Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Jul;219(1):86-96. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27186. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
LI-RADS has been investigated primarily in terms of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with less attention given to its performance, particularly on CT, in determining eligibility for liver transplant (LT). The purpose of our study was to assess the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018) on CT for the diagnosis of HCC and determination of LT eligibility according to the Milan criteria (MC). This retrospective study included 136 patients (110 men, 26 women; mean age, 53.9 ± 8.1 [SD] years) at high-risk for HCC who underwent liver protocol CT within 3 months before LT between January 2010 and December 2018. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT examinations using LI-RADS v2018; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) classes were constructed from the LI-RADS interpretations. Histopathologic analysis of liver explants served as the reference standard for determining the presence of HCC and LT eligibility based on MC. Diagnostic performance was evaluated. Overall survival (OS) was assessed based on medical record review. Based on histopathologic evaluation of liver explants in the 136 patients, 27 patients had no malignancy, 77 were eligible for LT due to HCC within MC, and 32 were unsuitable for LT (i.e., HCC beyond MC in 16 patients, HCC with macrovascular invasion in 12, non-HCC malignancy in four). LR-5 exhibited per-lesion sensitivity and PPV for HCC of 55.9% and 92.8%, respectively, for reader 1 and 39.8% and 86.5% for reader 2. When considering LR-5 observations to represent HCC in assessing MC, LI-RADS had accuracy for determining LT eligibility of 92.7% for reader 1 and 85.3% for reader 2; OPTN criteria had accuracy for determining LT eligibility of 89.0% for reader 1 and 84.4% for reader 2. Five-year OS for patients within MC versus 5-year OS for patients unsuitable for LT was 92.2 months versus 56.0 months for LI-RADS, 92.6 months versus 47.6 months for OPTN criteria, and 93.3 months versus 55.1 months for histopathologic assessment of liver explants. LI-RADS v2018, as evaluated on CT in high-risk patients, shows high PPV for HCC detection and high accuracy for determining LT eligibility based on MC. LT eligibility based on preoperative LI-RADS evaluation is associated with post-LT survival. These findings support the use of LI-RADS on CT in assessing eligibility in patients who are candidates for LT.
LI-RADS 主要针对肝细胞癌(HCC)的检测进行了研究,而对其在确定是否符合米兰标准(MC)以进行肝移植(LT)方面的表现关注较少。本研究的目的是评估 LI-RADS 2018 版(v2018)在 CT 上对 HCC 的诊断和根据 MC 确定 LT 资格的性能。这项回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间因 HCC 风险较高而在 LT 前 3 个月内接受肝脏协议 CT 检查的 136 例患者(110 例男性,26 例女性;平均年龄 53.9±8.1[SD]岁)。两名放射科医生独立使用 LI-RADS v2018 对 CT 检查进行了评估;根据 LI-RADS 解读构建了器官获取和移植网络(OPTN)分类。对肝脏标本的组织病理学分析作为确定 HCC 存在和根据 MC 确定 LT 资格的参考标准。评估了诊断性能。根据病历评估了 136 例患者的总生存率(OS)。基于对 136 例患者肝脏标本的组织病理学评估,27 例患者无恶性肿瘤,77 例患者符合 MC 范围内的 LT 标准,32 例患者不符合 LT 标准(即 16 例患者的 HCC 超出 MC,12 例患者的 HCC 伴大血管侵犯,4 例患者的非 HCC 恶性肿瘤)。读者 1 和读者 2 的 LR-5 对 HCC 的病变内敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为 55.9%和 92.8%,读者 2 的 LR-5 为 39.8%和 86.5%。当考虑将 LR-5 观察结果视为 MC 中 HCC 的代表时,LI-RADS 确定 LT 资格的准确性为读者 1 的 92.7%,读者 2 的 85.3%;读者 1 的 OPTN 标准确定 LT 资格的准确性为 89.0%,读者 2 的准确性为 84.4%。MC 范围内的患者与不适合 LT 的患者的 5 年 OS 分别为 LI-RADS 的 92.2 个月与 56.0 个月,OPTN 标准的 92.6 个月与 47.6 个月,肝脏标本组织病理学评估的 93.3 个月与 55.1 个月。在高危患者的 CT 上评估的 LI-RADS v2018 版显示 HCC 检测的高 PPV 和基于 MC 确定 LT 资格的高准确性。基于术前 LI-RADS 评估的 LT 资格与 LT 后的生存相关。这些发现支持在评估 LT 候选患者的资格时在 CT 上使用 LI-RADS。