• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝细胞癌(HCC)与非 HCC:肝脏影像报告和数据系统 v2018 的准确性和可靠性。

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.

机构信息

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, Saint Louis, MO, 63104, USA.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jun;44(6):2116-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01948-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-019-01948-x
PMID:30798397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6538452/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was created to standardize the diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has undergone multiple revisions including a recent update in 2018 (v2018). The primary aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance and interrater reliability (IRR) of LI-RADS v2018 for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary hepatic malignancy in patients 'at-risk' for HCC. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of changes introduced in the v2018 diagnostic algorithm.

METHODS

This retrospective study combined a 10-year experience of pathologically proven primary liver malignancies from two large liver transplant centers. Two blinded readers independently evaluated each lesion and assigned a LI-RADS diagnostic category, additionally scoring all relevant imaging features. Changes in category based on the reader-provided features and the new v2018 criteria were assessed by a study coordinator.

RESULTS

The final study cohort comprised 105 HCCs and 73 non-HCC primarily liver malignancies. LI-RADS had a high specificity for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC (89% and 90% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively), and IRR was moderate to substantial for final LI-RADS category and most features. Revision of the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm resulted in very few changes [5 (2.8%) and 3 (1.7%) for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively] in overall lesion classification.

CONCLUSION

LI-RADS diagnostic categories and features had moderate to substantial IRR and high specificity for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy. Revision of LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm resulted in reclassification of very few lesions.

摘要

目的

肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)旨在规范肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断标准,并经历了多次修订,包括最近在 2018 年的更新(v2018)。本研究的主要目的是确定 LI-RADS v2018 用于区分 HCC 和非 HCC 原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤在 HCC 高危患者中的诊断性能和组内一致性(IRR)。次要目的是评估 v2018 诊断算法中引入的变化的影响。

方法

这项回顾性研究结合了来自两个大型肝移植中心的 10 年经病理证实的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤经验。两名盲法读者独立评估每个病变并分配 LI-RADS 诊断类别,另外还对所有相关的影像学特征进行评分。根据读者提供的特征和新的 v2018 标准,由研究协调员评估类别变化。

结果

最终的研究队列包括 105 例 HCC 和 73 例非 HCC 原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤。LI-RADS 对区分 HCC 和非 HCC 具有很高的特异性(读者 1 和读者 2 的特异性分别为 89%和 90%),并且对最终的 LI-RADS 类别和大多数特征的 IRR 为中度至高度。LI-RADS v2018 诊断算法的修订导致整体病变分类的变化很少[读者 1 和读者 2 分别为 5(2.8%)和 3(1.7%)]。

结论

LI-RADS 诊断类别和特征对区分 HCC 和非 HCC 原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤具有中度至高度的 IRR 和高度特异性。LI-RADS v2018 诊断算法的修订导致很少有病变被重新分类。

相似文献

1
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.肝细胞癌(HCC)与非 HCC:肝脏影像报告和数据系统 v2018 的准确性和可靠性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jun;44(6):2116-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01948-x.
2
Expanding the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 diagnostic population: performance and reliability of LI-RADS for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver carcinoma in patients who do not meet strict LI-RADS high-risk criteria.扩大肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS) v2018 诊断人群:不符合严格 LI-RADS 高危标准的患者中,LI-RADS 对区分肝细胞癌(HCC)与非 HCC 原发性肝癌的性能和可靠性。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Dec;21(12):1697-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk patients matched to MR field strength: diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018.在与磁共振场强匹配的高危患者中,鉴别肝细胞癌、肝内胆管细胞癌和肝细胞-胆管细胞癌:LI-RADS 版本 2018 的诊断性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jul;46(7):3168-3178. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-02996-y. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.LI-RADS M (LR-M) 标准和 v2018 版报告算法:钆塞酸增强 MRI 评估原发性肝癌的诊断价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Aug;45(8):2440-2448. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02545-z.
5
Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝细胞癌的 MRI 诊断性能,与 v2017 相比。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;50(3):746-755. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26640. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
6
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane With Modified Criteria Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 for Diagnosing HCC in High-Risk Patients.应用改良标准对比增强超声造影与 CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 对高危人群 HCC 进行诊断的个体内比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 May;220(5):682-691. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28420. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
7
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018、LI-RADS 版本 2017 和 OPTN 标准用于诊断肝细胞癌的性能比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov;215(5):1085-1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22772. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancies in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.LI-RADS 版本 2018 诊断性能在乙型肝炎病毒感染患者中区分肝细胞癌与其他肝脏恶性肿瘤。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2020 Aug 3;20(3):401-410. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4576.
9
Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.提高 LI-RADS v2018 对细胞外对比增强 MRI 中小肝癌(10-19mm)诊断的灵敏度。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Apr;46(4):1530-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02790-2. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
10
Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors.LI-RADS v2018 对除肝细胞癌(HCC)以外的原发性肝癌的评估:LI-RADS 目标人群与无 LI-RADS 定义的 HCC 风险因素患者的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):996-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06448-6. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiphase Computed Tomography Scan Findings for Artificial Intelligence Training in the Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Interobserver Agreement of Expert Abdominal Radiologists.基于腹部放射学专家观察者间一致性的多期计算机断层扫描结果用于肝细胞癌和肝内胆管癌鉴别诊断的人工智能训练
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 24;15(7):821. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070821.
2
Current State of Evidence for Use of MRI in LI-RADS.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)中使用MRI的证据现状
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Sep;62(3):640-653. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29748. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Benign and malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement on CT and MRI.在CT和MRI上表现为边缘动脉期强化的肝脏局灶性良恶性病变。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jul 18;15(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01756-y.
4
Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis.LI-RADS 类别 5 与类别 4 和 5 联合的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov;34(11):7025-7040. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10813-5. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CT/MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)M类成像特征的阅片者间一致性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Liver Cancer. 2024 Sep;24(2):192-205. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2024.04.05. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
6
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Optimal Radiological Evaluation before Liver Transplantation.肝细胞癌:肝移植前的最佳影像学评估
Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;13(12):2267. doi: 10.3390/life13122267.
7
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: differential diagnostic value of ADC values for benign and malignant nodules with moderate probability (LR-3).肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)v2018:表观扩散系数(ADC)值对中度可能性(LR-3)的良性和恶性结节的鉴别诊断价值
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 22;13:1186290. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1186290. eCollection 2023.
8
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.肝脏影像报告和数据系统 2018 版第 5 类诊断肝细胞癌:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Mar;34(3):1502-1514. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10134-z. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
9
Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates.LI-RADS v2018 对钆塞酸增强 MRI 检测肝移植候选者肝细胞癌的性能不佳。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10014-6. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
10
Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancer Based on LI-RADS Classification with Extracellular Agent-Enhanced MRI.基于LI-RADS分类及细胞外对比剂增强MRI的原发性肝癌预后分析
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023 Mar 9;10:399-411. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S394840. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.肝细胞癌-胆管细胞癌混合型:钆塞酸增强磁共振成像的 LI-RADS v2017 分类用于鉴别诊断和预后评估。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):373-382. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5605-x. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
A radiogenomic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma: association between fractional allelic imbalance rate index and the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) categories and features.肝细胞癌的放射基因组学分析:等位基因不平衡率指数与肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)类别及特征之间的关联
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jun;91(1086):20170962. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170962. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
3
cHCC-CCA: Consensus terminology for primary liver carcinomas with both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentation.cHCC-CCA:具有肝细胞和胆管细胞分化的原发性肝癌的共识术语。
Hepatology. 2018 Jul;68(1):113-126. doi: 10.1002/hep.29789. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update.2017 版 CT 和 MR 成像肝脏影像学报告和数据系统:更新。
Radiographics. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(7):1994-2017. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017170098.
5
Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2014 Algorithm and Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large International Multireader Study.LI-RADS 版本 2014 算法和影像学特征在诊断肝细胞癌中的读者间可靠性:一项大型国际多读者研究。
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):173-185. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170376. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
Imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肝癌的影像学诊断:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):401-421. doi: 10.1002/hep.29487. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Hepatic Malignancies in Patients at Risk: Diagnostic Performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2014.在高危患者中鉴别肝细胞癌与其他肝脏恶性肿瘤:肝脏影像报告和数据系统 2014 版的诊断性能。
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):158-172. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170114. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
8
Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: a review from the society of abdominal radiology disease focus panel.肝纤维化评估:来自腹部放射学会疾病聚焦小组的综述
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Aug;42(8):2037-2053. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1211-7.
9
LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma.LI-RADS M(LR-M):明确或可能为恶性肿瘤,不能特异诊断为肝细胞癌。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jan;43(1):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1196-2.
10
Liver transplantation and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: Feasibility and outcomes.肝移植与肝细胞胆管癌合并症:可行性与结果
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 May;49(5):467-470. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.166. Epub 2017 Feb 6.