• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial).孕34至37周胎膜早破孕妇引产与期待治疗的比较(PPROMEXIL试验)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 6;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-11.
2
Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (PPROMEXIL trial).比较 34-37 周胎膜早破孕妇行引产与期待治疗的经济学分析(PPROMEXIL 试验)。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12329. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
3
An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial.计划性早产胎膜早破即刻分娩与延迟分娩的经济学评价:来自 PPROMT 随机对照试验的结果。
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):623-630. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14302. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
4
Child outcomes after induction of labour or expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation: study protocol of the PPROMEXIL Follow-up trial. A long-term follow-up study of the randomised controlled trials PPROMEXIL and PPROMEXIL-2.在妊娠 34 至 37 周胎膜早破孕妇中,引产与期待治疗对母婴结局的影响:PPROMEXIL 随访试验研究方案。PPROMEXIL 和 PPROMEXIL-2 两项随机对照试验的长期随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):e046046. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046046.
5
Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.足月前胎膜早破期待治疗与即刻分娩的随机对照试验(PPROMT 试验)
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):444-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00724-2. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).孕28 - 32周胎膜早破时计划性早期分娩与期待治疗的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验(MICADO研究)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis during the second and third trimester to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and morbidity.孕中期和孕晚期进行抗生素预防以降低不良妊娠结局和发病率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD002250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002250.pub2.
8
Maternal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation.24 孕周前胎膜早破孕妇的围产期发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):558.e1-558.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.036. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
Childhood outcomes after induction of labor or expectant management for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a 10-year follow-up of the PPROMEXIL trials.胎膜早破引产或期待治疗后的儿童结局:PPROMEXIL试验的10年随访
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):588.e1-588.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
10
Protocol for the immediate delivery versus expectant care of women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT) Trial [ISRCTN44485060].足月前胎膜早破(PPROMT)妇女立即分娩与期待治疗的试验方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN44485060]
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Mar 23;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectant versus immediate delivery in women with PPROM between 34 and 35 weeks: A Retrospective cohort.孕34至35周胎膜早破孕妇期待治疗与即刻分娩的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jul 30;9(7):3225-3229. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_146_20. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.系统评价分娩诱导的临床指征。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228196. eCollection 2020.
3
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.对于妊娠37周前胎膜早破的孕妇,计划早产与期待治疗以改善妊娠结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub4.
4
A new anti-microbial combination prolongs the latency period, reduces acute histologic chorioamnionitis as well as funisitis, and improves neonatal outcomes in preterm PROM.一种新的抗菌组合可延长潜伏期,减少急性组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎以及脐带炎,并改善早产胎膜早破的新生儿结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(5):707-20. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1020293. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks: a randomized controlled trial.在 34 至 37 周之间胎膜早破的孕妇中进行引产与期待治疗的随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
6
Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis.临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的诊断与处理。
Clin Perinatol. 2010 Jun;37(2):339-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.02.003.
7
Accounting for multiple births in neonatal and perinatal trials: systematic review and case study.在新生儿和围产儿试验中考虑多胎妊娠:系统评价和案例研究。
J Pediatr. 2010 Feb;156(2):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.08.049. Epub 2009 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of intentional delivery in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Mar;19(3):177-87. doi: 10.1080/14767050500451470.
2
Protocol for the immediate delivery versus expectant care of women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT) Trial [ISRCTN44485060].足月前胎膜早破(PPROMT)妇女立即分娩与期待治疗的试验方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN44485060]
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Mar 23;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-9.
3
International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics.国际儿童脓毒症共识会议:儿童脓毒症及器官功能障碍的定义
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6.
4
Preterm premature rupture of membranes: is there an optimal gestational age for delivery?胎膜早破:是否存在最佳分娩孕周?
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;105(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000147841.79428.4b.
5
Management of premature rupture of membranes.胎膜早破的处理
Clin Perinatol. 2001 Dec;28(4):837-47. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00081-2.
6
Timing of labor induction after premature rupture of membranes between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation.孕32至36周胎膜早破后引产的时机
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 1):349-52. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70212-7.
7
Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks' gestation: aggressive versus conservative management.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jan;178(1 Pt 1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70638-6.
8
Preterm delivery from 34 to 37 weeks of gestation: is respiratory distress syndrome a problem?妊娠34至37周的早产:呼吸窘迫综合征是个问题吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):525-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70421-0.
9
Necrotizing enterocolitis: the search for a unifying pathogenic theory leading to prevention.坏死性小肠结肠炎:探寻导致预防的统一致病理论。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1996 Apr;43(2):409-32. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70413-2.
10
Induction versus expectant management in premature rupture of the membranes with mature amniotic fluid at 32 to 36 weeks: a randomized trial.32至36周胎膜早破且羊水成熟时引产与期待治疗的随机试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):775-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90004-3.

孕34至37周胎膜早破孕妇引产与期待治疗的比较(PPROMEXIL试验)

Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial).

作者信息

van der Ham David P, Nijhuis Jan G, Mol Ben Willem J, van Beek Johannes J, Opmeer Brent C, Bijlenga Denise, Groenewout Mariette, Arabin Birgit, Bloemenkamp Kitty W M, van Wijngaarden Wim J, Wouters Maurice G A J, Pernet Paula J M, Porath Martina M, Molkenboer Jan F M, Derks Jan B, Kars Michael M, Scheepers Hubertina C J, Weinans Martin J N, Woiski Mallory D, Wildschut Hajo I J, Willekes Christine

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VieCuri Medical Centre Venlo, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 6;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-11.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-7-11
PMID:17617892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1934382/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes (PPROM) is an important clinical problem and a dilemma for the gynaecologist. On the one hand, awaiting spontaneous labour increases the probability of infectious disease for both mother and child, whereas on the other hand induction of labour leads to preterm birth with an increase in neonatal morbidity (e.g., respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)) and a possible rise in the number of instrumental deliveries.

METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of immediate delivery after PPROM in near term gestation compared to expectant management. Pregnant women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes at a gestational age from 34+0 weeks until 37+0 weeks will be included in a multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. We will compare early delivery with expectant monitoring. The primary outcome of this study is neonatal sepsis. Secondary outcome measures are maternal morbidity (chorioamnionitis, puerperal sepsis) and neonatal disease, instrumental delivery rate, maternal quality of life, maternal preferences and costs. We anticipate that a reduction of neonatal infection from 7.5% to 2.5% after induction will outweigh an increase in RDS and additional costs due to admission of the child due to prematurity. Under these assumptions, we aim to randomly allocate 520 women to two groups of 260 women each. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Additionally a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate if the cost related to early delivery will outweigh those of expectant management. Long term outcomes will be evaluated using modelling.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide evidence as to whether induction of labour after preterm prelabour rupture of membranes is an effective and cost-effective strategy to reduce the risk of neonatal sepsis. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER: ISRCTN29313500.

摘要

背景

胎膜早破(PPROM)是一个重要的临床问题,也是妇科医生面临的两难困境。一方面,等待自然分娩会增加母婴感染疾病的概率;另一方面,引产会导致早产,增加新生儿发病率(如呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)),并可能增加器械助产的数量。

方法/设计:我们旨在确定与期待治疗相比,近足月妊娠胎膜早破后立即分娩的有效性和成本效益。孕周从34+0周直到37+0周的胎膜早破孕妇将被纳入一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验。我们将早期分娩与期待监测进行比较。本研究的主要结局是新生儿败血症。次要结局指标包括孕产妇发病率(绒毛膜羊膜炎、产褥期败血症)和新生儿疾病、器械助产率、孕产妇生活质量、孕产妇偏好和成本。我们预计引产术后新生儿感染率从7.5%降至2.5%的益处将超过因早产导致新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征增加以及因新生儿入院带来的额外成本。在这些假设下,我们旨在将520名女性随机分配到两组,每组260名女性。分析将按照意向性分析进行。此外,将进行成本效益分析,以评估早期分娩的相关成本是否超过期待治疗的成本。长期结局将通过建模进行评估。

讨论

本试验将提供证据,证明胎膜早破后引产是否是降低新生儿败血症风险的有效且具有成本效益的策略。

对照临床试验注册

ISRCTN29313500。