• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

易怒情绪能否预测临床焦虑青少年对威胁的注意偏向?

Does irritability predict attention biases toward threat among clinically anxious youth?

作者信息

Elvin Olivia M, Waters Allison M, Modecki Kathryn L

机构信息

School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Southport, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;32(8):1435-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-01954-3. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00787-022-01954-3
PMID:35138476
Abstract

Aberrant threat processing is a known cognitive characteristic of anxiety disorders and irritability. Youth with more severe symptomatology show greater allocation of attention towards threat relative to neutral stimuli. Although irritability contributes to poorer outcomes among anxious youths, irritability has not been considered as a contributing factor to threat processing in anxiety disorders. Thus, the current study examined the role of irritability in predicting attention biases for threat among clinically anxious youth. Our study included 84 clinically anxious youth (M = 9.31 years old, SD = 2.44) who completed a dot-probe task to determine attention biases. Anxiety disorders were assessed using semi-structured diagnostic interviews. Well validated measures were used to assess the severity of anxiety and irritability symptoms via child- and parent-report, respectively. Findings indicated that more severe irritability predicted greater attention biases toward threat among clinically anxious youth, covarying for age, anxiety severity, and the number of comorbid diagnoses. At a trend-level, anxiety severity also predicted attention bias for threat. Among clinically anxious youth, irritability severity was the strongest predictor of attention bias toward threat. Findings point to the salience of irritability, and to some extent anxiety severity, in relation to threat processing among youth with clinical anxiety disorders.

摘要

异常的威胁处理是焦虑症和易怒的一种已知认知特征。症状更严重的青少年相对于中性刺激,会将更多注意力分配到威胁上。尽管易怒会导致焦虑青少年的预后更差,但易怒尚未被视为焦虑症中威胁处理的一个促成因素。因此,本研究考察了易怒在预测临床焦虑青少年对威胁的注意偏向中的作用。我们的研究纳入了84名临床焦虑青少年(M = 9.31岁,SD = 2.44),他们完成了一项点探测任务以确定注意偏向。使用半结构化诊断访谈评估焦虑症。分别通过儿童报告和家长报告,采用经过充分验证的量表来评估焦虑和易怒症状的严重程度。研究结果表明,在考虑年龄、焦虑严重程度和共病诊断数量的情况下,更严重的易怒预示着临床焦虑青少年对威胁有更大的注意偏向。在趋势水平上,焦虑严重程度也预示着对威胁的注意偏向。在临床焦虑青少年中,易怒严重程度是对威胁的注意偏向的最强预测因素。研究结果表明,在患有临床焦虑症的青少年中,易怒以及在一定程度上焦虑严重程度在威胁处理方面具有显著意义。

相似文献

1
Does irritability predict attention biases toward threat among clinically anxious youth?易怒情绪能否预测临床焦虑青少年对威胁的注意偏向?
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;32(8):1435-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-01954-3. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
Attention bias to threat faces in severe mood dysregulation.严重情绪失调中对威胁面孔的注意偏向。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Jul;31(7):559-65. doi: 10.1002/da.22145. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
3
Association of Irritability and Anxiety With the Neural Mechanisms of Implicit Face Emotion Processing in Youths With Psychopathology.易怒和焦虑与有精神病理学问题的青少年内隐面部情绪加工神经机制的关联
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):95-103. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3282.
4
Family Accommodation in Anxious Irritable and Anxious Nonirritable Youth.焦虑烦躁和不烦躁青少年中的家庭适应。
Behav Ther. 2024 Sep;55(5):913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
A cross-sectional analysis of the relationships between anxiety sensitivity and youth irritability: the mediated roles of insomnia and selective attention for threat.焦虑敏感与青少年易怒的横断面分析:失眠和对威胁的选择性注意的中介作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05280-z.
6
Anxious-Irritable Children: A Distinct Subtype of Childhood Anxiety?焦虑-烦躁儿童:儿童焦虑的一个独特亚型?
Behav Ther. 2020 Mar;51(2):211-222. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Eye-Tracking of Attention to Threat in Child and Adolescent Anxiety.系统评价和荟萃分析:儿童和青少年焦虑中对威胁的眼动追踪。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):88-99.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
8
The Link Between Anxiety Severity and Irritability Among Anxious Youth: Evaluating the Mediating Role of Sleep Problems.焦虑青少年的焦虑严重程度与易怒之间的联系:评估睡眠问题的中介作用。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Jun;49(3):352-359. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0769-1.
9
A Latent Variable Approach to Differentiating Neural Mechanisms of Irritability and Anxiety in Youth.一种潜在变量方法,用于区分青少年烦躁和焦虑的神经机制。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0468.
10
Attentional Bias in Youth With Clinical Anxiety: The Moderating Effect of Age.患有临床焦虑症的青少年的注意偏向:年龄的调节作用。
J Cogn Psychother. 2015;29(3):185-196. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.29.3.185. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Joining the pieces in childhood irritability: Distinct typologies predict conduct, depressive, and anxiety symptoms.将童年期烦躁的各个方面联系起来:不同的类型学可以预测行为、抑郁和焦虑症状。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Jan;136:103779. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103779. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Anxious-Irritable Children: A Distinct Subtype of Childhood Anxiety?焦虑-烦躁儿童:儿童焦虑的一个独特亚型?
Behav Ther. 2020 Mar;51(2):211-222. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety and attentional control.
焦虑与注意力控制关系的元分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;72:101754. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101754. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Assessing the Irritable and Defiant Dimensions of Youth Oppositional Behavior Using CBCL and YSR Items.使用 CBCL 和 YSR 项目评估青少年对立行为的易激惹和反抗维度。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;49(6):804-819. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2019.1622119. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Eye-Tracking of Attention to Threat in Child and Adolescent Anxiety.系统评价和荟萃分析:儿童和青少年焦虑中对威胁的眼动追踪。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):88-99.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
6
An integrative review of the vigilance-avoidance model in pediatric anxiety disorders: Are we looking in the wrong place?儿童焦虑障碍警觉回避模型的综合述评:我们是否找错了地方?
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 May;64:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Attention Bias Modification Treatment in Youth With Treatment-Resistant Anxiety Disorders.一项针对治疗抵抗性焦虑障碍青少年的注意偏向修正治疗的随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
Results from the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Longitudinal Study (CAMELS): Functional outcomes.儿童/青少年焦虑多模态纵向研究(CAMELS)结果:功能结局。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Sep;86(9):738-750. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000334.
9
Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents.注意偏向威胁与儿童和青少年焦虑症状的关系。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Mar;35(3):229-238. doi: 10.1002/da.22706. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Pediatric Irritability: A Systems Neuroscience Approach.小儿易怒:一种系统神经科学方法
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;21(4):277-289. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 6.