724-2. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).孕28 - 32周胎膜早破时计划性早期分娩与期待治疗的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验(MICADO研究)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
8
Amnioinfusion in preterm premature rupture of membranes (AMIPROM): a randomised controlled trial of amnioinfusion versus expectant management in very early preterm premature rupture of membranes--a pilot study.羊膜腔灌注在早产胎膜早破中的应用(AMIPROM):极早早产胎膜早破中羊膜腔灌注与期待治疗的随机对照试验——一项初步研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(21):1-135. doi: 10.3310/hta18210.
9
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.对于妊娠37周前胎膜早破的孕妇,计划早产与期待治疗对改善妊娠结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub3.
10
Expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes at 34 weeks: a cost effectiveness analysis.期待治疗 34 周时的早产胎膜早破:成本效益分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9136-9144. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2017874. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Methods and Practice for Integrating Maternal, Fetal, and Child Health Outcomes, and Family Spillover Effects into Cost-Utility Analyses.系统评价将母婴、胎儿和儿童健康结局以及家庭溢出效应纳入成本效用分析的方法和实践。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Aug;42(8):843-863. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01397-5. Epub 2024 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of strategies preventing late-onset infection in preterm infants.预防早产儿晚发性感染策略的成本效益。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 May;105(5):452-457. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317640. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
Care of Women Presenting with Suspected Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes from 24 Weeks of Gestation: Green-top Guideline No. 73.妊娠24周起疑似早产胎膜早破孕妇的护理:第73号绿帽指南
BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):e152-e166. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15803. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90 days, 2014-15: a prospective surveillance study.
2014-15 年英国和爱尔兰 90 天以下婴儿 B 群链球菌病:一项前瞻性监测研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;19(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30555-3. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of maternal immunisation against group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease: A modelling study.针对 B 型链球菌(GBS)疾病的母体免疫接种的成本效益分析:建模研究。
Vaccine. 2018 Nov 12;36(46):7033-7042. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.058. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
5
Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术对母婴及后续妊娠的长期风险和获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23;15(1):e1002494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.对于妊娠37周前胎膜早破的孕妇,计划早产与期待治疗以改善妊娠结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub4.
7
An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial.计划性早产胎膜早破即刻分娩与延迟分娩的经济学评价:来自 PPROMT 随机对照试验的结果。
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):623-630. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14302. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery.对有晚期早产风险的女性使用产前倍他米松。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 7;374(14):1311-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516783. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.足月前胎膜早破期待治疗与即刻分娩的随机对照试验(PPROMT 试验)
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):444-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00724-2. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
10
Common patterns of morbidity and multi-morbidity and their impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey.发病率和多重发病率的常见模式及其对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项全国性调查的证据
Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):909-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0820-7. Epub 2014 Oct 26.